In Reply to: As Typical The Obvious Needs To Be Explained Tou You! posted by thetubeguy1954 on April 15, 2007 at 16:37:57:
Pardon me, but your own thread title reads: "What Constitues [sic] A "Properly Designed" Amp?"And several people have given you their own insightful takes on the matter.
Now, we find you ignore your own question and really want people here to explicitate what Peter Aczel meant! And, as I have pointed out, the proper person to ask about those specific criteria is Peter Aczel himself. We are not responsibile for his wording.
Besides, you also include some seemingly contrary to fact assumptions in your second set of questions about who decided it, as if there were some widely recognized authority for setting such criteria. Again, the person to ask is Peter Aczel, after cleaning up those questions to make better sense.
____________________________________________________
"Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If that's what you wanted, why didn't you say so? - Pat D 17:51:21 04/15/07 (7)
- Because It Was Obvious & Implied In The Question - thetubeguy1954 11:02:36 04/16/07 (0)
- why don't you just answer the question? - Analog Scott 22:06:06 04/15/07 (5)
- I did! I pointed out that if he wants Peter Aczel's ideas on "well designed" explained, he should ask Mr. Aczel! - Pat D 20:39:12 04/16/07 (4)
- No you didn't. - Analog Scott 20:45:25 04/16/07 (3)
- Of course I answered him. - Pat D 21:33:55 04/16/07 (2)
- It seems you just want to argue about silly things - Analog Scott 21:51:37 04/16/07 (1)
- Somehow I just don't look up every single post you make. - Pat D 05:45:44 04/17/07 (0)