Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191

Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - thetubeguy1954 06:01:03 02/01/07 (38)

Damn, I'm going to miss this society meeting - AJinFLA 09:43:45 02/01/07 (5)

Me too:( - Russ57 11:40:27 02/01/07 (4)

Re: Me too:( - AJinFLA 20:34:28 02/02/07 (3)

"the least important one" - Russ57 07:29:03 02/03/07 (2)

Re: "the least important one" - AJinFLA 15:44:21 02/05/07 (1)

Thanks, much to think about - Russ57 08:15:36 02/06/07 (0)

Would you be so kind as to clarify something for me? - bjh 08:21:02 02/01/07 (27)

No Problem - thetubeguy1954 08:58:27 02/01/07 (26)

Thanks, - bjh 09:47:25 02/01/07 (25)

Re: Thanks, - thetubeguy1954 13:04:49 02/01/07 (24)

Your point taken. - cheap-Jack 08:04:58 02/02/07 (0)

Very well, only allow me to point out - bjh 14:40:05 02/01/07 (22)

Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 12:17:48 02/02/07 (20)

Re: Perhaps You're Right - AJinFLA 18:21:47 02/05/07 (8)

Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 06:16:24 02/06/07 (4)

It is not me you must convince, it is you. - AJinFLA 16:45:55 02/06/07 (1)

Another Moronic Reply From That Bird-Brain POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:09:05 02/08/07 (0)

Re: Perhaps You're Right - theaudiohobby 08:05:32 02/06/07 (1)

Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 10:36:43 02/06/07 (0)

Re: Perhaps You're Right - andy19191 05:07:00 02/06/07 (2)

Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - AJinFLA 16:54:06 02/06/07 (1)

Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0)

You're rare but not alone - kerr 13:35:21 02/03/07 (10)

Re: You're alone but not rare - AJinFLA 18:31:56 02/05/07 (1)

Wow! You made sense! - kerr 07:34:42 02/06/07 (0)

You guys will do just about anything to avoid actually proving you can detect what you say you can. - Pat D 18:01:02 02/05/07 (7)

I've already proven it! - kerr 07:29:03 02/06/07 (6)

Hardly. The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. We point out they haven't met it. (nt) - Pat D 07:53:24 02/06/07 (5)

No One Is Under ANY Burden To Provide Proof To Others! - thetubeguy1954 06:25:47 02/07/07 (3)

You don't understand burden of proof. - Pat D 12:02:04 02/08/07 (1)

Pat D YOU Don't Understand That No One Is Under Any Burden To Provide You With Proof. - thetubeguy1954 11:53:50 02/09/07 (0)

Exactly - kerr 07:51:05 02/07/07 (0)

But we HAVE met the burden of proof. The only disagreement is to whom we carry that burden (nt) - kerr 08:32:05 02/06/07 (0)

Umm... - kerr 11:49:09 02/02/07 (0)

Re: Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - tomservo 08:06:35 02/01/07 (3)

And just where did YOU "learn" physics? - Richard BassNut Greene 10:48:41 02/02/07 (2)

Step right up ....Step right up - tomservo 15:21:59 02/02/07 (1)

:-) .........(nt) - bwaslo 20:42:11 02/02/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0)