Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News

Specialty Groups: Tube DIY Asylum

Tech Square

Welcome! You must be a registered Inmate to post in this Asylum.

AudioAsylum Trader

Acurus A80 - Selling an Acurus 80/wpc @ 8ohms (120 @ 4 ohms) st...

EconoTweaks AS-1 - EconoTweaks As1 Parallel AC Filter The AC Cleaner...

VOYD motors adjustment- why does sell a VOYD ? - cabriore 03:33:43 03/07/11 (1)
- RE: VOYD motors adjustment- why does sell a VOYD ? - cabriore 00:11:21 03/08/11 (0)
OT: Going to Chiang Mai University has its "challenges" - kurt s 20:15:23 03/01/11 (6)
- RE: "Maybe this is what Prop Head needs to talk about" - 1973shovel 11:22:05 03/06/11 (1)
  - Long response about my friend's and my own observations about Thai woman in their culture - kurt s 20:08:13 03/06/11 (0)
- Do they "teach you long time"? - barryb 16:54:04 03/03/11 (3)
  - No, only short time, - kurt s 17:46:47 03/03/11 (2)
    - RE: No, only short time, - Presto 11:16:54 03/04/11 (1)
      - RE: No, only short time, - b.l.zeebub 04:17:16 03/06/11 (0)
A brief subjective study on digital signal quality by AM fidelity - kurt s 03:04:04 02/28/11 (9)
- RE: A brief subjective study on digital signal quality by AM fidelity - rick_m 09:00:43 02/28/11 (8)
  - The problem of revising Nyquist's Theorem. - kurt s 23:41:17 02/28/11 (6)
    - RE: The problem of revising Nyquist's Theorem. - rick_m 07:33:33 03/01/11 (5)
      - Well, I've been mulling around another idea for what's the sound of low res CD makes worst of all - kurt s 09:03:43 03/01/11 (4)
        
        RE: Well, I've been mulling around another idea for what's the sound of low res CD makes worst of all - rick_m 10:31:30 03/01/11 (3)
        
        "I've found the depth of image to be largely a function of the recording, especially the capture techniques. " - kurt s 18:43:37 03/01/11 (2)
        
        RE: "I've found the depth of image to be largely a function of the recording, especially the capture techniques. " - Tony Lauck 10:21:14 03/02/11 (1)
        
        A very informative look at what you do behind the scenes on the pro audio side - kurt s 17:15:42 03/02/11 (0)
  - Excellent discussion there. A must watch for anyone wondering about hi-rez digital audio - kurt s 20:05:43 02/28/11 (0)
Help by finding the right KNOB'S for Nad 302 Amp. - shaby 13:16:18 02/07/11 (17)
- Is there a NAD dealer anywhere in your area? - caspian@peak.org 20:01:52 02/09/11 (1)
  - RE: Is there a NAD dealer anywhere in your area? - shaby 23:55:09 02/09/11 (0)
- Wow. Is this what has become of Propheads?? - robert young 16:26:42 02/08/11 (14)
  - well....... - hifitommy 15:36:04 02/18/11 (2)
    - RE: well....... - kerr 12:35:00 02/21/11 (1)
      - unlike well....... - hifitommy 15:10:14 02/21/11 (0)
  - We could argue over . . . - caspian@peak.org 09:24:35 02/10/11 (0)
  - If it'll help... - kerr 08:23:17 02/10/11 (2)
    - is that YOU.. - hifitommy 15:32:48 02/18/11 (1)
      - Prove it! - kerr 09:46:42 02/20/11 (0)
  - Yeah. Just a bunch of knobs... :-] -t - Presto 10:46:12 02/09/11 (0)
  - RE: Wow. Is this what has become of Propheads?? - rick_m 20:56:00 02/08/11 (5)
    - i am the riffraff looking over here to see if we can take over THIS place too. Naaah, nothin' here. nt - Elizabeth 13:52:03 05/21/11 (0)
    - HAHAHAHAHAH....... - unclestu 11:43:07 02/09/11 (3)
      - RE: HAHAHAHAHAH....... - rick_m 16:14:03 02/09/11 (2)
        
        batteries - unclestu 16:44:34 02/09/11 (1)
        
