In Reply to: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? posted by morricab on August 17, 2006 at 05:01:34:
Just the opposite.since the output stage of an amplifier is very low impedence compared to the impdence of the feedback loop, the energy from loudspeaker reverse EMF is almost entirely dissipated in the output devices. Transistors are especially effective at this having very low inherent output impedence. The voltage resulting from reverse EMF is seen as a component of the error signal and is compensated for in the feedback loop. Depending on how effectively the feedback circuit is designed, it could add to or subtract from distortion so it is impossible to generalize but in a well designed feedback loop, the feedback will compensate by working against the error. One characteristic of negative feedback is that it tends to reduce output impedence thereby more effectively dissipating reverse EMF. Without negative feedback, the reverse EMF just adds to or subtracts from the bias voltage applied to the output device increasing distortion and FR nonlinearity.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Soundmind 08:04:51 08/17/06 (58)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Dan Banquer 06:08:23 08/19/06 (3)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Soundmind 11:51:16 08/19/06 (2)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Dan Banquer 05:48:17 08/20/06 (1)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Soundmind 08:20:36 08/20/06 (0)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - morricab 09:45:44 08/17/06 (49)
- Now I see it was just a troll. - clifff 13:31:28 08/17/06 (12)
- Re: Now I see it was just a troll. - morricab 14:43:14 08/17/06 (10)
- All of it. You are not listening. nt - clifff 01:06:56 08/18/06 (8)
- Re: All of it. You are not listening. nt - morricab 02:10:46 08/18/06 (7)
- Morricab....you are not listening. - Soundmind 15:22:07 08/18/06 (0)
- Your claims/responses here and elsewhere. - clifff 03:59:57 08/18/06 (5)
- Re: Your claims/responses here and elsewhere. - morricab 05:16:34 08/18/06 (4)
- You give the sneering man far more than he deserves, but bless you anyway. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:29:49 08/18/06 (3)
- Re: You give the sneering man far more than he deserves, but bless you anyway. nt - morricab 11:43:58 08/18/06 (2)
- I know how you do a snarl (grrrrrrrrr...) but how do you do a sneer? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:35:07 08/18/06 (1)
- Based on your postings clark it seems to me your face must be permanently deformed into a sneer - Soundmind 08:13:06 08/19/06 (0)
- If it talks like a troll, walks like a troll, and looks like a troll............ - Dan Banquer 17:13:22 08/17/06 (0)
- Your Owns Words Coming Back To Haunt You Cliff? - thetubeguy1954 14:00:25 08/17/06 (0)
- You are dead wrong....as usual - Soundmind 10:22:48 08/17/06 (35)
- Re: You are dead wrong....as usual - morricab 13:10:35 08/17/06 (30)
- Re: You are dead wrong....again& again & again - Dan Banquer 18:25:05 08/17/06 (21)
- Re: You are dead wrong....again& again & again - morricab 05:32:51 08/18/06 (20)
- Re: You are dead wrong....again& again & again - Dan Banquer 07:22:03 08/18/06 (19)
- Re: You are dead wrong....again& again & again - morricab 08:28:02 08/18/06 (18)
- Once again Troll - Dan Banquer 08:57:48 08/18/06 (17)
- Re: Once again Troll - morricab 11:26:14 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: Once again Troll - Dan Banquer 12:58:57 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: Once again Troll - john curl 09:25:55 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: Once again Troll - john curl 09:21:06 08/18/06 (10)
- Re: Once again Troll - Soundmind 09:50:50 08/18/06 (0)
- DUH! - Dan Banquer 09:36:20 08/18/06 (8)
- Re: DUH! - john curl 09:50:37 08/18/06 (7)
- Re: DUH! - Dan Banquer 10:28:49 08/18/06 (6)
- Re: DUH! - morricab 11:45:14 08/18/06 (5)
- Well, it does put perspective into his frame of reference - E-Stat 15:11:00 08/18/06 (2)
- Re: Well, it does put perspective into his frame of reference - AJinFLA 17:15:47 08/18/06 (1)
- Not at all - E-Stat 17:26:17 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: DUH! - Dan Banquer 12:57:04 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: DUH! - morricab 16:56:02 08/18/06 (0)
- And Furthermore troll - Dan Banquer 09:18:15 08/18/06 (2)
- Re: And Furthermore troll - morricab 11:14:10 08/18/06 (1)
- Someone has to be the head of the meritocracy... - Wellfed 11:21:17 08/18/06 (0)
- If you want to understand what negative feedback is really about....read a text, solve the equations - Soundmind 13:37:27 08/17/06 (7)
- See my post to Dan above, you are wrong . - morricab 05:34:08 08/18/06 (1)
- Still trolling I see - Dan Banquer 07:34:55 08/18/06 (1)
- Re: If you want to understand what negative feedback is really about....read a text, solve the equations - john curl 15:01:24 08/17/06 (3)
- Re: If you want to understand what negative feedback is really about....read a text, solve the equations - clifff 01:08:31 08/18/06 (2)
- Re: If you want to understand what negative feedback is really about....read a text, solve the equations - Soundmind 04:44:33 08/18/06 (1)
- Answer - E-Stat 15:34:22 08/18/06 (0)
- Re: If you want to understand what negative feedback is really about....read a text, solve the equations - morricab 14:07:00 08/17/06 (0)
- Damping factor - Dan Banquer 11:50:47 08/17/06 (3)
- Re: Damping factor - morricab 12:56:31 08/17/06 (2)
- Idiot Child Strikes Again - Dan Banquer 13:12:05 08/17/06 (1)
- Pot calling the kettle black - morricab 14:39:05 08/17/06 (0)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Dan Banquer 08:23:32 08/17/06 (3)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - morricab 09:47:06 08/17/06 (2)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - Dan Banquer 09:54:52 08/17/06 (1)
- Re: What happens to back EMF with a feedback amplifier? - morricab 10:25:48 08/17/06 (0)