24.13.232.33
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: I think you missed his point posted by E-Stat on October 21, 2009 at 10:20:50
"That is what he is talking about."
My intention was to clarify why most recordings are NOT the best way to judge faithfulness of reproduction, why they do not represent the "event", starting with a worst case, with an easy to envision example.
Conversely, explaining how your ears work and how essentially anyone can make a recording which is useful making that judgment.
Do try a couple of the recordings i mentioned, see if they don't sound more 'lifelike" than normal.
Actually i do deal with reinforced sound with realism as the goal.
Here is a sample;
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: