Propeller Head Plaza

More name calling Tom. DBT is the scientific method for determining the audiblilty of small differences.

99.251.236.4

In Reply to: RE: Yet Another LFO With Blind Faith In Voodoo-Science Audio DBTs. posted by thetubeguy1954 on February 04, 2009 at 12:49:41

"From a strictly scientific viewpoint, DBT has proved to be the only method that is generally accepted for determining the audibility of small differences between audio equipment and cables. It does work."

----AA FAQ

"Probability is the very guide to life."---Cicero

http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/dbt.html (Open in New Window)

Follow Ups:

It "does" work? - Analog Scott 19:30:53 02/07/09 (6)
- RE: It "does" work? - Tony Lauck 07:09:43 02/08/09 (5)
  - You are right on all points - Analog Scott 07:58:15 02/08/09 (4)
    - Ping: Tony Lauck & Analog Scott - thetubeguy1954 09:48:41 02/08/09 (3)
      - RE: Ping: Tony Lauck & Analog Scott - Tony Lauck 13:22:48 02/08/09 (0)
      - RE: Ping: Tony Lauck & Analog Scott - Analog Scott 10:56:02 02/08/09 (1)
        
        Thanks Tony Lauck & Analog Scott - thetubeguy1954 11:03:12 02/09/09 (0)
Another Unsubstantiated LFO Opinion Stated As A Fact - thetubeguy1954 17:13:57 02/04/09 (73)
- RE: Another Unsubstantiated LFO Opinion Stated As A Fact - Kristian 15:31:28 02/05/09 (43)
  - Absolutely absurd assertion - Analog Scott 19:33:46 02/07/09 (4)
    - That's some pretty - Kristian 21:39:36 02/07/09 (3)
      - RE: That's some pretty - Analog Scott 22:19:35 02/07/09 (2)
        
        Our "mature, thinking audiophile" friend is apparently too lazy to type "Over The Top", hence OTT. - carcass93 18:59:43 02/08/09 (0)
        
        Kris, Kris, Kris... - thetubeguy1954 04:58:40 02/08/09 (0)
  - Kristian, Like Pat D You're Using An Ad Hominem Based Arguments - thetubeguy1954 06:21:08 02/06/09 (35)
    - As expected, you're getting yourt terms all messed up; - Kristian 11:54:28 02/06/09 (32)
      - RE: As expected, you're getting yourt terms all messed up; - thetubeguy1954 12:44:06 02/06/09 (31)
        
        Someone says one thing, you change it. - Pat D 21:27:38 02/08/09 (0)
        
        That Sure Shut Kristain Up, Huh? (nt) - thetubeguy1954 04:49:33 02/08/09 (0)
        
        Uhhh Tom . . . - Pat D 18:02:53 02/06/09 (28)
        
        Uhhh Pat Still NO PROOF &. . . - thetubeguy1954 05:19:19 02/07/09 (27)
        
        Context, context. - Pat D 06:18:30 02/07/09 (26)
        
        Ok Pat Try Again To Understand. - thetubeguy1954 11:44:25 02/07/09 (25)
        
        I gave you references to peer reviewed articles below, but you ignore them. - Pat D 16:51:25 02/07/09 (24)
        
        adding uncertainty = more certainty - mls-stl 08:40:03 02/08/09 (1)
        
        RE: adding uncertainty = more certainty - Pat D 09:52:16 02/08/09 (0)
        
        RE: I gave you references to peer reviewed articles below, but you ignore them. - thetubeguy1954 05:20:52 02/08/09 (21)
        
        I gave you what you asked for, but you still whine. - Pat D 09:46:54 02/08/09 (20)
        
        Dishonest To The End Pat - thetubeguy1954 10:03:00 02/08/09 (19)
        
        So now Tom denies scientific journals are scientific journals!! - Pat D 15:31:36 02/08/09 (18)
        
        I Don't Know That What You're Refering To Is Considered a Scientific Journal Pat! - thetubeguy1954 17:34:20 02/08/09 (17)
        
        RE: I Don't Know That What You're Refering To Is Considered a Scientific Journal Pat! - Pat D 21:44:01 02/08/09 (16)
        
        lets try to stick with the facts please - Analog Scott 22:25:10 02/08/09 (15)
        
        RE: lets try to stick with the facts please - Pat D 08:47:00 02/09/09 (14)
        
        RE: lets try to stick with the facts please - Analog Scott 18:58:32 02/09/09 (9)
        
        Why are you so interested in what I do at home? - Pat D 19:18:35 02/10/09 (8)
        
        Still No PROOF Dishonest Pat?. Chirp-Chirp-Chirp - thetubeguy1954 05:52:15 02/11/09 (0)
        
