Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Well then what's their take? posted by Don Till on June 9, 2010 at 08:10:34:
Perhaps you should re-read the engineer's comments again. I find their language quite clear.
but I think even more obviously RFI and/or noise effects these "dimensions".
They are most certainly among, but not solely responsible for, the factors which influence the perception of high resolution or transparency.
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Speaker Cable Differences Measured - Jon Risch 17:38:12 05/26/10 (330)
- Risch says - Kristian 14:40:31 07/01/10 (0)
- Is there a reason why we should care? - Don Till 08:48:43 06/03/10 (101)
- No reason to care unless you buy things - tomservo 07:12:10 06/04/10 (81)
- RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Jon Risch 10:58:37 06/06/10 (12)
- RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - tomservo 14:40:08 06/13/10 (0)
- You're right such test don't mean anything - Don Till 21:16:54 06/08/10 (0)
- RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - mls-stl 12:49:19 06/06/10 (9)
- I asked this before, but let me try again - how is that "cumulative evidence",... - carcass93 08:47:18 06/09/10 (2)
- You're misreading my comment - mls-stl 14:48:00 06/09/10 (1)
- RE: You're misreading my comment - kerr 07:20:40 06/10/10 (0)
- Evidence? - Jon Risch 19:12:07 06/08/10 (5)
- RE: Evidence? - mls-stl 05:46:35 06/09/10 (4)
- What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - Norm 14:05:09 06/09/10 (3)
- RE: What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - mls-stl 16:53:12 06/09/10 (1)
- I might suggest some problems I have with what you say but totally agree with your last statement. - Norm 14:26:01 06/11/10 (0)
- RE: What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - Tony Lauck 14:31:48 06/09/10 (0)
- RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Presto 10:35:35 06/05/10 (1)
- RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Pat D 16:16:37 06/05/10 (0)
- nice response - Don Till 09:55:03 06/05/10 (65)
- RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 11:49:47 06/05/10 (64)
- RE: nice response - Pat D 15:54:39 06/05/10 (36)
- RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 18:45:35 06/05/10 (35)
- How rich can it get? - Don Till 07:49:11 06/06/10 (34)
- "As if one might not find a woman beautiful because of her intelligence." - robert young 10:11:20 06/06/10 (33)
- It's exactly on topic and to the point of contention - Don Till 10:43:34 06/06/10 (32)
- It may be "on topic" but it demonstrates.... - robert young 14:14:13 06/06/10 (31)
- Maybe you can just move on.... - Don Till 12:39:45 06/08/10 (30)
- Are you really this clueless, or do you just play so on propheads? - robert young 13:03:48 06/08/10 (29)
- Read this - I haven't decided if you really this dense or trying to get some payback for being made of fool on - Don Till 13:14:05 06/08/10 (28)
- Your subject line isn't even coherent english... - robert young 06:54:38 06/09/10 (4)
- This is my last effort to help you - if you still don't "get it" just move on. - Don Till 08:35:50 06/09/10 (3)
- Another Don T epic fail.... - robert young 10:21:29 06/09/10 (2)
- I get it. You made up a topic and have been fooling me into thinking you were trying to join in on this one! - Don Till 12:40:59 06/09/10 (1)
- No need for me to continue to point out your ignorance. - robert young 13:23:49 06/09/10 (0)
- Funny... - Tony Lauck 13:59:02 06/08/10 (22)
- Unfortunately.... - Don Till 21:01:44 06/08/10 (20)
- clueless - Tony Lauck 07:11:23 06/09/10 (19)
- So? - Don Till 08:12:27 06/09/10 (18)
- RE: So? - Tony Lauck 08:42:47 06/09/10 (17)
- Not really Tony... - Don Till 08:49:29 06/09/10 (16)
- Hysterical!! - robert young 10:25:58 06/09/10 (0)
- I already agreed with you.... - Tony Lauck 09:03:52 06/09/10 (14)
- I know you said that you agree with me but I don't agree with you. - Don Till 12:57:23 06/09/10 (13)
- Clearly we disagree about agreement. - Tony Lauck 13:56:52 06/09/10 (12)
- Like that TT that picks up voices spoken in the listening room your amp is broken.... - Don Till 08:49:24 06/17/10 (7)
- It seems you simply can't comprehend what you read. - robert young 12:02:00 06/17/10 (6)
- Logical Boostrap Problem - Tony Lauck 12:52:10 06/17/10 (5)
- No it's a programming error - Don Till 19:23:11 06/17/10 (3)
- That analogy is so tortured.... - robert young 13:26:26 06/18/10 (2)
- THE MOMMY RETURNS! - Don Till 10:10:33 06/20/10 (1)
- Weak, but not unexpected. - robert young 19:49:59 06/20/10 (0)
- Do you remember the great Python skit... - robert young 13:31:26 06/17/10 (0)
- Sure..... - Don Till 21:12:55 06/11/10 (3)
- RE: Sure..... - Tony Lauck 06:05:40 06/12/10 (2)
- No Tony - Don Till 16:51:53 06/16/10 (1)
- Must be some big conspiracy of stoopud that keeps everyone from falling into line with your "reasoning." - robert young 18:20:28 06/16/10 (0)
- Good point - E-Stat 14:24:00 06/08/10 (0)
- Well said! - E-Stat 12:09:48 06/05/10 (26)
- Maybe you can clarify what's so well about it? - Don Till 13:44:43 06/05/10 (25)
- My suggestion to you - E-Stat 14:54:52 06/05/10 (24)
- Come now E-Stat - Don Till 17:04:19 06/05/10 (21)
- At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - E-Stat 19:39:40 06/05/10 (20)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - Don Till 07:29:42 06/06/10 (19)
- The *someone* - E-Stat 08:55:55 06/06/10 (18)
- Technical dimension? - Don Till 13:22:09 06/08/10 (10)
- Do you need assistance understanding the term "recording engineer"? -nt - E-Stat 13:40:20 06/08/10 (9)
- He's still pimping his stuff - duh! - Don Till 21:08:52 06/08/10 (8)
- Regardless of your insults - E-Stat 05:57:56 06/09/10 (7)
- Well then what's their take? - Don Till 08:10:34 06/09/10 (6)
- What is their take? - E-Stat 08:24:50 06/09/10 (5)
- Ok then why the applaud for the original comment? - Don Till 08:47:10 06/09/10 (4)
- Evidently - E-Stat 09:03:57 06/09/10 (3)
- You need to tie these spectra to resolution* independent of noise in order for your comment to be relative - Don Till 12:34:24 06/09/10 (2)
- Yes, kids it's another episode of... - E-Stat 13:37:08 06/09/10 (1)
- You didn't bother making an excuse, I apologize I thought you might try to avoid this kind of name calling... - Don Till 21:19:09 06/11/10 (0)
- That's laughable! - Don Till 10:07:05 06/06/10 (6)
- Reading retention=zero - E-Stat 10:46:38 06/06/10 (5)
- Giving you the benefit of the doubt you must have forgotten what we were talking about! - Don Till 11:32:01 06/06/10 (4)
- Not at all - E-Stat 12:59:29 06/06/10 (3)
- You've answered nothing - Don Till 12:44:53 06/08/10 (2)
- When all else fails, deny everything! :) -nt - E-Stat 12:45:53 06/08/10 (1)
- I'm not denying anything - you're the one posting smoke! - Don Till 13:02:29 06/08/10 (0)
- RE: My suggestion to you - Pat D 16:01:10 06/05/10 (1)
- May you enjoy you lack of awareness -nt - E-Stat 19:38:10 06/05/10 (0)
- "Backasswards and ugly?" - E-Stat 11:40:42 06/03/10 (18)
- If I didn't know better... - kerr 17:20:09 06/03/10 (17)
- That boulder will turn to gold - just ask an alchemist. You probably should help it somewhat though. N/T - carcass93 19:16:34 06/03/10 (16)
- Those expensive interconnects and cables have turned to gold for the sellers! (nt) - Pat D 04:40:27 06/04/10 (15)
- You think so, huh? Is that they're all going out of business? - Sordidman 10:18:14 06/07/10 (8)
- Well in a down economy people don't have money to easily part with - Don Till 12:53:37 06/08/10 (5)
- Didn't say that: clearly. - Sordidman 13:54:47 06/08/10 (4)
- True you asked why they were going out of business - I tried to answer. - Don Till 21:33:56 06/08/10 (3)
- Yes, Thanks, I wasn't seriously asking: for even PatD knows - Sordidman 16:50:21 06/09/10 (2)
- Sorry, but selling an audio cable for several thousand dollars is lucrative. - Pat D 16:56:23 06/20/10 (1)
- Not if all of the company's are not selling them, and not staying in business -t - Sordidman 16:06:49 06/25/10 (0)
- Yep - just a bad habit of whining about something he has nothing to do with. - carcass93 14:24:11 06/07/10 (1)
- RE: Yep - just a bad habit of whining about something he has nothing to do with. - kerr 07:18:31 06/08/10 (0)
- Here's paradox: - carcass93 10:17:53 06/04/10 (5)
- We've all heard those Chinese DVD players - E-Stat 14:48:10 06/04/10 (1)
- I held out for the SD4900 - Presto 15:38:55 06/04/10 (0)
- RE: Here's paradox: - kerr 10:49:18 06/04/10 (2)
- RE: Here's paradox: - tomservo 12:49:28 06/04/10 (1)
- RE: Here's paradox: - kerr 15:33:10 06/04/10 (0)
- Poop Heads - briggs 07:01:57 06/03/10 (2)
- RE: Poop Heads - tomservo 09:09:08 06/04/10 (1)
- RE: Poop Heads - kerr 10:48:11 06/04/10 (0)
- Jon, thanks for a great thread for PHP! - kerr 04:44:15 06/03/10 (3)
- Yes, there is agreement - E-Stat 06:55:40 06/03/10 (2)
- RE: Yes, there is agreement - kerr 08:18:24 06/03/10 (1)
- Indeed :) -nt - E-Stat 08:33:18 06/03/10 (0)
- Strange - gymwear5@hotmail.com 08:45:24 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: Strange - Jon Risch 19:29:18 06/01/10 (0)
- RE: Speaker Cable Differences Measured - Cleantimestream 11:53:00 05/29/10 (7)
- Exactly. This is what I was saying... - Presto 21:24:52 05/29/10 (6)
- Yes but no.... - Don Till 07:35:50 05/31/10 (5)
- RE: Yes but no.... - Presto 11:04:57 05/31/10 (4)
- RE: Yes but no.... - mls-stl 14:12:09 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: Yes but no.... - Tony Lauck 08:00:27 06/03/10 (0)
- Well I admit.... - Don Till 16:05:16 05/31/10 (0)
- RE: Yes but no.... - kerr 13:36:55 05/31/10 (0)
- Thanks for the posting. You can see that it will have no impact. Facts don't matter in faith discussions. nt - Norm 08:16:59 05/29/10 (11)
- RE: Thanks for the posting. You can see that it will have no impact. Facts don't matter in faith discussions. nt - tomservo 09:39:59 06/04/10 (0)
- Aren't you basing your statement on YOUR faith in the person taking the measurements, the equipment used... - artemus 10:45:23 05/30/10 (8)
- Science is a faith in data, transparency of method, and replication. - Norm 06:31:41 05/31/10 (7)
- RE: Science is a faith in data, transparency of method, and replication. - Tony Lauck 15:43:15 05/31/10 (6)
- Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - Norm 14:46:52 06/07/10 (5)
- RE: Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - rick_m 08:23:18 06/10/10 (0)
- Oh but we can measure it. - morricab 03:08:49 06/08/10 (2)
- I think virtually everyone now finds THD useless. nt - Norm 14:07:32 06/09/10 (1)
- RE: I think virtually everyone now finds THD useless. nt - morricab 14:33:09 06/10/10 (0)
- RE: Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - Tony Lauck 14:53:58 06/07/10 (0)
- Hah hah hah hah hah hha aahhhhhh wtf. who cares.... - Elizabeth 08:43:44 05/30/10 (0)
- I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 17:51:00 05/28/10 (78)
- So, all the measuress you took to eliminate gross inadequacies... - carcass93 08:51:30 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: So, all the measuress you took to eliminate gross inadequacies... - Presto 16:23:26 06/04/10 (0)
- RE: I find it sort of funny.... - benie 19:13:50 05/29/10 (15)
- Well, - Presto 20:52:51 05/29/10 (14)
- RE: Well, - benie 03:38:44 05/30/10 (13)
- But you make it sound... - Presto 19:33:21 05/30/10 (12)
- RE: But you make it sound... - benie 22:21:02 05/30/10 (11)
- RE: But you make it sound... - tomservo 16:19:11 06/04/10 (3)
- RE: But you make it sound... - benie 17:12:37 06/04/10 (2)
- RE: But you make it sound... - tomservo 17:28:27 06/04/10 (1)
- RE: But you make it sound... - benie 02:30:27 06/06/10 (0)
- Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Presto 08:46:16 05/31/10 (6)
- RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Davey 09:45:50 05/31/10 (5)
- RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Presto 11:00:06 05/31/10 (4)
- Ring dome tweeters - caspian@peak.org 18:10:26 05/31/10 (1)
- RE: Ring dome tweeters - Presto 09:45:32 06/03/10 (0)
- RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Davey 17:38:01 05/31/10 (1)
- RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Tony Lauck 06:54:02 06/03/10 (0)
- You can easily save yourself from tweak insanity; don't buy any. But why do you think you should tell others?* - Norm 08:14:33 05/29/10 (8)
- Why to subjectivists insist on telling others about their illusions? - Pat D 09:48:05 05/30/10 (6)
- "Hoist on your own petard????" Hardly! - Norm 20:21:56 06/17/10 (0)
- I've only shared two illusions on this site (so far) - kerr 09:46:16 06/01/10 (0)
- Why do pathological objectionists insist on projecting their hearing and/or... - carcass93 08:56:24 06/01/10 (3)
- Umm . . . the trick doesn't work so well after everyone has seen it. - Pat D 14:40:29 06/01/10 (2)
- No idea what you're referring to, but here's my best guess: - carcass93 15:00:14 06/01/10 (1)
- See! I told you, but . . . (nt) - Pat D 15:18:08 06/01/10 (0)
- RE: You can easily save yourself from tweak insanity; don't buy any. But why do you think you should tell others?* - Presto 20:50:39 05/29/10 (0)
- RE: I find it sort of funny.... - KlausR. 22:13:27 05/28/10 (50)
- RE: I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 01:09:02 05/29/10 (49)
- I just used single driver loudspeakers - morricab 05:38:23 06/02/10 (0)
- RE: I find it sort of funny.... - KlausR. 10:41:39 05/29/10 (47)
- RE: I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 21:21:46 05/29/10 (46)
- Re: so I don't think I can exchange with you on an eye-to-eye level - KlausR. 10:20:07 05/30/10 (45)
- You've opened a marvelous worm can here... - Presto 19:41:16 05/30/10 (44)
- Flat anechoically or in room? - morricab 05:26:16 06/03/10 (0)
- Opening worm cans is a specialty of mine! - KlausR. 21:56:32 05/31/10 (42)
- RE: Opening worm cans is a specialty of mine! - Tony Lauck 07:18:13 06/03/10 (39)
- RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - KlausR. 00:55:19 06/04/10 (38)
- That's great... - E-Stat 12:12:16 06/05/10 (0)
- RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - tomservo 16:35:55 06/04/10 (1)
- RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - KlausR. 23:23:47 06/05/10 (0)
- RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - Tony Lauck 06:40:14 06/04/10 (34)
- "measuring flat" is Klaus' intolerant straw man - Sordidman 16:18:02 06/04/10 (33)
- So having preferences different from yours constitutes "intolerance" and "blind arrogance?" (nt) - Pat D 16:05:45 06/05/10 (32)
- Nope, blind faith in poor measurements and denigrating experience does -t - Sordidman 10:54:25 06/07/10 (31)
- Measurements work for KlausR. What's your problem? - Pat D 16:46:00 06/07/10 (30)
- Misreading again? I said, nor implied nothing of the kind - Sordidman 10:45:25 06/08/10 (29)
- RE: erroneous conclusions - KlausR. 04:38:42 06/09/10 (26)
- ""which criteria happened to be non-subjective"" - Sordidman 16:55:14 06/09/10 (23)
- RE: ""which criteria happened to be non-subjective"" - Tony Lauck 08:37:28 06/10/10 (1)
- Design as you go; then make adjustments - Sordidman 09:40:58 06/10/10 (0)
- RE: Good sound is the goal, and it is entirely subjective. - KlausR. 21:55:21 06/09/10 (20)
- It's either a "fact" or it isn't - Sordidman 09:32:46 06/10/10 (19)
- There is no defintion for art, but audio definitely is not art! - KlausR. 22:04:28 06/10/10 (18)
- Not your decision: Art is whatever any artist says it is.... - Sordidman 09:40:23 06/11/10 (17)
- RE: That is clearly crap - KlausR. 13:38:08 06/12/10 (9)
- Case Closed? Not -- I doubt it will ever be closed. - Tony Lauck 10:39:18 06/13/10 (8)
- Meyer/Moran threads - KlausR. 08:19:20 06/14/10 (7)
- RE: Meyer/Moran threads - Tony Lauck 08:46:22 06/14/10 (6)
- RE: I don't know why you didn't find my posts - KlausR. 14:01:54 06/14/10 (5)
- RE: I don't know why you didn't find my posts - Tony Lauck 15:08:58 06/14/10 (4)
- RE: I have faith in Brad's personal integrity - KlausR. 02:47:48 06/15/10 (3)
- RE: I have faith in Brad's personal integrity - Tony Lauck 08:58:27 06/15/10 (2)
- Some (final) points - KlausR. 09:13:40 06/16/10 (1)
- RE: Some (final) points - Tony Lauck 09:41:45 06/16/10 (0)
- RE: Not your decision: Art is whatever any artist says it is.... - Tony Lauck 11:09:54 06/11/10 (6)
- Accuracy? - Sordidman 12:24:33 06/11/10 (5)
- RE: Accuracy? - Tony Lauck 13:16:58 06/11/10 (4)
- There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Sordidman 14:25:35 06/11/10 (3)
- RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Tony Lauck 15:04:29 06/11/10 (2)
- RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Sordidman 15:43:42 06/11/10 (1)
- RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Tony Lauck 17:33:16 06/11/10 (0)
- RE: erroneous conclusions - Tony Lauck 07:42:27 06/09/10 (1)
- RE: Conflict - KlausR. 21:31:00 06/09/10 (0)
- You just illustrated what I said! (nt) - Pat D 14:47:31 06/08/10 (1)
- No, but Whatever: time to get off the schoolyard (nt) - Sordidman 16:02:20 06/08/10 (0)
- On flat response... - Presto 10:18:29 06/01/10 (1)
- Agreement on all points (nt) - KlausR. 07:34:29 06/02/10 (0)
- Why, does - tesla 16:29:32 05/28/10 (0)
- Objectivists will have to move on to Plan B. - Enophile 22:33:10 05/27/10 (39)
- No plan B needed, actually! - KlausR. 01:04:44 05/28/10 (38)
- Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's - Sordidman 11:27:25 06/02/10 (37)
- RE: Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's audible or not? - KlausR. 00:54:38 06/03/10 (36)
- Denialists must prove DOES NOT - Tony Lauck 07:56:02 06/03/10 (35)
- Nonsense. - Pat D 11:26:42 06/03/10 (33)
- Easy answer - E-Stat 14:26:18 06/03/10 (32)
- Way too easy. - Pat D 15:20:36 06/03/10 (31)
- I agree - E-Stat 15:23:07 06/03/10 (30)
- He asked it because he IS... you know... N/T - carcass93 19:13:53 06/03/10 (29)
- You guys should argue this with Dan Banquer. - Pat D 19:25:32 06/03/10 (28)
- I always defer to the opinion of - E-Stat 19:28:16 06/03/10 (27)
- RE: I always defer to the opinion of - Pat D 20:01:54 06/03/10 (26)
- RE Designs was a one trick pony - E-Stat 06:24:30 06/04/10 (25)
- So you also want to take on jneutron? - Pat D 10:57:38 06/04/10 (24)
- I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - E-Stat 12:20:54 06/04/10 (23)
- RE: I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - Pat D 13:08:43 06/04/10 (22)
- I'll help you out - E-Stat 13:21:13 06/04/10 (21)
- RE: I'll help you out - Pat D 16:11:12 06/04/10 (20)
- Who are you quoting now? - E-Stat 16:54:30 06/04/10 (19)
