What are you trying to imply?

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - carcass93 12:14:29 06/24/10 (152)

Looks like they locked the thread down over on HA - Analog Scott 08:17:26 07/04/10 (1)

You're not alone - several people there said something to that extent. - carcass93 10:00:42 07/04/10 (0)

It's an expression of Sean Olive's preferences for listening to stereo recordings. - Pat D 02:03:03 07/02/10 (40)

Pat, to put it bluntly: nobody here gives a damn.... - carcass93 12:30:24 07/02/10 (6)

I tried to tell others what your purpose was . . . - Pat D 12:36:08 07/02/10 (5)

It isn't that no one believed you, Pat... - robert young 14:46:32 07/02/10 (3)

I'm begging you - please tell me it was obvious what my purpose was. - carcass93 18:08:00 07/02/10 (1)

I hope it was to entertain me. - robert young 20:07:45 07/02/10 (0)

Gee, that's funny - E-Stat 15:10:47 07/02/10 (0)

I'm always at a loss of words when somebody pretends... - carcass93 13:01:50 07/02/10 (0)

Clearly he prefers - E-Stat 08:34:39 07/02/10 (32)

RE: Clearly he prefers - Pat D 08:45:24 07/02/10 (31)

"It's an expression of Sean Olive's preferences for listening to stereo recordings." - Analog Scott 09:03:10 07/04/10 (3)

RE: "It's an expression of Sean Olive's preferences for listening to stereo recordings." - Phelonious Ponk 05:57:20 07/06/10 (2)

RE: "It's an expression of Sean Olive's preferences for listening to stereo recordings." - Analog Scott 06:00:39 07/06/10 (1)

RE: "It's an expression of Sean Olive's preferences for listening to stereo recordings." - Phelonious Ponk 14:17:41 07/06/10 (0)

Follow the link - E-Stat 09:00:23 07/02/10 (26)

RE: Follow the link - Pat D 10:32:49 07/02/10 (25)

Tell me - E-Stat 11:03:58 07/02/10 (24)

RE: Tell me - Pat D 11:45:41 07/02/10 (23)

Once again you have an aversion to answering simple questions - E-Stat 12:03:10 07/02/10 (22)

Actually, I did answer it. I said it was irrelevant. (nt) - Pat D 12:15:23 07/02/10 (21)

In that case, we'll ignore your uninformed speculations -nt - E-Stat 12:49:41 07/02/10 (20)

It's mentioned in the link you already provided. - Pat D 19:36:01 07/02/10 (19)

What suddenly caused the webpage - E-Stat 21:16:07 07/02/10 (18)

What are you trying to imply? - Pat D 07:41:37 07/03/10 (17)

Yes, implying! What is the relevance? - Pat D 08:47:23 07/03/10 (15)

I read fine about the availability to do such in cars - E-Stat 09:01:24 07/03/10 (14)

HT, home audio, car audio, PC and Mac . . . versatile software. - Pat D 09:28:23 07/03/10 (13)

We have now returned full circle to my original observation - E-Stat 09:31:24 07/03/10 (12)

Now you're changing your story to be more correct! - Pat D 11:46:03 07/03/10 (11)

What makes you think that the "Logic 7 car stereo decoder" - E-Stat 11:48:36 07/03/10 (10)

Did I make a pronouncement either way on that? - Pat D 16:08:48 07/03/10 (9)

The core kernel... - E-Stat 07:25:59 07/04/10 (8)

RE: In other words, it isn't -nt - theaudiohobby 02:59:11 07/06/10 (7)

Nonsense. It works identically - E-Stat 09:21:25 07/06/10 (6)

RE: As expected, you've modified your comments, it's now - theaudiohobby 12:03:12 07/06/10 (5)

What other standpoint is there? - E-Stat 12:12:37 07/06/10 (4)

RE: What other standpoint is there? - Tony Lauck 13:00:23 07/06/10 (3)

Let's return to the context of this discussion - E-Stat 13:18:41 07/06/10 (2)

Pat's Authority is Peddling this stuff... - Tony Lauck 14:04:42 07/06/10 (1)

"Peddling" indeed - E-Stat 14:20:23 07/06/10 (0)

Imply? - E-Stat 07:58:27 07/03/10 (0)

RE: Since music reproduction is imagined anyway... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 08:41:38 06/29/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - rjd 20:32:17 06/26/10 (0)

That "sense of envelopment and spaciousness" . . . - caspian@peak.org 11:23:05 06/26/10 (2)

RE: That "sense of envelopment and spaciousness" . . . - Pat D 17:18:45 07/01/10 (1)

Audience vs. performer perspective - caspian@peak.org 13:25:56 07/04/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Phelonious Ponk 05:17:15 06/26/10 (36)

OMG - Dawnrazor 23:28:32 07/04/10 (3)

RE: OMG - Phelonious Ponk 05:21:53 07/05/10 (2)

Yet, in Wilson ads... - E-Stat 09:14:33 07/05/10 (1)

RE: Yet, in Wilson ads... - Phelonious Ponk 06:10:42 07/07/10 (0)

