Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: No, not THAT world, Pat. posted by carcass93 on July 25, 2010 at 08:15:30:
It's also nice to be able to recognize them.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - a tale of bias. The irony of the common held beliefs of many objectivists - Analog Scott 13:30:55 07/19/10 (133)
- Objectivism isn't worthy of serious attention - Jay Buridan 09:00:26 07/29/10 (5)
- Thank you - Don Till 16:10:29 08/05/10 (0)
- RE: Objectivism isn't worthy of serious attention - Pat D 19:17:51 08/01/10 (0)
- RE: Objectivism isn't worthy of serious attention - Tony Lauck 13:59:13 07/29/10 (0)
- RE: Objectivism isn't worthy of serious attention - rick_m 13:15:29 07/29/10 (0)
- RE: Objectivism isn't worthy of serious attention - Tony Lauck 09:50:51 07/29/10 (0)
- Ever hear of the argumentem ad hominem fallacy? - Pat D 14:59:47 07/21/10 (18)
- Funny that I predicted you would jump in and try to take this on some bizarre tangent. - Analog Scott 02:29:44 07/22/10 (14)
- You're predictable: never deal with arguments. - Pat D 05:11:28 07/22/10 (13)
- "What points are you *trying* to make?" - Analog Scott 12:49:19 07/22/10 (0)
- RE: You're predictable: never deal with arguments. - kerr 06:43:21 07/22/10 (11)
- actually there is a lot to be learned from 'each side." - Analog Scott 10:38:09 07/22/10 (1)
- Nice post - thanks. Well said (nt) - kerr 04:40:25 07/23/10 (0)
- RE: You're predictable: never deal with arguments. - Pat D 08:43:20 07/22/10 (7)
- RE: You're predictable: never deal with arguments. - Analog Scott 12:55:51 07/22/10 (6)
- RE: You're predictable: never deal with arguments. - Pat D 16:37:42 07/22/10 (5)
- *spits out a fine cup of coffee* - robert young 08:00:40 07/24/10 (4)
- That's priceless - E-Stat 08:07:58 07/24/10 (3)
- I keep wondering how many times I have to link this . . . - Pat D 11:40:24 07/24/10 (2)
- You have no idea why I'm laughing at you, do you? - robert young 13:05:32 07/24/10 (1)
- He doesn't get it, does he? -nt - E-Stat 16:10:08 07/24/10 (0)
- This is one of those cases when the process itself IS the goal - and... - carcass93 08:31:19 07/22/10 (0)
- Where's your meta-analysis? Better than that here is the meta-analyst - Don Till 20:37:05 07/21/10 (2)
- Is that a picture of Analog Scott? (nt) - Pat D 05:43:49 07/22/10 (1)
- Is your question what passes as humor? - carcass93 11:18:14 07/22/10 (0)
- And your position is what? - Don Till 12:54:09 07/21/10 (3)
- the one you quoted - Analog Scott 13:45:35 07/21/10 (2)
- RE: the one you quoted - Don Till 16:03:10 07/21/10 (1)
- "All I can say is this is just the typical vomit posing as critical thinking on an audio website." - Analog Scott 02:39:35 07/22/10 (0)
- Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Enophile 14:24:23 07/20/10 (91)
- What "good", together with "bad", objectivists fail to understand,... - carcass93 14:28:54 07/21/10 (0)
- I guess you didn't follow the links to the two threads I cited - Analog Scott 01:25:39 07/21/10 (74)
- Don't you believe in replication? - Pat D 05:43:59 07/21/10 (73)
- I don't believe in cherry picking - Analog Scott 10:02:59 07/21/10 (7)
- RE: I don't believe in cherry picking - Pat D 15:13:20 07/21/10 (5)
- try to stay on topic Pat - Analog Scott 12:47:59 07/22/10 (4)
- You OP was confused and offered no supporting evidence. - Pat D 19:05:46 07/22/10 (3)
- No really, try to stay on topic - Analog Scott 03:05:51 07/23/10 (2)
- You don't even seem to know what your original post was about! - Pat D 06:46:38 07/23/10 (1)
- yeah right Pat. Even as pure obfusecation that is pretty weak. - Analog Scott 09:03:24 07/23/10 (0)
- RE: I don't believe in cherry picking - Tony Lauck 12:35:12 07/21/10 (0)
- Zactly. - Enophile 08:16:58 07/21/10 (5)
- RE: Zactly. - josh358 18:55:35 07/22/10 (0)
