In Reply to: I didn't answer it because my answer is irrelevant. posted by Analog Scott on April 15, 2007 at 16:10:13:
His thread title is a general question about the meaning of 'well designed amplififer' but it turns out he really wants explicition of Peter Aczel's criteria for a well designed amplifier. And I have all ready pointed out that the proper person to ask would be Peter Aczel himself, as they are his opinions. Our answers to that would be irrelevant.
____________________________________________________
"Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, it now comes out that tubey wasn't at all clear about what he wanted. - Pat D 18:00:12 04/15/07 (8)
- Pat Once Afain You Just Cannot Understand The Obvious... - thetubeguy1954 11:26:17 04/16/07 (2)
- But no one seems to have grasped your intent in the original post! - Pat D 13:34:09 04/16/07 (1)
- Not True! Only The Objectivist Pretended Not To Understand.... - thetubeguy1954 14:11:43 04/16/07 (0)
- actually there might be a relevant answer from some one here - Analog Scott 20:45:52 04/15/07 (3)
- That's It Precisely - thetubeguy1954 11:36:29 04/16/07 (2)
- Making things up again. - Pat D 13:07:01 04/16/07 (1)
- Yes You Are (nt) - thetubeguy1954 14:13:03 04/16/07 (0)
- I don't think those "right answers" he wanted exist. (nt) - Presto 20:12:55 04/15/07 (0)