Propeller Head Plaza

RE: I suspect that they are . . .

71.231.229.130

In Reply to: RE: I suspect that they are . . . posted by caspian@peak.org on October 16, 2009 at 19:31:52

I would expect that for real "proof" objective analysis of the data disregards any potential biases such as appeal to authority even if it does seem very convincing. When you start talking about experimental data sizes I expect that the chances of luck potentially off-coloring the results gets bigger. What is required for proof?

Follow Ups:

95% confidence level. nt - Analog Scott 11:45:44 10/17/09 (4)
- 95% confidence is required for proof, or a single trial with 10 sets of ears gives 95% confidence? - Ugly 00:11:45 10/18/09 (3)
  - who said anything about single trials? - Analog Scott 09:11:52 10/18/09 (2)
    - I don't know. me? - Ugly 12:52:06 10/18/09 (1)
      - OK - Analog Scott 19:21:39 10/18/09 (0)
Valid question - caspian@peak.org 07:43:00 10/17/09 (1)
- RE: Valid question - Ugly 00:36:12 10/18/09 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.