65.19.76.104
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: ASRC not necessarily bad. posted by Todd Krieger on November 02, 2009 at 21:43:50
I'm sorry that my explanation was difficult to understand. It's a difficult subject, and no doubt the inherent difficulty has resulted in many designs that don't quite work correctly. For a description of some of the compromises applied in practical designs (which have been reported by audiophiles to be good sounding) look at the white paper for the ESS SABRE chip and the patent filing on ASRC technology by the authors of the paper.
There is no point in arguing the case against using analog PLLs to derive sample clocks. This has been discussed numerous times in numerous threads. If you have one that has low enough jitter that it doesn't bother you, then I'd just enjoy it.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: