I'll assume that's a rhetorical question. nt - Dan Banquer

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Comments on Kait - apesma 09:37:22 02/07/07 (126)

Oscar Wilde sued. - Al Sekela 14:20:00 02/08/07 (0)

Re: Comments on Kait - Todd Krieger 11:34:43 02/07/07 (100)

Re: Comments on Kait - Don T 15:25:21 02/07/07 (88)

Re: Comments on Kait - Todd Krieger 23:51:41 02/07/07 (87)

I don't think the audio industry is corrupt by any stretch of the imagination. - Don T 08:25:49 02/08/07 (85)

I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - Todd Krieger 11:25:49 02/08/07 (84)

Re: I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - Werner 04:42:34 02/15/07 (0)

Re: I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - Don T 10:05:52 02/09/07 (7)

Re: I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - john curl 01:42:12 02/10/07 (5)

"better sound" - Don T 07:47:18 02/12/07 (3)

Re: "better sound" - john curl 10:52:20 02/12/07 (2)

Nice analogy! - Don T 08:00:34 02/13/07 (0)

You should now be gaining an appreciation of Donny's problem. - bjh 18:56:48 02/12/07 (0)

Re: You missed the big picture in a big way..... - theaudiohobby 15:52:18 02/11/07 (0)

A Fair Assessment.... - Todd Krieger 10:36:45 02/09/07 (0)

Re: I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - morricab 03:24:08 02/09/07 (64)

You Made My Point!!!! - Todd Krieger 10:33:48 02/09/07 (63)

Re: You Made My Point!!!! - morricab 03:52:11 02/11/07 (54)

Re: There you go again... - geoffkait 07:19:06 02/11/07 (53)

Re: There you go again... - morricab 02:12:18 02/12/07 (52)

Re: This is the 21st century, Morriclam - try to be in it. nt - geoffkait 05:11:23 02/12/07 (51)

Re: This is the 21st century, Morriclam - try to be in it. nt - morricab 05:21:03 02/12/07 (50)

Re: Ah, that old Skeptics Handbook warhorse... - geoffkait 06:49:55 02/12/07 (49)

Re: Ah, that old Skeptics Handbook warhorse... - morricab 08:44:11 02/12/07 (48)

Re: "I know a lot how light interacts with matter - take that for what you will." - geoffkait 09:15:31 02/12/07 (47)

perhaps he was referring to... - BS64 16:09:33 02/24/07 (0)

Re: "I know a lot how light interacts with matter - take that for what you will." - morricab 12:50:15 02/12/07 (45)

Re: I give up - you're - geoffkait 13:14:52 02/12/07 (44)

Re: I give up - you're - morricab 04:18:55 02/13/07 (43)

Re: Technical discussion - geoffkait 05:14:24 02/13/07 (42)

Actually, Geoff... - robert young 11:42:24 02/13/07 (41)

Re: "Now, how about it?" - geoffkait 12:29:01 02/13/07 (40)

Thank you for doing a thorough search on my posts. - robert young 13:27:10 02/13/07 (39)

Re: You're pulling my leg, right? nt - geoffkait 15:11:19 02/13/07 (0)

And thanks for the 4 different versions of your post as well! - robert young 13:46:12 02/13/07 (37)

Re: No problem... - geoffkait 14:08:31 02/13/07 (36)

Troll?? That's coming from you?? - robert young 04:43:30 02/14/07 (35)

Re: Troll?? That's coming from you?? - morricab 05:14:33 02/14/07 (34)

Re: Speaking of trolls, Morriclam is one of my favs... - geoffkait 05:39:25 02/14/07 (33)

Re: Speaking of trolls, Morriclam is one of my favs... - morricab 08:42:05 02/14/07 (32)

Re: "Talk tecnical" - geoffkait 09:32:05 02/14/07 (31)

Re: "Talk tecnical" - morricab 12:56:06 02/14/07 (28)

Re: Morricab - caution, this might make you blush - geoffkait 10:23:07 02/15/07 (26)

Geoffrey, here's the complete last sentence from Wikepedia: - robert young 13:10:51 02/15/07 (25)

