|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Very well, only allow me to point out posted by bjh on February 1, 2007 at 14:40:05:
BJH,I guess having come from being an Objectivist in my early days as an music lover/audiophile a part of me hopes there can be bridging of the 2 different camps via some common ground.
However your post makes sense and taken in the light of comments from OBJs like POLLYinFLA it serves to make your statement seem all that more true to me and thus my attempts all that more futile.
Oh well, I tried...
Thetubeguy1954
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 12:17:48 02/02/07 (20)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - AJinFLA 18:21:47 02/05/07 (8)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 06:16:24 02/06/07 (4)
- It is not me you must convince, it is you. - AJinFLA 16:45:55 02/06/07 (1)
- Another Moronic Reply From That Bird-Brain POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:09:05 02/08/07 (0)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - theaudiohobby 08:05:32 02/06/07 (1)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - thetubeguy1954 10:36:43 02/06/07 (0)
- Re: Perhaps You're Right - andy19191 05:07:00 02/06/07 (2)
- Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - AJinFLA 16:54:06 02/06/07 (1)
- Re: Do you consider yourself to be an "objective audiophile" or a "non-audiophile"? - andy19191 01:32:12 02/07/07 (0)
- You're rare but not alone - kerr 13:35:21 02/03/07 (10)
- Re: You're alone but not rare - AJinFLA 18:31:56 02/05/07 (1)
- Wow! You made sense! - kerr 07:34:42 02/06/07 (0)
- You guys will do just about anything to avoid actually proving you can detect what you say you can. - Pat D 18:01:02 02/05/07 (7)
- I've already proven it! - kerr 07:29:03 02/06/07 (6)
- Hardly. The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. We point out they haven't met it. (nt) - Pat D 07:53:24 02/06/07 (5)
- No One Is Under ANY Burden To Provide Proof To Others! - thetubeguy1954 06:25:47 02/07/07 (3)
- You don't understand burden of proof. - Pat D 12:02:04 02/08/07 (1)
- Pat D YOU Don't Understand That No One Is Under Any Burden To Provide You With Proof. - thetubeguy1954 11:53:50 02/09/07 (0)
- Exactly - kerr 07:51:05 02/07/07 (0)
- But we HAVE met the burden of proof. The only disagreement is to whom we carry that burden (nt) - kerr 08:32:05 02/06/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