        RE: batteries - rick_m 19:01:54 02/09/11 (0)
Happy Easter!!! - kerr 11:00:45 01/28/11 (4)
- easter whafuk happened to christmas? - Don Till 16:11:00 02/07/11 (0)
- At least we aren't repeating Groundhog Day. :-) - kurt s 17:43:54 02/06/11 (1)
  - Imbolc has just passed - caspian@peak.org 12:37:26 02/07/11 (0)
- RE: Happy Easter!!! - geoffkait 18:06:49 01/28/11 (0)
2n6474 and 2n6476 RCA-Harris transistors - grhughes 07:29:54 12/19/10 (11)
- RE: 2n6474 and 2n6476 RCA-Harris transistors - Ruinthere@sbcglobal.net 17:52:51 01/02/11 (0)
- RE: 2n6474 and 2n6476 RCA-Harris transistors - Dan Banquer 10:33:42 12/22/10 (9)
  - I would like to believe that semiconductors have improved since 1968 - grhughes 05:13:53 12/23/10 (8)
    - Of course there are! - Al Sekela 14:49:45 12/23/10 (1)
      - Thanks AL! nt - grhughes 05:40:28 12/24/10 (0)
    - RE: I would like to believe that semiconductors have improved since 1968 - kurt s 06:09:47 12/23/10 (3)
      - Thanks a bunch, Kurt! - grhughes 07:44:26 12/23/10 (2)
        
        Some more pertinent quotes for you - kurt s 01:20:29 12/25/10 (1)
        
        What a GREAT read! Thanks Kurt - grhughes 05:56:41 12/25/10 (0)
    - I give up on attempting to be helpful - Dan Banquer 05:34:20 12/23/10 (1)
      - Thank you for your input Mr. Banquer! nt - grhughes 05:57:07 12/24/10 (0)
stick a fork it in - Don Till 16:33:17 12/10/10 (22)
- Damn it, Don! I was waiting for the next thread to be "Merry Christmas!" nt - Steve Eddy 18:29:59 12/10/10 (21)
  - How's this? - andy_c 16:31:31 12/11/10 (20)
    - All Christmas songs sound the same (nt) - kerr 08:05:08 12/14/10 (17)
      - No no, all reasonably well written Christmas songs sound the same. ;) nt - Steve Eddy 07:28:37 12/20/10 (16)
        
        I'm going to need measurements and audibility data (nt) - kerr 04:50:03 12/21/10 (0)
        
        Strange . . . they're not designed to sound the same . . . (nt) - Pat D 20:37:48 12/20/10 (13)
        
        Why would anyone want to listen to a defective song? -nt - E-Stat 08:17:22 12/22/10 (2)
        
        Lots of people do! - Pat D 16:40:32 01/02/11 (1)
        
        Sorry - E-Stat 19:43:54 01/02/11 (0)
        
        Ohhhh, now I REALLY need measurements and audibility data!!! (nt) - kerr 04:51:27 12/21/10 (9)
        
        In 25 year of extensive double blind testing no Christmas song has ever been demonstrated - bjh 09:18:57 12/21/10 (8)
        
        I know what I hear and I couldn't be wrong! - kerr 09:28:33 12/21/10 (7)
        
        Oh! Put it back on me eh? So damn typical! I stand with science ... away with you! nt - bjh 10:22:05 12/21/10 (6)
        
        I was hoping to read this kind of thread for what it really is - kurt s 17:04:38 12/21/10 (5)
        
        A good and true PropHeader can dispute anything! - kerr 17:31:00 12/21/10 (4)
        
        you're killing me, kerr! :-) some funny postings you have lately. nt - kurt s 17:56:35 12/21/10 (3)
        
        Every village needs an idiot - kerr 10:42:36 12/22/10 (2)
        
        Everyone loves the village idiot - Don Till 16:04:29 12/22/10 (1)
        
        Synonyms are fun! I like synonyms! (nt) - kerr 18:21:53 12/22/10 (0)
        
