Propeller Head Plaza

What is missing in measurements, so there's lack of correlation between them and sound quality?

129.33.19.254


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  Email  Next ] [ Propeller Head Plaza ]

I know it was discussed, if not beaten to death, before, but this post is prompted by recent exchange on PC Audio forum about Benchmark vs. Wavelength DACs, used with computer via USB. What measurements are there, show superiority of Benchmark in every category (which prompts "objectivists" to talk about "engineered colorations" and "deliberate colorations as design goal"). However, posters who actually listened to both, have no doubt which one sounds better - and that ain't Benchmark. Almost the same goes for Benchmark vs. Ayre QB-9 - comparable measurements, superiority of Ayre in sound quality.

Links to measurements:

http://www.stereophile.com/digitalprocessors/108bench/index4.html

http://stereophile.com/digitalprocessors/wavelength_cosecant_v3_usb_digitalanalog_converter/index5.html

From my own experience, Benchmark (silver-faced, so one of the latest generations, if not the latest) via AES/EBU was somewhat harsh in highs and forward sounding, easily outclassed by several solid-state DACs I tried in the same and higher price range - so preference for "tube" sound (Wavelength) is not the reason.


So, what gives?


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  Email  Next ] [ Propeller Head Plaza ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]