- RE: Who are you quoting now? - Pat D 10:39:32 06/05/10 (18)
- You continue to miss the point - E-Stat 11:45:02 06/05/10 (17)
- RE: You continue to miss the point - Pat D 14:21:53 06/05/10 (16)
- I give up on your ability - E-Stat 14:57:00 06/05/10 (15)
- The concept is easy--but you haven't established its applicability. - Pat D 07:58:15 06/07/10 (14)
- Are you just realizing this? - E-Stat 08:31:00 06/07/10 (13)
- Ummm . . . - Pat D 10:39:11 06/07/10 (12)
- Boy, you've steered so far off the original course! - E-Stat 11:43:14 06/07/10 (11)
- Your course is confused. - Pat D 15:27:24 06/07/10 (10)
- Time to step back and review your comments :) - E-Stat 06:34:19 06/08/10 (9)
- It's time for you to stop quoting snippets with no context. - Pat D 07:46:22 06/08/10 (8)
- They don't call you "Mr. Teflon" for nothing! :) -nt - E-Stat 07:49:56 06/08/10 (7)
- Why? Because I can slip out of traps and misreadings? (nt) - Pat D 09:28:02 06/08/10 (6)
- Will it go round - E-Stat 12:23:17 06/08/10 (5)
- Your are like the evil Citizen Chauvelin . . . - Pat D 14:46:06 06/08/10 (4)
- Good to see PHP back to its old form! - kerr 15:34:54 06/08/10 (3)
- LOL! - E-Stat 16:26:39 06/08/10 (1)
- RE: LOL! - kerr 18:07:32 06/08/10 (0)
- Just in case... - kerr 15:43:38 06/08/10 (0)
- RE: Denialists must prove DOES NOT - kerr 08:15:37 06/03/10 (0)
- Hi Jon - jneutron 11:19:01 05/27/10 (9)
- Hi John - Jon Risch 19:58:38 06/01/10 (2)
- RE: Hi John - jneutron 06:23:13 06/02/10 (0)
- Your interesting aside... - morricab 05:45:33 06/02/10 (0)
- RE: Hi Jon - Tony Lauck 12:46:19 05/27/10 (5)
- RE: Hi Jon - jneutron 12:56:14 05/27/10 (4)
- RE: Hi Jon - Tony Lauck 13:25:27 05/27/10 (3)
- RE: Hi Jon - jneutron 14:04:05 05/27/10 (2)
- RE: will the objectionists finally allow that there is true evidence of cable differences - KlausR. 23:12:54 05/26/10 (66)
- RE: Take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth! lol - benie 19:05:47 05/29/10 (1)
- You have to speak up - they have their ears plugged with bananas. N/T - carcass93 09:01:00 06/01/10 (0)
- "listening test that shows..." - it shows exactly NOTHING, unless you're participant. - carcass93 10:46:19 05/28/10 (16)
- RE: I don't give a damn - KlausR. 04:43:53 05/29/10 (15)
- When dealing with... - carcass93 08:47:55 06/01/10 (0)
- RE: I don't give a damn - kerr 06:32:00 05/29/10 (13)
- How come they all make the same, tired as it is irrelevant, medical DBT argument? - carcass93 09:18:17 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: How come they all make the same, tired as it is irrelevant, medical DBT argument? - Tony Lauck 07:22:57 06/03/10 (0)
- RE: Side effects - KlausR. 07:49:34 05/29/10 (10)
- RE: Side effects - kerr 08:43:02 05/29/10 (9)
- RE: Any test results that show... - KlausR. 10:53:57 05/29/10 (1)
- RE: Any test results that show... - kerr 06:21:53 05/30/10 (0)
- Scientific Truth - Jon Risch 10:06:22 05/29/10 (6)
- From Earl Geddes distortion papers - morricab 07:15:36 06/03/10 (4)
- RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - andy_c 14:53:43 06/03/10 (3)
- RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - morricab 02:01:23 06/04/10 (2)
- RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - andy_c 08:43:55 06/04/10 (0)
- RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - Tony Lauck 08:08:05 06/04/10 (0)
- RE: Scientific Truth - rick_m 11:45:33 05/29/10 (0)
- RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 05:17:05 05/27/10 (46)
- RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - KlausR. 06:32:33 05/27/10 (8)
- RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - geoffkait 06:58:12 05/27/10 (7)
- And, as usual, your USEFUL contribution so far is zero. - clifff 09:12:13 05/27/10 (0)
