In Reply to: Read Olive's quote again Pat: the system is not a specific one. posted by robert young on July 2, 2010 at 05:39:22:
"He is describing a type of multi-speaker arrangement, not a specific one."
That's still more particular than just "stereo," whether it be one or two systems. That's particular in logic as opposed to universal. Of course, he could have more than one type of upmixer and utilize a single system to listen with 7, 5, or 2 channels. In any case, 2 channel stereo as such doesn't give him what he prefers.
Now, can we infer anything at all about the quality of stereo available to him? Not really, just that he prefers a type of multi-speaker arrangement and upmixing of stereo to 5 or 7 channels. Not everyone prefers to listen to stereo in multichannel, but because Sean does is no reason to attack his qualifications and credibility as a researcher.
I am surprised you and Tony would justify an attempt to attack, based on no evidence whatever, the qualifications and credibility of a researcher like Sean Olive, because IMHO, that's basically why this thread was started.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Changes nothing relevant. - Pat D 08:39:14 07/02/10 (8)
- But I didn't atack Sean, I attacked your interpretation of what he wrote. - robert young 09:29:27 07/02/10 (7)
- I never said *you* did. - Pat D 10:32:02 07/02/10 (6)
- RE: I never said *you* did. - robert young 20:05:03 07/02/10 (5)
- What I did in concurring with C93's observation - E-Stat 07:49:54 07/03/10 (4)
- It's is - if he's your idol, that you worship, and are never allowed to question. N/T - carcass93 08:28:06 07/03/10 (3)
- Naw, you're my idol (nt) - Pat D 16:10:01 07/03/10 (2)
- Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - kerr 05:10:07 07/04/10 (1)
- RE: Is that the "whether you mean it or not" part of Flanders & Swan? :) - Pat D 17:34:34 07/04/10 (0)