In Reply to: Technical vs. psychoacoustic accuracy posted by Pat D on April 19, 2007 at 14:18:17:
I personally think sound reproduction most-faithful to the signal is a lot closer to the "psychoacoustic ideal" than a lot of "technical" people would like to believe..... I'm not talking about artificial "bloom", signal enhancements, or whatever. I'm talking "straight-wire-with-gain"....A system that sounds analytical IMO is *not* doing a good job in sound reproduction, even though some might consider this "accurate." When we get very close go faithful reproduction, the "technical" and "psychoacoustical" means approaches identical ends.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- My $0.02..... - Todd Krieger 12:20:31 04/20/07 (1)
- Re: My $0.02..... - Pat D 20:14:09 04/20/07 (0)