In Reply to: RE: Objective Measurement Results for Cables posted by truthseekerprime on October 1, 2007 at 07:27:15:
> Unfortunately without controlled listening tests it's impossible to know
> which of the effects they demonstrate are audible, or even which are the
> most important.
Not at all if the measurements are sufficient. For example, if the authors labelled the y axis for the plots that curiously have the label "dB" but no numbers with, say, 1.0x10-6, 2.0x10-6,... would the effect of the different cables be above or below the threshold of audibility?
The point of science is to replace having to perform an experiment to find out something with scientific knowledge which can be used to predict the outcome of said experiment. Your statement implies this cannot be done for cables at audio frequencies and many people including myself would disagree for those cases where the size of the change is either well below or well above the expected threshold of audibility. When it is near the threshold then there may be a case for experimentation.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Objective Measurement Results for Cables - andy19191 08:37:56 10/01/07 (15)
- RE: Objective Measurement Results for Cables - Jon Risch 18:49:16 10/01/07 (5)
- RE: Objective Measurement Results for Cables - andy19191 01:58:00 10/02/07 (4)
- Answer really wanted... - Jon Risch 17:06:06 10/02/07 (2)
- RE: Answer really wanted... - andy19191 05:09:42 10/04/07 (1)
- Another imaginative Objectivist! - bjh 14:28:12 10/04/07 (0)
- What figure number (from the article) are you referring to? nt - bjh 05:36:24 10/02/07 (0)
- "Your statement implies this cannot be done for cables at audio frequencies..." - truthseekerprime 14:32:04 10/01/07 (1)
- RE: "Your statement implies this cannot be done for cables at audio frequencies..." - andy19191 14:57:54 10/01/07 (0)
- Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt - Norm 11:17:06 10/01/07 (6)
- RE: Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt - andy19191 11:31:28 10/01/07 (5)
- RE: Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt - morricab 09:15:11 10/02/07 (0)
- Is it not possible that other measures are needed especially if people hear a difference? nt - Norm 19:38:48 10/01/07 (3)
- RE: Is it not possible that other measures are needed especially if people hear a difference? nt - andy19191 23:58:24 10/01/07 (2)
- The key is "if people are imaging differences." What if they are not? - Norm 06:16:50 10/02/07 (1)
- RE: The key is "if people are imaging differences." What if they are not? - andy19191 07:27:50 10/02/07 (0)