        :) [nt] - Ted Smith 10:41:48 12/20/10 (0)
    - RE: How's this? - Don Till 20:42:44 12/13/10 (0)
    - Perfect! ;) nt - Steve Eddy 18:28:52 12/11/10 (0)
Happy Thanksgiving Tomorrow To Everyone! (nt) - thetubeguy1954 12:54:15 11/24/10 (5)
- My Thanksgiving on the Serengeti plains - Norm 12:04:49 12/01/10 (0)
- RE: Happy Thanksgiving Tomorrow To Everyone! (nt) - tomservo 07:44:27 11/25/10 (3)
  - One can only hope that you don't pounce on the bird with the same abandon ... - bjh 11:12:46 11/25/10 (2)
    - Re: Here's a real conversation on the topic of microwave time domain measurements - kurt s 06:36:02 11/27/10 (1)
      - RE: Re: Here's a real conversation on the topic of microwave time domain measurements - rick_m 08:15:55 11/27/10 (0)
A more direct signal path - Awe-d-o-file 15:55:14 11/01/10 (15)
- Not sure what "signal" you are referring to but... - Don Till 18:18:14 11/05/10 (2)
  - RE: Not sure what "signal" you are referring to but... - Awe-d-o-file 16:47:41 11/08/10 (1)
    - RE: Not sure what "signal" you are referring to but... - Don Till 19:57:26 11/08/10 (0)
- RE: A more direct signal path - 1audiohack 09:24:45 11/03/10 (11)
  - HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - unclestu 17:28:18 11/03/10 (10)
    - RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - tomservo 10:10:32 11/05/10 (9)
      - Incidentally - unclestu 15:55:53 11/08/10 (2)
        
        RE: Incidentally - tomservo 06:46:24 11/09/10 (0)
        
        RE: Incidentally - Tony Lauck 16:01:53 11/08/10 (0)
      - RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - b.l.zeebub 11:30:32 11/05/10 (5)
        
        RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - tomservo 15:47:17 11/05/10 (4)
        
        RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - Tony Lauck 18:13:35 11/05/10 (3)
        
        RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - unclestu 15:53:22 11/08/10 (1)
        
        RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - tomservo 06:41:39 11/09/10 (0)
        
        RE: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - tomservo 09:58:52 11/06/10 (0)
A new audio format fantasy - full blu-ray information - kurt s 02:52:08 10/28/10 (2)
- RE: A new audio format fantasy - full blu-ray information - Lee of Omaha 10:47:06 11/03/10 (0)
- RE: A new audio format fantasy - full blu-ray information - Tony Lauck 07:55:34 10/28/10 (0)
Truth is stranger than fiction, another phenomena unexplained - kurt s 20:40:06 10/25/10 (12)
- Have you looked for subsequent papers by the same author? - Al Sekela 14:55:41 10/26/10 (11)
  - I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - kurt s 21:22:52 10/26/10 (10)
    - RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - Steve Eddy 09:56:54 10/31/10 (3)
      - RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - kurt s 17:15:39 10/31/10 (2)
        
        RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - Steve Eddy 19:31:17 10/31/10 (1)
        
        Thank you. nt - kurt s 00:36:39 11/01/10 (0)
    - Intermodulation. - Al Sekela 15:12:20 10/27/10 (0)
    - RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - rick_m 09:21:03 10/27/10 (4)
      - RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - Don Till 21:12:46 12/13/10 (3)
        
        RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - rick_m 19:02:08 12/17/10 (2)
        
        RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - Don Till 20:09:18 12/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: I have looked at follow-up experiments and models since then, and... - rick_m 08:34:19 12/19/10 (0)
"Ordinary" magnet wire - kurt s 00:15:09 10/24/10 (25)
- You're missing the point - Presto 12:39:35 02/02/11 (0)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - Todd Krieger 00:55:50 10/29/10 (6)
  - RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - kurt s 04:40:55 10/29/10 (5)
    - RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - Tony Lauck 10:56:19 10/29/10 (2)
      - RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - tomservo 11:34:26 10/29/10 (1)
        
        Kunchur - Tony Lauck 12:21:12 10/29/10 (0)
    - RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - rick_m 09:15:50 10/29/10 (1)
      - RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - tomservo 10:53:27 10/29/10 (0)
- RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire - tomservo 08:23:31 10/28/10 (14)
  - Most people are unaware - unclestu 11:55:49 10/29/10 (0)
  - Thanks for the response. - kurt s 10:18:24 10/28/10 (12)
    - RE: Thanks for the response. - tomservo 12:36:46 10/28/10 (11)
      - You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - kurt s 20:31:40 10/28/10 (10)
        
        RE: You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - tomservo 13:03:46 10/29/10 (9)
        
