In Reply to: Re: silly response. but, consistent.. posted by john curl on August 24, 2006 at 13:16:17:
jc: ""
You should be more careful""Well then discuss the issue. Don't "badmouth me".
Be civil..that is all I ask.
I've no problem discussing the test parts. But, nobody likes being told they don't know what they are talking about.
jc: ""
We don't think much of you either.""You've made that clear from day one.
I, on the other hand, have openly praised the two of you for your contributions.. I have stated openly, many times, that you guys actually LISTEN, whereas most of the engineering world chooses to ignore your observations.
I've stated openly that there are very scientific reasons behind many of your observations.
I've offered to collaborate with you, what did you say....""I wouldn't ask you for the time of day.""
As for JR: Let him speak on his own behalf..if he wishes to discuss, we can..If he wishes to simply badmouth me, so be it. I would prefer discussion, as I believe we all can profit from that.
A "discussion" is not "you don't know what you are talking about". It's about points of contention or agreement. We may not agree, but that is fine..
That is preferred..
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: silly response. but, consistent.. - jneutron 13:37:01 08/24/06 (1)
- Re: silly response. but, consistent.. - john curl 14:50:32 08/24/06 (0)