Re: Troll expert - geoffkait 13:36:32 02/15/07 (24)

It's not working, Geoff. - robert young 11:02:09 02/16/07 (23)

Re: No problem here - geoffkait 12:03:02 02/16/07 (22)

Thanks for the characterization! - robert young 17:14:42 02/16/07 (21)

Re: If the shoe fits - geoffkait 17:53:24 02/16/07 (20)

Your best yet!! Wow, Geoff, you really have a way with cliches! - robert young 11:21:30 02/17/07 (19)

Re: "turn the thread back towards the technical" - geoffkait 12:42:18 02/17/07 (18)

Re: "turn the thread back towards the technical" - morricab 13:14:34 02/18/07 (17)

Re: Moderators, please send Morricab to Whiners Woad - geoffkait 15:31:35 02/18/07 (16)

Re: Moderators, please send Morricab to Whiners Woad - morricab 07:40:51 02/20/07 (15)

Re: "Go read my discussions on amplifiers" - geoffkait 10:36:49 02/20/07 (14)

Re: "Go read my discussions on amplifiers" - morricab 16:09:52 02/20/07 (13)

Re: "The discussion of amps is timeless" - geoffkait 02:39:32 02/21/07 (0)

Re: "Go read my discussions on amplifiers" - morricab 02:37:25 02/21/07 (11)

Re: "Deleting your posts?" - geoffkait 04:21:25 02/21/07 (10)

One last question. - morricab 08:17:40 02/21/07 (7)

Re: "Do you have a science education... at all?" - geoffkait 09:41:09 02/21/07 (6)

Re: "Do you have a science education... at all?" - morricab 13:48:28 02/21/07 (5)

Re: "You obviously know so little about how real science is done"" - geoffkait 14:40:48 02/21/07 (4)

Re: "You obviously know so little about how real science is done"" - morricab 16:26:38 02/21/07 (3)

Re: "You obviously know so little about how real science is done"" - geoffkait 17:26:59 02/21/07 (2)

Re: "You obviously know so little about how real science is done"" - morricab 02:16:14 02/22/07 (1)

Re: "Zurich is the best city in the world" - geoffkait 06:06:55 02/22/07 (0)

Re: "Deleting your posts?" - morricab 08:08:14 02/21/07 (0)

Re: "Deleting your posts?" - morricab 08:06:43 02/21/07 (0)

Re: "He bothered to reply as well" - geoffkait 14:50:48 02/14/07 (0)

Indeed! - Don T 11:22:22 02/14/07 (1)

Re: "I didn't think it was funny" - geoffkait 11:47:21 02/14/07 (0)

Doesn't it all come down to this: No one knows exactly... - clarkjohnsen 11:56:02 02/09/07 (7)

Re: Doesn't it all come down to this: No one knows exactly... - TomLarson 20:00:55 02/10/07 (6)

"Someone knew enough about how digital works to invent the damn medium." Right! And someone too... - clarkjohnsen 12:30:04 02/11/07 (5)

Re: "Someone knew enough about how digital works to invent the damn medium." Right! And someone too... - TomLarson 19:30:16 02/13/07 (4)

"Utter dismissal of the original invention..." Not me, not for years anyway. - clarkjohnsen 09:22:19 02/14/07 (1)

Re: "Utter dismissal of the original invention..." Not me, not for years anyway. - TomLarson 10:43:09 02/14/07 (0)

Perhaps... - robert young 04:45:44 02/14/07 (1)

"Hijacked by commercial interests." No, those were the interests that made it happen. I have an article... - clarkjohnsen 09:09:24 02/14/07 (0)

Big difference between naive and corrupt...(nt) - mkuller 18:50:03 02/08/07 (0)

Re: Big difference between naive and corrupt...(nt) - Todd Krieger 01:29:26 02/09/07 (0)

Corrupt Beyond Recognition? - AJinFLA 12:58:37 02/08/07 (2)

You Forgot To Mention...... - Todd Krieger 10:40:05 02/09/07 (0)

Your disappointment is... what's the word that sends you twits up the wall, oh yeah... Palpable! - bjh 13:39:53 02/08/07 (0)