OK... how about a test in linked HA thread - is that also advancing "science"? - carcass93 09:10:02 06/28/10 (23)

RE: OK... how about a test in linked HA thread - is that also advancing "science"? - Phelonious Ponk 17:56:55 06/28/10 (0)

LOL! You should get your facts straight . . . - Pat D 10:53:54 06/28/10 (21)

I love when somebody like you takes exception - helps everybody to see your depth,... - carcass93 11:21:18 06/28/10 (20)

I should correct you on your logic, too. - Pat D 20:31:11 07/02/10 (18)

Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - robert young 09:14:39 07/03/10 (15)

RE: Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - Tony Lauck 07:24:46 07/05/10 (7)

Mellowed? I would hope so - E-Stat 09:08:29 07/05/10 (1)

Nothing has changed in the 4 years since... - robert young 11:40:32 07/05/10 (0)

He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - robert young 07:32:44 07/05/10 (4)

RE: He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - Pat D 10:34:44 07/05/10 (3)

RE: He acts like it wasn't his responsibility... - robert young 05:09:10 07/06/10 (2)

His posts tended to be lossy, too. :) -nt - E-Stat 10:45:35 07/06/10 (1)

If he were here, he'd demand an immediate apology for your inflammatory post :) (nt) - kerr 09:18:38 07/09/10 (0)

RE: Why did you post a link to jj's bio? - Pat D 17:32:22 07/04/10 (4)

"not know who jj is" - yeah... like that's possible. - carcass93 08:00:44 07/05/10 (0)

No "problem with that." - robert young 05:04:23 07/05/10 (2)

RE: No "problem with that." - Pat D 10:32:34 07/05/10 (1)

Missed my own typo! - robert young 05:10:19 07/06/10 (0)

I, too, posted a jj link! - Tony Lauck 14:31:35 07/03/10 (1)

I'd be worried about you too... - robert young 15:20:47 07/03/10 (0)

Who are the Grand Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 07:45:32 07/03/10 (1)

{Ego meets Cognitive dissonance} "I heard you twice the first time" ~NT - Cleantimestream 08:02:27 07/14/10 (0)

Have you compared Sean Olive's multi-channel system with stereo? - Pat D 12:01:15 06/28/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Analog Scott 01:02:48 06/27/10 (7)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Phelonious Ponk 04:25:35 06/27/10 (6)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Analog Scott 06:33:53 06/27/10 (5)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Phelonious Ponk 09:06:21 06/27/10 (4)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Analog Scott 09:50:27 06/27/10 (3)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Phelonious Ponk 17:37:23 06/27/10 (2)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Analog Scott 01:44:13 06/28/10 (1)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Phelonious Ponk 03:35:02 06/28/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Todd Krieger 00:02:15 06/26/10 (0)

If I ever heard a MC that impressed me I might be interested, but even then there is the expense of adding - Norm 19:57:33 06/25/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Don Till 18:25:33 06/25/10 (0)

Vertually ALL multichannel is FAKE! - Don_C 15:24:58 06/25/10 (5)

ALL music is FAKE! - Dr. Philosophy 06:45:01 07/03/10 (0)

Fake what? It's all an illusion and its all fake. - Don Till 18:38:11 06/25/10 (1)

It's ALL fake. :-) - Tony Lauck 06:33:41 06/26/10 (0)

You should change that to ALL RECORDINGS ARE FAKE nt - Robert Hamel 18:26:16 06/25/10 (1)

Yabbut some are faker than others... (nt) - Presto 22:37:11 07/04/10 (0)

I enjoy both - Robert Hamel 15:02:59 06/25/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - tomservo 09:25:35 06/25/10 (0)

Simple - kerr 07:22:40 06/25/10 (0)

a few thoughts. after all this was a conversation i was having with Sean.. - Analog Scott 04:13:30 06/25/10 (43)

BTW, there is a use for the VPI Bricks - E-Stat 13:24:42 06/25/10 (0)

Sean Olive? -nt - E-Stat 10:42:23 06/25/10 (41)

Bingo. N/T - carcass93 10:45:28 06/25/10 (40)

I was reading his latest blog - E-Stat 12:12:06 06/25/10 (39)

It's pretty amusing to watch him butting heads with AJinFLA over on Hydrogen,... - carcass93 12:40:40 06/25/10 (38)

It's pretty amusing to watch c-93 misuse the English language. - Pat D 14:15:21 06/29/10 (37)

Did you write that? It's terrible English. - robert young 15:09:41 06/30/10 (36)

Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Pat D 18:36:02 06/30/10 (35)

So you can somehow tell what posts I read? - robert young 04:26:00 07/01/10 (12)

RE: So you can somehow tell what posts I read? - Pat D 07:34:24 07/01/10 (11)

You're lost in translation, Pat. - robert young 13:03:40 07/01/10 (4)

So where was c93 "spot on?" - Pat D 16:24:12 07/01/10 (3)

Umm, he got two out of three. You identified the one, so the answer must be the other two. - robert young 09:43:59 07/02/10 (2)

RE: Umm, he got two out of three. You identified the one, so the answer must be the other two. - Pat D 10:45:01 07/02/10 (1)

