In Reply to: "...in plain olde English. " posted by robert young on December 17, 2007 at 17:24:16:
...over this formulation of a grad student the way John Atkinson now agrees to put it, closely following the conclusions by the test author Lipshitz himself:"If it [reversal of absolute polarity] is audible with typical music, the effect is subtle...and this test does not provide evidence that the effect is audible with a statistical degree of confidence greater than [x]%." (My emphasis.)
If I may fill in that x for JA in his last sentence, the chances that a 60/113 result is obtained by just guessing are greater than 50% (about 58%), meaning that the score has no significance at all. His own point proven: not shown to be audible.
In other words, if audible at all, the effect is so subtle it cannot even be heard (in the tests conducted so far, in case JA disagrees with this formulation...).
TL
Edits: 12/18/07
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I rather prefer... - tlyyra 03:12:34 12/18/07 (36)
- RE: I rather prefer... - morricab 04:27:23 12/18/07 (35)
- According to which thesis? - tlyyra 04:41:14 12/18/07 (34)
- It's from your own link!!! - robert young 04:52:27 12/18/07 (33)
- "You can't have your cake and eat it too. " No? - bjh 07:04:37 12/18/07 (0)
- What are you talking about? - tlyyra 06:22:38 12/18/07 (31)
- RE: What are you talking about? - morricab 08:33:44 12/18/07 (30)
- Fine. - tlyyra 13:02:15 12/18/07 (29)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 02:29:24 12/19/07 (28)
- RE: Fine. - tlyyra 03:22:03 12/19/07 (27)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 09:03:55 12/19/07 (26)
- Debunking / Policing on AA / Correcting Errors - tlyyra 04:12:31 12/20/07 (9)
- Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - Ted Smith 11:41:29 12/20/07 (3)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - tlyyra 12:09:25 12/20/07 (2)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - Ted Smith 12:16:06 12/20/07 (1)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - tlyyra 14:03:19 12/20/07 (0)
- Correcting Errors - John Atkinson 04:29:46 12/20/07 (4)
- Correcting More Errors - tlyyra 05:39:35 12/20/07 (3)
- RE: Correcting More Errors - John Atkinson 06:41:51 12/20/07 (2)
- Why not just answer the questions? They would settle it all so very quickly. - tlyyra 08:17:37 12/20/07 (1)
- I'm only replying so you can't delete it. - robert young 10:14:03 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: Fine. - andy_c 20:47:09 12/19/07 (12)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 02:19:23 12/20/07 (11)
- Yes, you are missing something. - tlyyra 03:25:06 12/20/07 (10)
- RE: Yes, you are missing something. - morricab 03:15:50 12/21/07 (9)
- 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 04:06:27 12/21/07 (8)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 11:50:25 12/21/07 (6)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 11:30:02 12/22/07 (5)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 14:57:16 12/22/07 (4)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 05:37:18 12/23/07 (3)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 08:01:18 12/24/07 (2)
- "Semantic forests" and still no evidence you can cite? - tlyyra 08:59:06 12/26/07 (1)
- More mindreading, it appears - John Atkinson 13:51:11 12/27/07 (0)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - morricab 06:23:28 12/21/07 (0)
- Objection, Your Honor - bjh 09:37:39 12/19/07 (2)
- Right, you have no arguments... - tlyyra 03:27:33 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: Objection, Your Honor - morricab 02:16:49 12/20/07 (0)