Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Re: Just kidding about the 'science'...

> I you wish to comment without factual backing, who am I to do anything
> but counter your assessments if they are wrong? Most of them are
> wrong.

I commented based on the threads in JREF which would seem to be reasonably factual. If you want to point errors may I suggest simply quoting the statement which is wrong and stating why it is wrong underneath it in a self contained manner. A general claim without anything concrete is not persuasive.

> My issue is not with JREF any longer, although their actions still
> disgust me, it is with those blinded to their shenanigans. I'm not
> at war with 'you guys', I simply want the relevant facts to be known
> on the matter.

Well then the remedy would seem to be straightforward. Create a summary thread just like Kramers, inserting the bits you consider are missing and pointing out where in his summary thread things are not quite right. That is, you put in the work and not ask your readers to do it.

> I'm sure you would agree that there is a sickening element to
> deceit.

It depends on the case and your viewpoint. Is it sickening that the manufacturers of this chip are deceiving you about its action?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.