In Reply to: RE: will the objectionists finally allow that there is true evidence of cable differences posted by KlausR. on May 26, 2010 at 23:12:54:
"I'm not aware of any bias-controlled ( http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=14393) listening test that shows that different cables indeed do sound different. Newell and Holland don't indicate any such evidence either."Just because you (and Newell and Holland, et al) are not aware of such tests is no evidence that such tests don't exist. That's the oldest Strawman Argument in the world!
"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist. "
Furthermore, it should mentioned that even IF you were aware of such tests, chances are good you (and Newell and Holland, et al) would dispute the methods of the tests. Am I right? Or am I right?
Small wonder the objectivists are 25 years behind the times.
LOL
Edits: 05/27/10
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 05:17:05 05/27/10 (46)
- RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - KlausR. 06:32:33 05/27/10 (8)
- RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - geoffkait 06:58:12 05/27/10 (7)
- And, as usual, your USEFUL contribution so far is zero. - clifff 09:12:13 05/27/10 (0)
- Re: Sorry, Charlie - KlausR. 08:26:37 05/27/10 (5)
- Ouch! Low blow - geoffkait 14:37:11 05/27/10 (4)
- "LOL!" My kids do that. All the time. - clifff 16:22:54 05/27/10 (3)
- So do I. Around here, anyway. (nt) - kerr 06:48:58 05/28/10 (1)
- LOL! (nt) - geoffkait 09:46:24 05/28/10 (0)
- That's nice, Clifffy. Do they write in really short sentences like their Daddy? nt - geoffkait 16:35:10 05/27/10 (0)
- RE: "I'm not aware" - jneutron 05:45:51 05/27/10 (36)
- RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 06:08:24 05/27/10 (35)
- Barko lounger?? Que? - jneutron 09:27:29 05/27/10 (34)
- Barcalounger, the choice of audio skeptics everywhere - geoffkait 09:43:36 05/27/10 (33)
- Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:13:42 05/27/10 (32)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 11:30:27 05/27/10 (31)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:46:05 05/27/10 (30)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 14:35:27 05/27/10 (29)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 05:38:50 05/28/10 (14)
- That reminds me... - E-Stat 12:51:58 06/02/10 (6)
- would you believe... - jneutron 05:56:59 06/03/10 (5)
- I think you would definitely get push back - E-Stat 14:27:11 06/04/10 (4)
- I would not recommend video cable for AC. - jneutron 06:09:13 06/07/10 (0)
- RE: I think you would definitely get push back - Tony Lauck 11:53:13 06/05/10 (2)
- Does video triaxial - E-Stat 16:45:24 06/06/10 (1)
- RE: Does video triaxial - Tony Lauck 17:52:56 06/06/10 (0)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 08:02:26 05/28/10 (0)
- RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - Tony Lauck 07:46:53 05/28/10 (0)
- Good points. - rick_m 07:35:59 05/28/10 (4)
- RE: Good points. - Ugly 22:15:31 05/31/10 (3)
- RE: Good points. - rick_m 07:08:58 06/01/10 (2)
- RE: Good points. - Ugly 12:56:39 06/01/10 (1)
- RE: Good points. - rick_m 10:47:00 06/02/10 (0)
- Nothing wrong with being a skeptic, where it's appropriate. - Tony Lauck 16:58:39 05/27/10 (13)
- I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 03:15:22 05/28/10 (12)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - kerr 06:46:09 05/28/10 (0)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 06:17:26 05/28/10 (10)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 08:26:23 05/28/10 (9)
- RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 10:39:44 05/28/10 (8)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 11:59:54 05/28/10 (7)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:13:35 05/28/10 (6)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - morricab 09:25:53 06/02/10 (0)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 12:22:48 05/28/10 (4)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:59:39 05/28/10 (3)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 14:46:48 05/28/10 (2)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 15:00:30 05/28/10 (1)
- RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 15:30:27 05/28/10 (0)