Propeller Head Plaza

Nice Link......... I Bookmarked It.........

75.214.172.33

In Reply to: RE: Just found this list which made me think of many discussions I've seen here posted by bwaslo on May 17, 2008 at 08:44:56

I've seen a lot of these tactics applied on AA, but didn't actually know the official names for them.

Item 3, in my opinion, is the most-common and most-divisive tactic, mainly because the objective is to disqualify opposing findings and opinions. In a healthy discussion, the material is discussed at face value, not which person's opinions are best-qualified.

Follow Ups:

Number 5 is also used frequently - E-Stat 07:51:33 05/18/08 (79)
- RE: Read more closely - theaudiohobby 13:11:05 05/18/08 (72)
  - I must have missed that one. - robert young 15:11:23 05/19/08 (32)
    - RE: Yes, you did - theaudiohobby 11:04:47 05/20/08 (26)
      - Thanks for the clarification. I did miss that one.... - robert young 11:23:12 05/20/08 (25)
        
        RE: Thanks for the clarification. I did miss that one.... - theaudiohobby 11:39:29 05/20/08 (20)
        
        More thread irony.... - robert young 11:57:41 05/20/08 (19)
        
        RE: This is gettng ridiculous - theaudiohobby 12:14:21 05/20/08 (18)
        
        Hey! Nice technique!!! - robert young 12:19:56 05/20/08 (17)
        
        At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - E-Stat 12:33:18 05/20/08 (0)
        
        RE: Get a grip! - theaudiohobby 12:24:13 05/20/08 (15)
        
        Like I said: nice technique. - robert young 12:28:08 05/20/08 (14)
        
        RE: What are you trying to imply? - theaudiohobby 12:29:03 05/20/08 (13)
        
        I'm not sure, Hobby. - robert young 12:40:36 05/20/08 (12)
        
        Heh, heh - kerr 13:07:46 05/20/08 (11)
        
        That's udderly ridiculous - robert young 13:36:44 05/20/08 (7)
        
        Who's next? - E-Stat 20:09:01 05/20/08 (5)
        
        You know what *isn't* funny? - kerr 20:20:39 05/20/08 (4)
        
        You know what *isn't* funny? - rick_m 09:26:10 05/21/08 (1)
        
        RE: You know what *isn't* funny? - kerr 10:21:43 05/21/08 (0)
        
        Why things sound different - Tony Lauck 06:56:55 05/21/08 (0)
        
        It is most ironic - E-Stat 20:47:06 05/20/08 (0)
        
        RE: That's udderly ridiculous - kerr 13:39:18 05/20/08 (0)
        
        Actually - E-Stat 13:20:37 05/20/08 (2)
        
        RE: Actually - kerr 13:40:22 05/20/08 (1)
        
        You know - E-Stat 20:23:39 05/20/08 (0)
        
        The irony of course - E-Stat 11:32:00 05/20/08 (3)
        
        RE: The irony of course - theaudiohobby 11:56:48 05/20/08 (2)
        
        Indeed - E-Stat 12:15:54 05/20/08 (1)
        
        RE: Keep deluding yourself - theaudiohobby 12:22:20 05/20/08 (0)
    - He has not stopped posting - E-Stat 09:29:19 05/20/08 (4)
      - haven't been to vintage for a while... - robert young 10:18:25 05/20/08 (3)
        
        Much of - E-Stat 11:17:42 05/20/08 (2)
        
        Actually, I did read the entire thread.... - robert young 11:31:09 05/20/08 (1)
        
        Here's one of Jerry's posts - E-Stat 11:46:31 05/20/08 (0)
  - I've discovered over the years that you are indeed an unusual poster - E-Stat 19:05:28 05/18/08 (33)
    - RE: You on the other hand, are you typical audiophile poster - theaudiohobby 02:06:04 05/19/08 (32)
      - RE: You on the other hand, are you typical audiophile poster - tomsyl1 17:12:55 05/19/08 (10)
        
        Believe it or Not - Dan Banquer 06:42:46 05/22/08 (8)
        
