Since this issue was mentioned recently on these pages, the literature cited (Kaoru and Shogo (AES-paper 5401), Griesinger) does not indicate that humans can hear frequencies above 22 kHz.Griesinger further mentions that, in addition to the fact that the human hearing mechanism works as mechanical low-pass filter, a speaker driver emitting that kind of frequencies would beam that much that the "sweet spot" for those frequiencies would be very small :"Even assuming ultrasonics are audible, loudspeaker directivity creates an unusually tiny sweet spot, both horizontally and vertically." As a consequence, "To actually hear ultrasonics the listener must be very carefully aligned with the driver, both horizontally and vertically".
AES 5401 is from 2001, Griesinger's comments from 2003, has there been any publication in the meantime which sheds new light on the subject of ultrasonic hearing?
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Ultrasonic hearing - KlausR. 08:27:06 06/15/05 (34)
- Re: Ultrasonic hearing - Ole Lund Christensen 04:17:27 06/16/05 (26)
- Re: Ultrasonic hearing - Pat D 13:09:51 06/16/05 (16)
- You need to think again, the brain scans clearly shows detection, - Ole Lund Christensen 03:30:22 06/25/05 (0)
- Ahh, most interesting... - unclestu52 13:42:58 06/16/05 (14)
- Better? - Kal Rubinson 14:10:03 06/16/05 (13)
- If you haven't tried them - unclestu52 17:08:29 06/16/05 (12)
- Re: Very good analysis, I agree 100% - geoffkait 08:57:52 06/17/05 (0)
- I have heard them - Kal Rubinson 18:39:49 06/16/05 (10)
- which model have you listenend to? NT - unclestu52 19:56:57 06/16/05 (9)
- Doesn't matter. - Kal Rubinson 07:56:42 06/17/05 (8)
- Here's what's interesting.... - unclestu52 10:22:55 06/17/05 (7)
- Yet another scheme for dissipating RF on the speaker cable. - Al Sekela 14:19:23 06/17/05 (5)
- an addendum - unclestu52 13:37:40 06/24/05 (0)
- Re: Yet another scheme for dissipating RF on the speaker cable. - unclestu52 15:31:09 06/21/05 (3)
- Yes, you don't want to put the RF on the ground. - Al Sekela 17:09:39 06/21/05 (2)
- Re: Yes, you don't want to put the RF on the ground. - unclestu52 10:54:40 06/22/05 (1)
- That could work very well. - Al Sekela 16:57:44 06/22/05 (0)
- OK. - Kal Rubinson 11:08:34 06/17/05 (0)
- Subsonic hearing. - cheap-Jack 08:05:33 06/16/05 (8)
- You're probably hearing harmonics - Commuteman 09:00:40 06/16/05 (7)
- I doublt it. - cheap-Jack 15:16:05 06/16/05 (6)
- Re: I doublt it. - Commuteman 19:34:50 06/16/05 (5)
- Pure sinewave can't survive in the 'realworld'. - cheap-Jack 08:28:14 06/17/05 (4)
- Funny you should mention..... - Dan Banquer 09:50:22 06/17/05 (3)
- Only "on the scope" ? - cheap-Jack 09:59:34 06/20/05 (2)
- Re: Only "on the scope" ? - Dan Banquer 11:49:23 06/20/05 (1)
- I mean sound waves coming out of speakers ! (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:53:56 06/20/05 (0)
- Another mis-remembered citation... - Al Sekela 12:55:35 06/15/05 (2)
- You mean the Oohashi-paper? - KlausR. 21:36:42 06/15/05 (1)
- Don't know. (nt) - Al Sekela 15:40:54 06/16/05 (0)
- Not to worry; Morricab will be here shortly. - Dan Banquer 12:00:50 06/15/05 (0)
- I have no literature - unclestu52 10:45:09 06/15/05 (1)
- Re: I have no literature - Kal Rubinson 17:40:45 06/15/05 (0)
- Re: Ultrasonic hearing - marnold52@msn.com 08:52:34 06/15/05 (0)