It is geting worse for you. But it IS amusing to witness. - robert young 14:42:27 07/02/10 (0)

You're still not being very clear - E-Stat 08:27:38 07/01/10 (5)

Center channel. - Pat D 10:37:12 07/01/10 (4)

You chose to NOT answer my question - E-Stat 10:51:26 07/01/10 (3)

If you want Sean Olive's opinion, ask him. - Pat D 12:29:29 07/01/10 (2)

Curious backpeddling - E-Stat 12:37:40 07/01/10 (1)

Not me. - Pat D 12:48:10 07/01/10 (0)

RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Tony Lauck 19:30:35 06/30/10 (21)

RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Pat D 07:31:22 07/01/10 (20)

RE: Since you haven't followed the discussion . . . - Tony Lauck 08:07:05 07/01/10 (19)

Nonsense. - Pat D 10:17:16 07/01/10 (18)

Please stop embarrassing yourself. - robert young 13:14:01 07/01/10 (2)

Why don't you read the whole text for context? - Pat D 14:14:18 07/01/10 (1)

I did, and many here have, and you're still wrong... - robert young 04:47:58 07/02/10 (0)

I decline to take a third dip in your pool of confusion. nt - Tony Lauck 12:01:16 07/01/10 (14)

You're the one confused. - Pat D 01:53:07 07/02/10 (13)

Read Olive's quote again Pat: the system is not a specific one. - robert young 05:39:22 07/02/10 (12)

Changes nothing relevant. - Pat D 08:39:14 07/02/10 (8)

But I didn't atack Sean, I attacked your interpretation of what he wrote. - robert young 09:29:27 07/02/10 (7)

I never said *you* did. - Pat D 10:32:02 07/02/10 (6)

RE: I never said *you* did. - robert young 20:05:03 07/02/10 (5)

What I did in concurring with C93's observation - E-Stat 07:49:54 07/03/10 (4)

It's is - if he's your idol, that you worship, and are never allowed to question. N/T - carcass93 08:28:06 07/03/10 (3)

Naw, you're my idol (nt) - Pat D 16:10:01 07/03/10 (2)

Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - kerr 05:10:07 07/04/10 (1)

RE: Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - Pat D 17:34:34 07/04/10 (0)

RE: Read Olive's quote again Pat: the system is not a specific one. - Tony Lauck 07:08:17 07/02/10 (2)

RE: HA - rick_m 08:46:17 07/04/10 (0)

"why HA continues to exist" - it's a social club, that just happens... - carcass93 18:34:47 07/02/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Tony Lauck 14:34:55 06/24/10 (2)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - kerr 07:20:08 06/25/10 (1)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Tony Lauck 07:32:54 06/25/10 (0)

"Real multichannel" - E-Stat 12:44:12 06/24/10 (3)

Are you sayin... - mkuller 19:08:35 06/24/10 (1)

I remember hearing my first Quadraphonic recording - E-Stat 06:09:59 06/25/10 (0)

Eloquently put. I agree 1000% (nt) - Presto 12:55:16 06/24/10 (0)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - Presto 12:38:32 06/24/10 (3)

RE: Stereo vs. multichannel: what are your thoughts on this statement (inside). - soulfood 06:02:03 06/26/10 (0)

See - we can actually agree on something! But my point is this: - carcass93 12:56:51 06/24/10 (1)

Naturally - E-Stat 13:22:53 06/24/10 (0)

Follow Ups

What are you trying to imply? - Pat D 07:41:37 07/03/10 (17)

Yes, implying! What is the relevance? - Pat D 08:47:23 07/03/10 (15)

I read fine about the availability to do such in cars - E-Stat 09:01:24 07/03/10 (14)

HT, home audio, car audio, PC and Mac . . . versatile software. - Pat D 09:28:23 07/03/10 (13)

We have now returned full circle to my original observation - E-Stat 09:31:24 07/03/10 (12)

Now you're changing your story to be more correct! - Pat D 11:46:03 07/03/10 (11)

What makes you think that the "Logic 7 car stereo decoder" - E-Stat 11:48:36 07/03/10 (10)

Did I make a pronouncement either way on that? - Pat D 16:08:48 07/03/10 (9)

The core kernel... - E-Stat 07:25:59 07/04/10 (8)

RE: In other words, it isn't -nt - theaudiohobby 02:59:11 07/06/10 (7)

Nonsense. It works identically - E-Stat 09:21:25 07/06/10 (6)

RE: As expected, you've modified your comments, it's now - theaudiohobby 12:03:12 07/06/10 (5)

What other standpoint is there? - E-Stat 12:12:37 07/06/10 (4)

RE: What other standpoint is there? - Tony Lauck 13:00:23 07/06/10 (3)

Let's return to the context of this discussion - E-Stat 13:18:41 07/06/10 (2)

Pat's Authority is Peddling this stuff... - Tony Lauck 14:04:42 07/06/10 (1)

"Peddling" indeed - E-Stat 14:20:23 07/06/10 (0)

Imply? - E-Stat 07:58:27 07/03/10 (0)

Post a Message!