In Reply to: On a different note: Response to Morricab on Amplifiers posted by theaudiohobby on February 8, 2007 at 05:07:29:
I mean, serious people? I'm referring to this:>>"...as they preserver harmonic content, and hence the timbre(sound quality) of the music." <<
Again, does any real, serious person think that harmonic distortion equates with "preserv(ing) harmonic content"? It seems to me a remarkably simplistic--and transparently incorrect--claim, and I notice that it is not attributed to anyone. Is there any citation in the original?
To state the obvious, "preserving the harmonic content" means reproducing precisely what's on the recording--harmonic content and all.
Support for such the disputed claim would require showing NOT that SETs have a nice distortion signature, but that other types of amplication REDUCE harmonic content MORE than SETS do. But a low-distortion amplifier with reasonably wide bandwidth and accurate frequency response will reproduce the harmonics on the recording as well as it records the fundamentals--and will do so with greater accuracy than a higher-distortion amp.
What am I missing?
Jim Austin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Does anyone really think this? - Jim Austin 18:56:29 02/08/07 (10)
- "equates" is your own interpretation of the text. - Al Sekela 10:35:09 02/10/07 (1)
- Re: "equates" is your own interpretation of the text. - morricab 05:23:17 02/14/07 (0)
- Re: Does anyone really think this? - theaudiohobby 01:27:22 02/10/07 (0)
- Re: Does anyone really think this? - morricab 03:10:33 02/09/07 (6)
- Re: Does anyone really think this? - Jim Austin 07:26:53 02/09/07 (5)
- Re: Does anyone really think this? - bjh 08:02:43 02/09/07 (4)
- I don't think... - Jim Austin 08:21:33 02/09/07 (3)
- Re: I don't think... - bjh 09:01:11 02/09/07 (2)
- If you could only see... - Jim Austin 09:04:30 02/09/07 (1)
- Please! - bjh 09:30:20 02/09/07 (0)