71.231.229.130
In Reply to: RE: Demands? posted by thetubeguy1954 on May 27, 2009 at 07:02:06
Howdy Tubeguy,
It's an interesting challenge you've posed and I for one would like to see it happen with trustworthy representatives of all camps present in hopes of finally ending this mini drama. Somebody is bound to learn something and it would be cool if perhaps you and your mortal internet nemeses hung out a while and threw back some brews didn't realize the other guy isn't so bad afterall.
and this:
"other objectivists are biased against hearing any differences."
Yikes! That statement is like taking a bath in boiling snow....does not compute. Surely an experimenter allowing his biases to affect data collection is not worthy of the term "objectivist"? Couldn't you come up with one of your cute terms of endearment for non objective experimenters attempting to preach nonscientifically validated fairy tales as scientific law/fact something other than "objectivists"? You know, like: LFO's LFS's, that kind of thing. Some of my hero's I like to think of as "objectivist" and this is dirtying the term in my eyes.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Go Green ]
[ Take5 ]