        RE: You've supported Jon Risch's speaker cable idea I believe - kurt s 17:48:21 10/29/10 (8)
        
        Just a bit more thing to add - kurt s 19:41:22 10/29/10 (7)
        
        Oh! And an afterthought possibility - kurt s 20:36:45 10/29/10 (6)
        
        Where are the numbers? - Tony Lauck 08:01:27 10/31/10 (5)
        
        RE: Where are the numbers? - kurt s 09:35:10 10/31/10 (3)
        
        RE: Where are the numbers? - Tony Lauck 10:02:58 10/31/10 (2)
        
        RE: Where are the numbers? - kurt s 17:23:26 10/31/10 (1)
        
        RE: Where are the numbers? - Tony Lauck 17:56:07 10/31/10 (0)
        
        numbers numbers, we don need no steenking numbers - tomservo 09:21:26 10/31/10 (0)
- YEP! - Dawnrazor 22:29:41 10/24/10 (1)
  - RE: YEP! - unclestu 16:31:30 10/27/10 (0)
NIST recommendation for k=2, or sigma=2. A big PDF for those interested. - kurt s 22:41:20 10/18/10 (0)
What is YOUR view on musical EXPERIENCE! - Don_C 07:37:26 10/17/10 (0)
Ah $flai da &&fylootd kwy-etl:;y - BigguyinATL 13:56:29 10/13/10 (4)
- RE: Ah $flai da &&fylootd kwy-etl:;y - morricab 05:27:51 10/19/10 (0)
- RE: Ah $flai da &&fylootd kwy-etl:;y - ahendler 08:01:31 10/14/10 (0)
- That's not the way my stereo works but I guess my system isn't high resolution enough.... - Don Till 16:49:13 10/13/10 (1)
  - RE: That's not the way my stereo works but I guess my system isn't high resolution enough.... - kerr 04:32:21 10/14/10 (0)
Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - thetubeguy1954 10:33:18 10/13/10 (16)
- RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - tomservo 08:46:12 10/15/10 (10)
  - RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - Steve Eddy 15:11:36 10/15/10 (9)
    - RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - thetubeguy1954 13:20:50 10/16/10 (8)
      - RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - Steve Eddy 13:51:53 10/16/10 (7)
        
        RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - LarryB 10:30:42 10/19/10 (6)
        
        RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - Steve Eddy 20:00:22 10/19/10 (5)
        
        Loved the "Audiophile Pricetag" spoof - andy_c 18:02:47 10/21/10 (1)
        
        RE: Loved the "Audiophile Pricetag" spoof - Steve Eddy 18:18:34 10/21/10 (0)
        
        Steve, you said the magic word: - LarryB 13:57:20 10/21/10 (2)
        
        RE: Steve, you said the magic word: - Steve Eddy 15:47:40 10/21/10 (1)
        
        Who you callin' grouchy? - LarryB 12:26:26 10/25/10 (0)
- No. Next subject... nt - Steve Eddy 23:41:11 10/13/10 (0)
- RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - kurt s 21:26:18 10/13/10 (2)
  - Comment on Audibility Threshold - Lee of Omaha 10:45:02 10/23/10 (1)
    - RE: Comment on Audibility Threshold - kurt s 23:43:01 10/23/10 (0)
- RE: Is This Why Wires Sound Different? - Don Till 13:40:24 10/13/10 (0)
Unscientific DBT advocate(s). - carcass93 12:53:46 10/11/10 (124)
- RE: Unscientific DBT advocate(s). - Tony Lauck 19:32:17 10/11/10 (123)
  - Number of reasons, not the last of which... - carcass93 09:06:46 10/12/10 (120)
    - RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - josh358 13:57:53 10/16/10 (4)
      - 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - b.l.zeebub 09:12:11 10/18/10 (3)
        
        RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - josh358 10:07:23 10/18/10 (2)
        
        RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - b.l.zeebub 13:04:10 10/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - josh358 13:45:07 10/18/10 (0)
    - This is only a skill available to some, self-anointed few. - Norm 19:00:32 10/14/10 (2)
      - RE: This is only a skill available to some, self-anointed few. - Tony Lauck 08:42:23 11/04/10 (1)
        
