I approve of such, especially were it not just advocacy of DBTesting but also had results such as I will discuss in a moment. Why, however, is this page described as for Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics?I psychologist friend brought my attention to an interesting article in the Journal of Neurophysiology titled "Inaudible High-Frequency Sounds Affect Brain Activity: Hypersonic Effect," 3558-3558, 2000. Subjects were presented LFC, low frequency component with no music content above 22k Hz, and HFC with only music above 22 k Hz. They used self reports and alpha-EEGs measures.
Subjects said they heard nothing when only the HFC was presented, but when LFC and HFC was presented the EEG showed increased brain activity which was interpreted as more pleasant which was not there when the HFC was removed.
This suggests that our brains react to HFC even if beyond audibility.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - I must admit that I have just found out that this was a dedicated DBT page - Norm 12:20:39 06/01/06 (93)
- Been there, done that. - Pat D 13:24:35 06/01/06 (20)
- Okay I have reviewed the references you gave and reread the article cited. Yes IMD could not be a criticism - Norm 12:27:51 06/02/06 (7)
- Was IMD controlled for in the previous studies? - Pat D 17:56:07 06/02/06 (6)
- The article is not by Kaoru and Shogu, does not use graduate students, and does avoid IMD. - Norm 20:44:38 06/02/06 (5)
- Re: The article is not by Kaoru and Shogu, does not use graduate students, and does avoid IMD. - Pat D 18:15:36 06/03/06 (4)
- As jj would say, do the research. I gave the full citation. nt - Norm 20:28:34 06/03/06 (3)
- I ask again, how did they eliminate IMD in the speakers - Pat D 21:33:21 06/03/06 (2)
- The HFC alone went through the supertweeters and no one heard it when it was played alone - Norm 09:06:55 06/04/06 (1)
- That's a good argument. - Pat D 16:04:46 06/04/06 (0)
- That is correct - Soundmind 15:34:59 06/01/06 (11)
- I am afraid I do not understand this. - Norm 17:03:06 06/01/06 (8)
- Can you guys just give me the citation? - Norm 20:20:02 06/01/06 (5)
- I linked to a post of mine that gives the citation, for God's sake! - Pat D 05:18:51 06/02/06 (3)
- You did but nothing comes up. nt - Norm 06:16:14 06/02/06 (2)
- The link comes up on my browsers. - Pat D 06:53:34 06/02/06 (1)
- Thanks. nt - Norm 07:05:13 06/02/06 (0)
- What needs to be done... - andy_c 20:42:05 06/01/06 (0)
- Let's expand on this a bit more - andy_c 18:56:36 06/01/06 (0)
- IMD... - real_jj 18:08:24 06/01/06 (0)
- This brings out another point along the way... - real_jj 16:19:04 06/01/06 (0)
- Re: That is correct - Pat D 15:39:34 06/01/06 (0)
- Did your friend also tell you... - KlausR. 13:13:00 06/01/06 (65)
- are page fees not charged for all publications in psychology? - Norm 14:22:00 06/01/06 (64)
- Is it bad research? - KlausR. 01:58:30 06/02/06 (63)
- "jj knows better." That's what *he* says. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:38:59 06/02/06 (61)
- jj - KlausR. 08:17:52 06/02/06 (60)
- Re: Why don't we - geoffkait 09:48:43 06/02/06 (54)
- Why don't you provide some evidence for your claims? - real_jj 11:38:40 06/02/06 (53)
- Re: "...and several scientists I've talked to..." - geoffkait 13:07:53 06/02/06 (48)
- Sorry, dear, but you have to accept the facts. - real_jj 13:44:02 06/02/06 (47)
- Re: The opinion? Oh, really? - geoffkait 14:18:36 06/02/06 (46)
- You don't have to like it, but that's how it is... - real_jj 17:11:01 06/02/06 (45)
- Re: "You don't have to like it" - geoffkait 18:20:26 06/02/06 (44)
- Well, actually, I was waiting to see if your chip would get into a Challenge test... - real_jj 18:38:00 06/02/06 (43)
- Re: 1M Dollar Challenge - geoffkait 03:07:15 06/03/06 (42)
- Tell it to Sylvia, mate, tell it to the fortune tellers... - real_jj 12:04:03 06/05/06 (41)
- Re: Ooo, that tickles - geoffkait 06:59:52 06/06/06 (40)
- Well, fella, I guess you just don't want to try for a million dollars... - real_jj 08:28:32 06/06/06 (39)
- Just think... - Wellfed 13:17:52 06/09/06 (2)
- Re: Just think... - arminia 17:58:15 06/09/06 (1)
- I'm banned for life... - Wellfed 21:16:07 06/09/06 (0)
- Re: You are so - geoffkait 09:28:17 06/06/06 (35)
