In Reply to: nice response posted by Don Till on June 5, 2010 at 09:55:03:
I agree with you.
It's a tough problem. If the equipment is low resolution it won't be sensitive. If the equipment is high resolution but designed with robust rejection of spurious signals then it won't be sensitive. To "maximize" sensitivity requires a combination of high resolution and low rejection.
In the real world of engineering, rejection of spurious signals is one design dimension and resolution is a different design dimension. There are always tradeoffs between design dimensions in any engineering project, even if cost is no object. Hence the "best" product for use in an environment free of EMI may be one with poor rejection but excellent resolution while the "best" product for use in an environment with lots of EMI may be one with lots of rejection but only moderate resolution. (Assuming no product can be found that is at once high resolution and high rejection.)
Of course it is conventional for those with expensive equipment to claim that differences they hear are due to "resolution" and not "lack of rejection". The reason for this has little to do with audio and a lot to do with human nature.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 11:49:47 06/05/10 (64)
- RE: nice response - Pat D 15:54:39 06/05/10 (36)
- RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 18:45:35 06/05/10 (35)
- How rich can it get? - Don Till 07:49:11 06/06/10 (34)
- "As if one might not find a woman beautiful because of her intelligence." - robert young 10:11:20 06/06/10 (33)
- It's exactly on topic and to the point of contention - Don Till 10:43:34 06/06/10 (32)
- It may be "on topic" but it demonstrates.... - robert young 14:14:13 06/06/10 (31)
- Maybe you can just move on.... - Don Till 12:39:45 06/08/10 (30)
- Are you really this clueless, or do you just play so on propheads? - robert young 13:03:48 06/08/10 (29)
- Read this - I haven't decided if you really this dense or trying to get some payback for being made of fool on - Don Till 13:14:05 06/08/10 (28)
- Your subject line isn't even coherent english... - robert young 06:54:38 06/09/10 (4)
- This is my last effort to help you - if you still don't "get it" just move on. - Don Till 08:35:50 06/09/10 (3)
- Another Don T epic fail.... - robert young 10:21:29 06/09/10 (2)
- I get it. You made up a topic and have been fooling me into thinking you were trying to join in on this one! - Don Till 12:40:59 06/09/10 (1)
- No need for me to continue to point out your ignorance. - robert young 13:23:49 06/09/10 (0)
- Funny... - Tony Lauck 13:59:02 06/08/10 (22)
- Unfortunately.... - Don Till 21:01:44 06/08/10 (20)
- clueless - Tony Lauck 07:11:23 06/09/10 (19)
- So? - Don Till 08:12:27 06/09/10 (18)
- RE: So? - Tony Lauck 08:42:47 06/09/10 (17)
- Not really Tony... - Don Till 08:49:29 06/09/10 (16)
- Hysterical!! - robert young 10:25:58 06/09/10 (0)
- I already agreed with you.... - Tony Lauck 09:03:52 06/09/10 (14)
- I know you said that you agree with me but I don't agree with you. - Don Till 12:57:23 06/09/10 (13)
- Clearly we disagree about agreement. - Tony Lauck 13:56:52 06/09/10 (12)
- Like that TT that picks up voices spoken in the listening room your amp is broken.... - Don Till 08:49:24 06/17/10 (7)
- It seems you simply can't comprehend what you read. - robert young 12:02:00 06/17/10 (6)
- Logical Boostrap Problem - Tony Lauck 12:52:10 06/17/10 (5)
- No it's a programming error - Don Till 19:23:11 06/17/10 (3)
- That analogy is so tortured.... - robert young 13:26:26 06/18/10 (2)
- THE MOMMY RETURNS! - Don Till 10:10:33 06/20/10 (1)
- Weak, but not unexpected. - robert young 19:49:59 06/20/10 (0)
- Do you remember the great Python skit... - robert young 13:31:26 06/17/10 (0)
- Sure..... - Don Till 21:12:55 06/11/10 (3)
- RE: Sure..... - Tony Lauck 06:05:40 06/12/10 (2)
- No Tony - Don Till 16:51:53 06/16/10 (1)
- Must be some big conspiracy of stoopud that keeps everyone from falling into line with your "reasoning." - robert young 18:20:28 06/16/10 (0)
- Good point - E-Stat 14:24:00 06/08/10 (0)
- Well said! - E-Stat 12:09:48 06/05/10 (26)
- Maybe you can clarify what's so well about it? - Don Till 13:44:43 06/05/10 (25)
- My suggestion to you - E-Stat 14:54:52 06/05/10 (24)
- Come now E-Stat - Don Till 17:04:19 06/05/10 (21)
- At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - E-Stat 19:39:40 06/05/10 (20)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - Don Till 07:29:42 06/06/10 (19)
- The *someone* - E-Stat 08:55:55 06/06/10 (18)
- Technical dimension? - Don Till 13:22:09 06/08/10 (10)
- Do you need assistance understanding the term "recording engineer"? -nt - E-Stat 13:40:20 06/08/10 (9)
- He's still pimping his stuff - duh! - Don Till 21:08:52 06/08/10 (8)
- Regardless of your insults - E-Stat 05:57:56 06/09/10 (7)
- Well then what's their take? - Don Till 08:10:34 06/09/10 (6)
- What is their take? - E-Stat 08:24:50 06/09/10 (5)
- Ok then why the applaud for the original comment? - Don Till 08:47:10 06/09/10 (4)
- Evidently - E-Stat 09:03:57 06/09/10 (3)
- You need to tie these spectra to resolution* independent of noise in order for your comment to be relative - Don Till 12:34:24 06/09/10 (2)
- Yes, kids it's another episode of... - E-Stat 13:37:08 06/09/10 (1)
- You didn't bother making an excuse, I apologize I thought you might try to avoid this kind of name calling... - Don Till 21:19:09 06/11/10 (0)
- That's laughable! - Don Till 10:07:05 06/06/10 (6)
- Reading retention=zero - E-Stat 10:46:38 06/06/10 (5)
- Giving you the benefit of the doubt you must have forgotten what we were talking about! - Don Till 11:32:01 06/06/10 (4)
- Not at all - E-Stat 12:59:29 06/06/10 (3)
- You've answered nothing - Don Till 12:44:53 06/08/10 (2)
- When all else fails, deny everything! :) -nt - E-Stat 12:45:53 06/08/10 (1)
- I'm not denying anything - you're the one posting smoke! - Don Till 13:02:29 06/08/10 (0)
- RE: My suggestion to you - Pat D 16:01:10 06/05/10 (1)
- May you enjoy you lack of awareness -nt - E-Stat 19:38:10 06/05/10 (0)