68.3.132.52
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: So... any idea why both of Wavelength and Ayre sound better,... posted by carcass93 on October 28, 2009 at 08:30:33
The Benchmark uses asynchronous sample-rate conversion, the Ayre does not........ I don't think the Wavelength does either. That IMO would likely be the main "technical" reason why the Ayre and Wavelength would sound better. The Ayre also uses minimum phase filtering, which IMO widens the advantage.
Sometimes how a product works from a qualitative perspective is just as important, if not more-important, than mere measurements alone.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: