Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.
In Reply to: Step right up ....Step right up posted by tomservo on February 2, 2007 at 15:21:59:
nt This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: Dynaco Doctor Follow Ups Full Thread Please enable JavaScript to allow Full Thread view. Topic - Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - thetubeguy1954 06:01:03 02/01/07 (38) Damn, I'm going to miss this society meeting - AJinFLA 09:43:45 02/01/07 (5) Me too:( - Russ57 11:40:27 02/01/07 (4) Re: Me too:( - AJinFLA 20:34:28 02/02/07 (3) "the least important one" - Russ57 07:29:03 02/03/07 (2) Re: "the least important one" - AJinFLA 15:44:21 02/05/07 (1) Thanks, much to think about - Russ57 08:15:36 02/06/07 (0) Would you be so kind as to clarify something for me? - bjh 08:21:02 02/01/07 (27) No Problem - thetubeguy1954 08:58:27 02/01/07 (26) Thanks, - bjh 09:47:25 02/01/07 (25) Re: Thanks, - thetubeguy1954 13:04:49 02/01/07 (24) Your point taken. - cheap-Jack 08:04:58 02/02/07 (0) Very well, only allow me to point out - bjh 14:40:05 02/01/07 (22) Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 12:17:48 02/02/07 (20) Re: Perhaps You're Right - AJinFLA 18:21:47 02/05/07 (8) Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 06:16:24 02/06/07 (4) It is not me you must convince, it is you. - AJinFLA 16:45:55 02/06/07 (1) Another Moronic Reply From That Bird-Brain POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:09:05 02/08/07 (0) Re: Perhaps You're Right - theaudiohobby 08:05:32 02/06/07 (1) Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 10:36:43 02/06/07 (0) Re: Perhaps You're Right - andy19191 05:07:00 02/06/07 (2) Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - AJinFLA 16:54:06 02/06/07 (1) Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0) You're rare but not alone - kerr 13:35:21 02/03/07 (10) Re: You're alone but not rare - AJinFLA 18:31:56 02/05/07 (1) Wow! You made sense! - kerr 07:34:42 02/06/07 (0) You guys will do just about anything to avoid actually proving you can detect what you say you can. - Pat D 18:01:02 02/05/07 (7) I've already proven it! - kerr 07:29:03 02/06/07 (6) Hardly. The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. We point out they haven't met it. (nt) - Pat D 07:53:24 02/06/07 (5) No One Is Under ANY Burden To Provide Proof To Others! - thetubeguy1954 06:25:47 02/07/07 (3) You don't understand burden of proof. - Pat D 12:02:04 02/08/07 (1) Pat D YOU Don't Understand That No One Is Under Any Burden To Provide You With Proof. - thetubeguy1954 11:53:50 02/09/07 (0) Exactly - kerr 07:51:05 02/07/07 (0) But we HAVE met the burden of proof. The only disagreement is to whom we carry that burden (nt) - kerr 08:32:05 02/06/07 (0) Umm... - kerr 11:49:09 02/02/07 (0) Re: Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - tomservo 08:06:35 02/01/07 (3) And just where did YOU "learn" physics? - Richard BassNut Greene 10:48:41 02/02/07 (2) Step right up ....Step right up - tomservo 15:21:59 02/02/07 (1) :-) .........(nt) - bwaslo 20:42:11 02/02/07 (0) Follow Ups :-) .........(nt) - bwaslo 20:42:11 02/02/07 (0) You can not post to an archived thread.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full Thread Please enable JavaScript to allow Full Thread view. Topic - Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - thetubeguy1954 06:01:03 02/01/07 (38) Damn, I'm going to miss this society meeting - AJinFLA 09:43:45 02/01/07 (5) Me too:( - Russ57 11:40:27 02/01/07 (4) Re: Me too:( - AJinFLA 20:34:28 02/02/07 (3) "the least important one" - Russ57 07:29:03 02/03/07 (2) Re: "the least important one" - AJinFLA 15:44:21 02/05/07 (1) Thanks, much to think about - Russ57 08:15:36 02/06/07 (0) Would you be so kind as to clarify something for me? - bjh 08:21:02 02/01/07 (27) No Problem - thetubeguy1954 08:58:27 02/01/07 (26) Thanks, - bjh 09:47:25 02/01/07 (25) Re: Thanks, - thetubeguy1954 13:04:49 02/01/07 (24) Your point taken. - cheap-Jack 08:04:58 02/02/07 (0) Very well, only allow me to point out - bjh 14:40:05 02/01/07 (22) Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 12:17:48 02/02/07 (20) Re: Perhaps You're Right - AJinFLA 18:21:47 02/05/07 (8) Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 06:16:24 02/06/07 (4) It is not me you must convince, it is you. - AJinFLA 16:45:55 02/06/07 (1) Another Moronic Reply From That Bird-Brain POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:09:05 02/08/07 (0) Re: Perhaps You're Right - theaudiohobby 08:05:32 02/06/07 (1) Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 10:36:43 02/06/07 (0) Re: Perhaps You're Right - andy19191 05:07:00 02/06/07 (2) Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - AJinFLA 16:54:06 02/06/07 (1) Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0) You're rare but not alone - kerr 13:35:21 02/03/07 (10) Re: You're alone but not rare - AJinFLA 18:31:56 02/05/07 (1) Wow! You made sense! - kerr 07:34:42 02/06/07 (0) You guys will do just about anything to avoid actually proving you can detect what you say you can. - Pat D 18:01:02 02/05/07 (7) I've already proven it! - kerr 07:29:03 02/06/07 (6) Hardly. The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. We point out they haven't met it. (nt) - Pat D 07:53:24 02/06/07 (5) No One Is Under ANY Burden To Provide Proof To Others! - thetubeguy1954 06:25:47 02/07/07 (3) You don't understand burden of proof. - Pat D 12:02:04 02/08/07 (1) Pat D YOU Don't Understand That No One Is Under Any Burden To Provide You With Proof. - thetubeguy1954 11:53:50 02/09/07 (0) Exactly - kerr 07:51:05 02/07/07 (0) But we HAVE met the burden of proof. The only disagreement is to whom we carry that burden (nt) - kerr 08:32:05 02/06/07 (0) Umm... - kerr 11:49:09 02/02/07 (0) Re: Acoustic System Resonators Revisited - tomservo 08:06:35 02/01/07 (3) And just where did YOU "learn" physics? - Richard BassNut Greene 10:48:41 02/02/07 (2) Step right up ....Step right up - tomservo 15:21:59 02/02/07 (1) :-) .........(nt) - bwaslo 20:42:11 02/02/07 (0) Follow Ups :-) .........(nt) - bwaslo 20:42:11 02/02/07 (0)