        Why should I answer any of your questions.... - Analog Scott 19:46:57 02/10/09 (6)
        
        So you don't like being asked the kind of questions you ask me! - Pat D 06:30:22 02/11/09 (5)
        
        You fail to understand my response. - Analog Scott 18:41:29 02/11/09 (4)
        
        You simply show you don't understand the issues. - Pat D 20:27:27 02/11/09 (3)
        
        Still can't bring yourself to answer those question can you? - Analog Scott 06:29:48 02/12/09 (2)
        
        Actually, I have. You just don't like the answers. - Pat D 07:06:55 02/13/09 (1)
        
        No Pat, actually you haven't. Reality bites don't it? - Analog Scott 18:40:13 02/13/09 (0)
        
        RE: lets try to stick with the facts please - thetubeguy1954 11:03:57 02/09/09 (3)
        
        I never promised you a rose garden. - Pat D 19:52:24 02/11/09 (2)
        
        "Analog Scott is perfectly capable of looking up any journal articles he pleases." - Analog Scott 06:41:47 02/12/09 (1)
        
        RE: "Analog Scott is perfectly capable of looking up any journal articles he pleases." - Pat D 14:32:40 02/13/09 (0)
    - My view on DBTs. What does it make me?? - Tony Lauck 08:26:13 02/06/09 (1)
      - RE: My view on DBTs. What does it make me?? - thetubeguy1954 12:11:56 02/06/09 (0)
  - "mature, thinking audiophiles" - you don't mean yourself, do you? - carcass93 19:46:02 02/05/09 (1)
    - RE: "mature, thinking audiophiles" - you don't mean yourself, do you? - Kristian 21:55:09 02/05/09 (0)
- You just confirmed once more that you don't accept scientific methodology - Pat D 22:25:44 02/04/09 (28)
  - Still NO PROOF Pat? Only Your Unsubstantiated "Faith-Based" Subjective Opinions on DBTs? - thetubeguy1954 05:23:27 02/05/09 (27)
    - What's faith based about differing results from sighted and controlled blind auditions? - Pat D 11:23:08 02/05/09 (26)
      - Still NO PROOF Pat? Now Using You're Avoidence Technics? - thetubeguy1954 12:31:07 02/05/09 (25)
        
        Answer: faith is not involved in getting different results in sighted and blind auditions. - Pat D 12:45:56 02/05/09 (24)
        
        Still No PROOF Pat? - thetubeguy1954 06:47:15 02/06/09 (23)
        
        Well, controlled DBT is the scientific method for determining small audible differences. - Pat D 09:37:47 02/06/09 (22)
        
        Still No PROOF Pat That's Peer-Reviewed & Published Like I Asked For - thetubeguy1954 12:10:02 02/06/09 (16)
        
        Tom wants "proof" that an article in JAES is peer reviewed!!! - Pat D 18:00:06 02/06/09 (15)
        
        Boy, *that* shut him up, good! nt. - Kristian 11:59:52 02/07/09 (4)
        
        No, nothing shuts Tom up! - Pat D 16:04:04 02/08/09 (2)
        
        Or You Pat D aka Mr Dishonest - thetubeguy1954 11:05:23 02/09/09 (1)
        
        You're a self-fulfilling prophecy, Tom. (nt) - Pat D 09:47:24 02/10/09 (0)
        
        Did It Kristain? Maybe You Should Read Other Parts Of This Thread! - thetubeguy1954 04:23:50 02/08/09 (0)
        
        What physical limits? - Tony Lauck 21:36:49 02/06/09 (7)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Pat D 06:27:57 02/07/09 (6)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Tony Lauck 06:52:38 02/07/09 (5)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Pat D 10:48:06 02/07/09 (4)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Tony Lauck 13:12:13 02/07/09 (3)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Pat D 16:02:44 02/08/09 (2)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Tony Lauck 18:40:47 02/08/09 (1)
        
        RE: What physical limits? - Pat D 20:40:12 02/08/09 (0)
        
        RE: Tom wants "proof" that an article in JAES is peer reviewed!!! - Tony Lauck 20:11:00 02/06/09 (1)
        
        RE: Tom wants "proof" that an article in JAES is peer reviewed!!! - Pat D 20:34:45 02/06/09 (0)
        
        " DBT is the recognized scientific methodology..." - clearly, you firmly believe that... - carcass93 11:56:07 02/06/09 (0)
        
        Problems with Authorities - Tony Lauck 10:36:12 02/06/09 (3)
        
        RE: Problems with Authorities - Pat D 11:56:13 02/06/09 (2)
        
        RE: Problems with Authorities - Tony Lauck 12:42:54 02/06/09 (1)
        
        I suspect that degree of deference to authorities is directly proportional to lack of experience. - bjh 14:23:58 02/06/09 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.