In Reply to: Old or not, it remains a perfect example posted by E-Stat on March 7, 2007 at 05:59:12:
I asked why"loss of resolution, imaging and dynamics wrought by ANY device is not meaasureable" {CORR]
not why THD and/or IM measurments might be useful or useless, which is irrelevant to the issue at hand. My question was "why is loss of resolution, imaging and dynamics wrought by ANY device is not meaasureable? Why not answer that one rather than discussing an irrelevant issue.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Irrelevant and a crock - theaudiohobby 06:27:38 03/07/07 (18)
- Because they DON'T WORK - E-Stat 06:44:25 03/07/07 (17)
- Dan, are you still puking out there? - E-Stat 07:14:37 03/07/07 (0)
- Re: Still a crock - theaudiohobby 07:01:16 03/07/07 (15)
- Re: Still a crock - morricab 07:14:11 03/07/07 (0)
- Explain then - E-Stat 07:09:36 03/07/07 (13)
- Re: A crock - theaudiohobby 08:30:17 03/07/07 (12)
- You keep running in circles - E-Stat 09:12:49 03/07/07 (11)
- Re: Another crock, another non-sequiter - theaudiohobby 09:32:18 03/07/07 (10)
- Ok - E-Stat 09:38:00 03/07/07 (9)
- Re: An impasse - theaudiohobby 09:42:39 03/07/07 (8)
- Gee.. - E-Stat 09:50:08 03/07/07 (7)
- Re: And the crock continues.... - theaudiohobby 10:09:47 03/07/07 (6)
- Forget? - E-Stat 10:21:14 03/07/07 (5)
- Re: Just another crock - theaudiohobby 14:51:15 03/07/07 (4)
- We're talking across each other - E-Stat 16:12:39 03/07/07 (3)
- Re: This is getting more ridiculous - theaudiohobby 02:23:11 03/08/07 (2)
- I remain talking about the audio quality - E-Stat 05:46:39 03/08/07 (1)
- Re: Just another crock - theaudiohobby 07:04:48 03/08/07 (0)