Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

How do we do that? You can't even define the test procedure.

Your experiments are not scientifically repeatable because there is no test procedure. There are no controls. Not even dependent variables are defined. There are no working theories presented as to why domestic freezing does what it's proponents say it does as far as sonic improvements are concerned.

All of the loose references you have provided (they, them, so-and-so, this guy, my buddy, etc) seem to have done these tests with their own rendition of what would be a reasonable test procedure. Of course, we're assuming that because you are asking people to "do the experiment for themselves" but offer no test procedure, thus making any data you collect... absolutely useless. Of no value.

"Some guy" even was able to see "improved step response" by "looking at waveforms". Well, you can't look at waveforms, but you can look at graphical representations of them. What test equipment was used to measure these step response measurements? What was the test procedure? What is his definition of "improved step response" and how much did it improve? Who was SOME GUY? Can he present his findings here?

Ah - now you're saying that this phenomenon not only results in improved sonics, but MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENTS!!

Excellent. Post the test results and this debate will be over!

Cheers,
Presto


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • How do we do that? You can't even define the test procedure. - Presto 16:23:42 04/11/07 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.