Re: I Think It's Corrupt Beyond Recognition..... - TomLarson 11:51:13 02/08/07 (4)

Don Allen of Phoenix..... - Todd Krieger 01:26:13 02/09/07 (0)

Re: Don Allen of Phoenix..... - TomLarson 12:04:58 02/10/07 (1)

You Got Mail...... - Todd Krieger 07:14:23 02/14/07 (0)

I love satisfaction too... - Wellfed 14:47:01 02/09/07 (0)

Not bad, not bad! - bjh 04:49:19 02/08/07 (0)

You, my good man, are incorrect on one point. - jneutron 12:05:15 02/07/07 (8)

Re: You, my good man, are incorrect on one point. - Todd Krieger 23:24:29 02/07/07 (1)

:-)nt - jneutron 07:07:13 02/08/07 (0)

That's a new record for Krieger -- give the man the credit he deserves! - Richard BassNut Greene 15:01:18 02/07/07 (3)

Saw Palmetto Helps... - thetubeguy1954 05:41:30 02/08/07 (1)

Isn't it great being over 50 years old and .... - Richard BassNut Greene 06:52:28 02/08/07 (0)

I miss Kava Parties. Who needs a liver anyways? nt - Presto 17:36:06 02/07/07 (0)

Stress and the like - jensw 13:55:17 02/07/07 (1)

This should help some... - Wellfed 14:07:55 02/07/07 (0)

What about Fuse Directionality? - Dan Banquer 11:53:28 02/07/07 (1)

WoW, tell me more about it? (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:15:46 02/07/07 (0)

Re: Comments on Kait - andy19191 10:55:56 02/07/07 (1)

I'll assume that's a rhetorical question. nt - Dan Banquer 11:05:28 02/07/07 (0)

Where's your proof, or James Randi's for that matter?... - Wellfed 10:47:15 02/07/07 (21)

Re: Where's your proof, or James Randi's for that matter?... - apesma 20:56:42 02/08/07 (3)

You're not from this country, are you?... - Wellfed 21:17:19 02/08/07 (2)

Re: You're not from this country, are you?... - apesma 08:25:32 02/09/07 (1)

Better yet... - Wellfed 08:35:41 02/09/07 (0)

More to the point, where is Kait's proof? - Pat D 20:22:23 02/07/07 (16)

Geoff Kait's proof is in the pudding... - Wellfed 21:17:34 02/07/07 (15)

There in lies the obvious problem with the challenge - Analog Scott 15:00:29 02/11/07 (1)

I believe you're right for the most part... - Wellfed 15:19:21 02/11/07 (0)

Geoff Kait's proof is in his bank account. Proof that fools and their money are easily parted. - AJinFLA 13:09:21 02/08/07 (4)

Facts really are of no consequence to you... - Wellfed 14:12:23 02/08/07 (3)

You need some perspective - kerr 05:39:34 02/09/07 (0)

You have to think of AJinFLA - bjh 17:03:38 02/08/07 (0)

Depends upon the "Facts" - AJinFLA 15:05:31 02/08/07 (0)

Re: Geoff Kait's proof is in the pudding... - Pat D 10:31:27 02/08/07 (7)

What conditions did I insist on that would bias the test in your opinion? [nt] - Wellfed 11:08:08 02/08/07 (6)

Re: What conditions did I insist on that would bias the test in your opinion? [nt] - Pat D 15:31:13 02/08/07 (5)

Looks are deceiving... - Wellfed 23:19:18 02/08/07 (0)

Granted, that was pretty amusing reading, but my issue with this JREF - AJinFLA 18:49:56 02/08/07 (3)

You'd have enjoyed the good old days... - Wellfed 09:06:03 02/09/07 (2)

Why, when I can enjoy your type in the good new days? - AJinFLA 15:54:04 02/09/07 (1)

I suspect you're good at mixing metaphors too. [nt] - Wellfed 23:36:16 02/09/07 (0)

Follow Ups

I'll assume that's a rhetorical question. nt - Dan Banquer 11:05:28 02/07/07 (0)