- Re: Sorry, Charlie - KlausR. 08:26:37 05/27/10 (5)
- Ouch! Low blow - geoffkait 14:37:11 05/27/10 (4)
- "LOL!" My kids do that. All the time. - clifff 16:22:54 05/27/10 (3)
- So do I. Around here, anyway. (nt) - kerr 06:48:58 05/28/10 (1)
- LOL! (nt) - geoffkait 09:46:24 05/28/10 (0)
- That's nice, Clifffy. Do they write in really short sentences like their Daddy? nt - geoffkait 16:35:10 05/27/10 (0)
- RE: "I'm not aware" - jneutron 05:45:51 05/27/10 (36)
- RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 06:08:24 05/27/10 (35)
- Barko lounger?? Que? - jneutron 09:27:29 05/27/10 (34)
- Barcalounger, the choice of audio skeptics everywhere - geoffkait 09:43:36 05/27/10 (33)
- Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:13:42 05/27/10 (32)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 11:30:27 05/27/10 (31)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:46:05 05/27/10 (30)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 14:35:27 05/27/10 (29)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 05:38:50 05/28/10 (14)
- That reminds me... - E-Stat 12:51:58 06/02/10 (6)
- would you believe... - jneutron 05:56:59 06/03/10 (5)
- I think you would definitely get push back - E-Stat 14:27:11 06/04/10 (4)
- I would not recommend video cable for AC. - jneutron 06:09:13 06/07/10 (0)
- RE: I think you would definitely get push back - Tony Lauck 11:53:13 06/05/10 (2)
- Does video triaxial - E-Stat 16:45:24 06/06/10 (1)
- RE: Does video triaxial - Tony Lauck 17:52:56 06/06/10 (0)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 08:02:26 05/28/10 (0)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - Tony Lauck 07:46:53 05/28/10 (0)
- Good points. - rick_m 07:35:59 05/28/10 (4)
- RE: Good points. - Ugly 22:15:31 05/31/10 (3)
- RE: Good points. - rick_m 07:08:58 06/01/10 (2)
- RE: Good points. - Ugly 12:56:39 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: Good points. - rick_m 10:47:00 06/02/10 (0)
- Nothing wrong with being a skeptic, where it's appropriate. - Tony Lauck 16:58:39 05/27/10 (13)
- I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 03:15:22 05/28/10 (12)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - kerr 06:46:09 05/28/10 (0)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 06:17:26 05/28/10 (10)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 08:26:23 05/28/10 (9)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 10:39:44 05/28/10 (8)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 11:59:54 05/28/10 (7)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:13:35 05/28/10 (6)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - morricab 09:25:53 06/02/10 (0)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 12:22:48 05/28/10 (4)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:59:39 05/28/10 (3)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 14:46:48 05/28/10 (2)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 15:00:30 05/28/10 (1)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 15:30:27 05/28/10 (0)
- hey, thanks for connecting me to nice site! thanks!!! NT - Elizabeth 18:20:46 05/26/10 (0)
Follow Ups
- What is their take? - E-Stat 08:24:50 06/09/10 (5)
- Ok then why the applaud for the original comment? - Don Till 08:47:10 06/09/10 (4)
- Evidently - E-Stat 09:03:57 06/09/10 (3)
- You need to tie these spectra to resolution* independent of noise in order for your comment to be relative - Don Till 12:34:24 06/09/10 (2)
- Yes, kids it's another episode of... - E-Stat 13:37:08 06/09/10 (1)
- You didn't bother making an excuse, I apologize I thought you might try to avoid this kind of name calling... - Don Till 21:19:09 06/11/10 (0)