        RE: Believe it or Not - kerr 17:34:07 05/22/08 (5)
        
        RE: Believe it or Not - Dan Banquer 07:36:26 05/23/08 (4)
        
        About earth grounds - tomsyl1 19:15:10 05/24/08 (2)
        
        Main service panel vs. subpanel requirements? - andy_c 02:21:47 05/25/08 (1)
        
        RE: Main service panel vs. subpanel requirements? - Dan Banquer 04:38:19 05/26/08 (0)
        
        Thanks, Dan - kerr 09:37:45 05/23/08 (0)
        
        RE: Believe it or Not - rick_m 09:27:47 05/22/08 (1)
        
        RE: Believe it or Not - Dan Banquer 09:43:17 05/22/08 (0)
        
        That or the original was grossly underated for the equipments current reqs. - Ugly 21:10:46 05/19/08 (0)
      - Let's do start with Bold Eagle's comments - E-Stat 06:19:04 05/19/08 (19)
        
        RE: Let's do start with Bold Eagle's comments - theaudiohobby 08:01:32 05/19/08 (18)
        
        Are you incapable of following a stream of thought? - E-Stat 08:29:02 05/19/08 (17)
        
        RE: When will you quit playing dumb? - theaudiohobby 09:01:04 05/19/08 (16)
        
        I am doing my best to understand your bizarre behavior - E-Stat 09:14:13 05/19/08 (15)
        
        Good luck. nt - Analog Scott 19:46:09 05/19/08 (0)
        
        RE: Same here - theaudiohobby 10:06:22 05/19/08 (13)
        
        Clarify? - E-Stat 10:32:09 05/19/08 (12)
        
        RE: Yet another weasel, a twist on the playing dumb tactic - theaudiohobby 10:50:48 05/19/08 (3)
        
        Simple yes or no answer would suffice - E-Stat 10:52:50 05/19/08 (2)
        
        RE: drop the weasel and answer my questions. -nt - theaudiohobby 10:56:01 05/19/08 (1)
        
        You first - E-Stat 11:03:24 05/19/08 (0)
        
        Deep breaths, E-Stat! LOL! (nt) - kerr 10:33:44 05/19/08 (7)
        
        Like I've said before - E-Stat 10:47:40 05/19/08 (6)
        
        RE: Talk about a weasel. - theaudiohobby 11:24:28 05/19/08 (3)
        
        Simple reason, my friend - E-Stat 11:29:08 05/19/08 (2)
        
        RE: Yep, I continue to read - theaudiohobby 14:05:08 05/19/08 (1)
        
        RU still confused? - E-Stat 14:33:38 05/19/08 (0)
        
        G'luck with that, mate. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:12:59 05/19/08 (1)
        
        One might reasonably assume - E-Stat 11:24:12 05/19/08 (0)
      - Dude get a clue - Analog Scott 04:07:23 05/19/08 (0)
  - "those that dismiss a lot of cable voodoo do it on sound scientific basis" - Analog Scott 14:24:54 05/18/08 (4)
    - OK, here's a "cable voodoo" thought experiment - tomsyl1 16:25:59 05/21/08 (1)
      - RE: OK, here's a "cable voodoo" thought experiment - rick_m 21:59:45 05/22/08 (0)
    - Here's one.... - Ugly 07:35:45 05/19/08 (1)
      - I actually opened your post thinking you actually had something - Analog Scott 19:43:58 05/19/08 (0)
- An awful lot of #2 around here! - kerr 09:38:04 05/18/08 (2)
  - Wow! Logical fallacies in a logical fallacy thread! - jpvs 09:42:49 05/18/08 (1)
    - RE: Wow! Logical fallacies in a logical fallacy thread! - kerr 12:22:36 05/18/08 (0)
- RE: Number 5 is also used frequently - bwaslo 07:59:49 05/18/08 (2)
  - We should rename prop heads to "Number 17 Forum" - Lynn 09:33:48 05/18/08 (0)
  - Number 17! - andy_c 08:27:46 05/18/08 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.