- And that has what to do with anything I have said? - Analog Scott 10:05:52 07/21/10 (2)
- "And that has what to do with anything I have said?" Yup, just chatting about the dichotomy. - Enophile 10:54:08 07/21/10 (1)
- RE: "And that has what to do with anything I have said?" Yup, just chatting about the dichotomy. - Analog Scott 11:23:50 07/21/10 (0)
- RE: Zactly. - kerr 09:04:18 07/21/10 (0)
- RE: Why should anyone accept some anomalous result without replication? - rick_m 07:17:26 07/21/10 (58)
- Do people try their hardest to get the righmost post under "classic view"? - kurt s 07:12:31 08/12/10 (1)
- RE: Do people try their hardest to get the righmost post under "classic view"? - rick_m 08:22:02 08/12/10 (0)
- RE: Why should anyone accept some anomalous result without replication? - Pat D 08:17:33 07/21/10 (55)
- So Pat, why haven't you brought up this point with the other example i cited? - Analog Scott 11:02:32 07/22/10 (54)
- Have I cited that article? - Pat D 16:15:05 07/22/10 (53)
- No, I cited it. You chose to ignore it. More cherry picking - Analog Scott 03:07:48 07/23/10 (52)
- How could you cite it since you don't even seem to know what it was? - Pat D 06:18:51 07/23/10 (51)
- You never have been one to let the facts get in the way of your beliefs. two simple facts - Analog Scott 09:12:53 07/23/10 (50)
- LOL! Prove the 1985 article exists! (nt) - Pat D 11:14:27 07/23/10 (49)
- Seriously? do you want me to prove Russia exists too since you haven't seen it in person? - Analog Scott 11:25:04 07/23/10 (48)
- Who wrote the alleged 1985 article? What is its title? - Pat D 19:12:49 07/23/10 (47)
- actually I misremembered. it was a 1987 article - Analog Scott 16:58:45 07/24/10 (1)
- RE: actually I misremembered. it was a 1987 article - Pat D 19:52:59 07/24/10 (0)
- Its great fun to stay away from this sandbox for a while... - robert young 07:55:34 07/24/10 (44)
- AS wants to argue about an article he doesnt have. - Pat D 10:38:22 07/24/10 (43)
- You are wasting your debating skills... - robert young 11:18:47 07/24/10 (42)
- RE: You are wasting your debating skills... - Pat D 16:09:26 07/24/10 (41)
- I predicted 20 posts of pure obfuscation from you on this thread - Analog Scott 17:03:52 07/24/10 (30)
- Have you found those FR differences you mentioned that exceed known audible thresholds yet? - Pat D 18:15:23 07/24/10 (29)
- I am truly very sorry if you believe - E-Stat 18:33:00 07/26/10 (28)
- Irrelevant remarks. - Pat D 19:20:11 07/26/10 (27)
- Absolutely - E-Stat 05:59:31 07/27/10 (26)
- RE: Absolutely - Pat D 09:03:08 07/27/10 (25)
- Simple - E-Stat 09:28:28 07/27/10 (24)
- You are totally confused. - Pat D 20:04:52 07/28/10 (23)
- Apparently, you are unaware of how dated your source is - E-Stat 07:30:13 07/29/10 (22)
- It's not my source but one Analog Scott was using to make some point or other. - Pat D 12:18:16 07/29/10 (21)
- I caught Analog Scott out on two things. - Analog Scott 07:30:08 07/30/10 (16)
- RE: I caught Analog Scott out on two things. - Pat D 18:39:14 07/31/10 (15)
- Gotta hand it to ya Pat. you never have been one to let facts get in your way - Analog Scott 19:54:14 07/31/10 (14)
- When you have to hurl personal accusations to prove your point, youve already lost the argument. - Pat D 20:29:55 08/03/10 (13)
- Let me know when that happens. - Analog Scott 17:15:39 08/04/10 (11)
- Well, you may have points, but no real arguments for them. - Pat D 17:37:08 08/05/10 (10)
- You have no arguments that I have no argument - Analog Scott 13:42:52 08/06/10 (9)
- I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - kerr 08:31:19 08/08/10 (8)
- RE: I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - Analog Scott 17:48:03 08/08/10 (4)
- RE: I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - kerr 06:27:37 08/09/10 (3)