- So, don't want to try for the million, eh? - real_jj 11:54:23 06/06/06 (34)
- Re: Now, why on Earth - geoffkait 12:14:46 06/06/06 (33)
- For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - real_jj 13:26:02 06/06/06 (32)
- Re: Deal of the Century - geoffkait 14:27:15 06/06/06 (3)
- Re: Deal of the Century - BJB 15:17:57 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: Deal of the Century - Paulhoff 16:34:37 06/07/06 (1)
- I believe the money is there... - Wellfed 09:29:36 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - Paulhoff 13:39:20 06/06/06 (27)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - geoffkait 13:58:49 06/06/06 (26)
- Re: For a million dollars. Guess you don't think you could win it... - BJB 14:18:47 06/06/06 (25)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - geoffkait 14:53:30 06/06/06 (24)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - BJB 15:19:23 06/06/06 (23)
- Our own Wellfed's amazing experiences with the Amazing One have been well-documented here on AA. - clarkjohnsen 07:58:41 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: "James Randi is not a scam artist" - geoffkait 05:40:22 06/07/06 (10)
- Oh HO! Audiophile tweaks are not fair game, but faith healers are? - real_jj 10:16:57 06/07/06 (9)
- Re: I am subject to verification, you silly goose... - geoffkait 11:01:49 06/07/06 (8)
- Really now. Please enlighten us, how does Randi run the challenge? - real_jj 14:16:35 06/07/06 (7)
- Re: "He gets a Subject Matter expert" - geoffkait 14:38:31 06/07/06 (6)
- Excuse me, but you are spouting nonsense. Why not try for the million, instead? - real_jj 15:07:34 06/07/06 (5)
- Re: Thanks for the offer, and If I feel the - geoffkait 15:37:45 06/07/06 (0)
- Re: Excuse me, but you are spouting nonsense. Why not try for the million, instead? - Paulhoff 15:35:11 06/07/06 (3)
- Re: Ah... and you must be the - geoffkait 15:44:24 06/07/06 (2)
- Re: Ah... and you must be the - Paulhoff 16:31:38 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: That's nice as I always - geoffkait 03:24:06 06/08/06 (0)
- Re: "Why don't you take the test?" - Paulhoff 18:33:56 06/06/06 (10)
- Re: Please try to - geoffkait 03:47:03 06/07/06 (9)
- Perhaps you should stick to aeronautical engineering? - real_jj 10:18:26 06/07/06 (8)
- Re: Perhaps you should stick to - geoffkait 11:06:33 06/07/06 (7)
- So, don't want a million dollars, eh? Or is it you figure you can't win? - real_jj 14:17:16 06/07/06 (6)
- Re: I don't cotton to - geoffkait 14:32:39 06/07/06 (5)
- So, you're saying that Randi is a Deadbeat? Or a Hornswaggler? - real_jj 15:08:38 06/07/06 (4)
- Re: So, you're saying that Randi is a Deadbeat? Or a Hornswaggler? - Paulhoff 15:37:06 06/07/06 (3)
- Re: I know, I know... - geoffkait 16:21:52 06/07/06 (2)
- Re: I know, I know... - Paulhoff 16:33:29 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: I know, I know... - geoffkait 17:04:31 06/07/06 (0)
- You obviously asked the wrong physicists. - jneutron 12:45:10 06/02/06 (3)
- Re: "I asked the right physicist...he did not laugh" - geoffkait 12:57:41 06/02/06 (2)
- Re: "I asked the right physicist...he did not laugh" - jneutron 13:16:40 06/02/06 (1)
- Re: Speaking of happy hour - geoffkait 13:34:51 06/02/06 (0)
- My biography is irrelevant. And thanks for affirming my point: jj always knows better. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:35:28 06/02/06 (4)
- Did I say "always"? - KlausR. 11:44:04 06/02/06 (3)
- "It's quite unfortunate (for you) that I know people who know you and your biography." - clarkjohnsen 08:30:43 06/03/06 (2)
- Amen, I guess engineers do not appreciate that authority has little role in science. nt - Norm 12:36:36 06/03/06 (1)
- Nasty stereotyping there, Norm... - real_jj 12:06:46 06/05/06 (0)
- Thanks for the reference. I don't know what to think about criticism about delay in publication. nt - Norm 06:22:44 06/02/06 (0)
- hmmm - jneutron 12:47:56 06/01/06 (5)
- In that particular study, check out the listening conditions :) - real_jj 12:49:24 06/01/06 (4)
- No need. - jneutron 13:07:07 06/01/06 (3)
- Actually, there is a need to look into the listening conditions... - real_jj 14:38:09 06/01/06 (2)
- I doubt if you have read it. nt - Norm 20:47:44 06/02/06 (1)
- Prove your claim, stalker... - real_jj 12:08:44 06/05/06 (0)