- RE: I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - Analog Scott 02:43:37 08/11/10 (2)
- RE: I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - kerr 05:39:56 08/11/10 (1)
- Now I have the rightmost post in "classic view". nt - kurt s 07:19:31 08/12/10 (0)
- RE: I wonder if he will post an argument to your argument that he has no argument against your argument. - Tony Lauck 09:51:28 08/08/10 (2)
- I got to the part about... - kerr 06:28:49 08/09/10 (1)
- RE: I got to the part about... - Tony Lauck 10:48:47 08/09/10 (0)
- I missed the connection between the title of your post and the content. nt - Tony Lauck 09:27:39 08/04/10 (0)
- Congratulations - E-Stat 12:51:44 07/29/10 (3)
- "Yeah, your wording was an absolute hoot." - robert young 17:59:46 07/29/10 (2)
- RE: "Yeah, your wording was an absolute hoot." - Tony Lauck 18:55:49 07/29/10 (1)
- RE: "Yeah, your wording was an absolute hoot." - robert young 00:40:31 07/30/10 (0)
- And what's more.... - robert young 16:58:42 07/24/10 (9)
- RE: And what's more.... - Pat D 18:32:39 07/24/10 (8)
- I'm still laughing... - robert young 20:44:50 07/24/10 (7)
- LOL - Pat D 05:27:05 07/25/10 (6)
- No, not THAT world, Pat. - carcass93 08:15:30 07/25/10 (2)
- Yeah, illusions can be fun. - Pat D 09:23:26 07/25/10 (1)
- I suppose - kerr 04:38:48 07/26/10 (0)
- An adult using LOL and GMAB.... - robert young 07:40:17 07/25/10 (2)
- Hmmm . . . I learned most of such acronym here at AA. (nt) - Pat D 09:24:50 07/25/10 (1)
- Oh, GMAB! - kerr 04:40:30 07/26/10 (0)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Donald North 15:14:09 07/20/10 (14)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Pat D 23:47:20 07/22/10 (13)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Donald North 18:31:28 07/23/10 (12)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Pat D 19:14:59 07/23/10 (11)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - josh358 05:53:07 07/24/10 (10)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Pat D 16:14:46 07/24/10 (9)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - josh358 17:14:07 07/24/10 (8)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Pat D 18:40:25 07/24/10 (7)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - josh358 20:10:08 07/24/10 (0)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Tony Lauck 19:11:48 07/24/10 (5)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Donald North 11:54:27 07/25/10 (0)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Pat D 05:30:32 07/25/10 (3)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Tony Lauck 07:53:44 07/25/10 (2)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - morricab 13:37:01 07/25/10 (1)
- RE: Protocols aside, all the 'good' objectivists want.... - Tony Lauck 17:51:10 07/25/10 (0)
- Highly Suspicious of Meta-Analysis - Tony Lauck 09:41:05 07/20/10 (2)
- RE: Highly Suspicious of Meta-Analysis - Analog Scott 10:34:57 07/20/10 (1)
- RE: Highly Suspicious of Meta-Analysis - Tony Lauck 12:47:53 07/20/10 (0)
- So IOW, objectivists are biased because they believe in bias? - Presto 21:28:17 07/19/10 (8)
- Not what I am saying at all but... - Analog Scott 09:49:09 07/20/10 (7)
- RE: Not what I am saying at all but... - thetubeguy1954 15:04:41 07/21/10 (6)
- Did any of the objetivists even understand the point you wre trying to make A.S.? - Analog Scott 02:37:05 07/22/10 (0)
- You will never convince a skeptic with evidence - Tony Lauck 17:49:12 07/21/10 (4)
- You just define skeptic that way. - Pat D 08:26:09 07/22/10 (3)
- RE: You just define skeptic that way. - josh358 19:36:24 07/22/10 (0)
- RE: You just define skeptic that way. - Tony Lauck 10:22:19 07/22/10 (1)
- RE: You just define skeptic that way. - Pat D 19:19:22 07/22/10 (0)
Follow Ups
- Yeah, illusions can be fun. - Pat D 09:23:26 07/25/10 (1)
- I suppose - kerr 04:38:48 07/26/10 (0)