        I think it is unscientific claptrap on both sides. - Norm 13:41:18 01/13/11 (0)
    - RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - Presto 12:28:40 10/12/10 (110)
      - RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - josh358 14:03:51 10/16/10 (0)
      - I agree - but it works both ways. - carcass93 13:29:55 10/12/10 (108)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Presto 16:13:36 10/12/10 (107)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - b.l.zeebub 08:44:48 10/22/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:05:10 10/16/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 10:25:56 10/13/10 (102)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 13:12:05 10/13/10 (101)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 07:34:20 10/15/10 (8)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:10:55 10/16/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 15:29:06 10/15/10 (2)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 18:52:15 10/15/10 (1)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:12:02 10/16/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:27:00 10/15/10 (3)
        
        One interesting question about "differences" is... - Presto 13:28:46 10/16/10 (2)
        
        RE: One interesting question about "differences" is... - kerr 17:21:35 10/16/10 (0)
        
        RE: One interesting question about "differences" is... - josh358 13:47:24 10/16/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:58:24 10/13/10 (89)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 04:25:22 10/14/10 (88)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 02:55:02 10/15/10 (10)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:30:25 10/15/10 (9)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 11:45:03 10/15/10 (3)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 11:56:46 10/15/10 (2)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:22:59 10/15/10 (1)
        
        The only thing you've ever proven... - kerr 18:51:10 10/15/10 (0)
        
        Have you ever tried.... - carcass93 08:50:05 10/15/10 (4)
        
        Those who function with nothing but beliefs... - kerr 10:04:45 10/15/10 (3)
        
        You guys are repeating yourselves. (nt) - Pat D 11:46:12 10/15/10 (2)
        
        How much longer must we? nt - kerr 11:58:09 10/15/10 (1)
        
        RE: How much longer must we? nt - Pat D 18:31:09 10/15/10 (0)
        
        homework - Tony Lauck 20:28:49 10/14/10 (76)
        
        RE: homework - kerr 08:23:29 10/15/10 (75)
        
        RE: homework - Tony Lauck 10:04:14 10/15/10 (1)
        
        RE: homework - kerr 10:11:15 10/15/10 (0)
        
        "Good response Soundmind" - E-Stat 09:15:40 10/15/10 (72)
        
        RE: "Good response Soundmind" - kerr 09:56:12 10/15/10 (71)
        
        Sorry, I misunderstood - E-Stat 10:05:21 10/15/10 (70)
        
        Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - carcass93 11:30:09 10/15/10 (3)
        
        One of many fools who have come and gone...-nt - E-Stat 12:31:08 10/15/10 (0)
        
        RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - kerr 11:41:07 10/15/10 (1)
        
        RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - Ted Smith 21:54:21 10/24/10 (0)
        
        This looks promising - kerr 10:21:15 10/15/10 (65)
        
        With actual citations in hand... - E-Stat 11:40:19 10/15/10 (64)
        
        RE: With actual citations in hand... - Pat D 11:52:08 10/15/10 (62)
        
        The Power of Poor Memory... - E-Stat 12:26:48 10/15/10 (34)
        
        Ah, I see, a "tu quoque" argument. - Pat D 14:03:42 10/15/10 (33)
        
        Wrong again - E-Stat 14:31:15 10/15/10 (29)
        
        Since you resist the point below, let's analyze. - Pat D 19:36:56 10/16/10 (11)
        
        I'm not going to dissect this next journey into confusion - E-Stat 06:37:05 10/17/10 (6)
        
        You keep changing your ground. - Pat D 05:03:15 10/18/10 (5)
        
        You need to read again what I said - E-Stat 06:18:56 10/18/10 (4)
        
        Changing your ground again. - Pat D 07:22:14 10/18/10 (3)
        
        Evidence? - Tony Lauck 07:50:25 10/18/10 (0)
        
        Your memory fails you again - E-Stat 07:33:22 10/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: Your memory fails you again - Pat D 10:23:28 10/19/10 (0)
        
        Please fix your references. - Tony Lauck 21:13:41 10/16/10 (3)
        
        The URL works for me. - Pat D 04:53:10 10/18/10 (1)
        
        Thank you. - Tony Lauck 06:46:09 10/18/10 (0)
        
        There is no reference to BassNut's test - E-Stat 06:31:11 10/17/10 (0)
        
        So how does this show cables sound different? (nt) - Pat D 15:20:44 10/15/10 (16)
        
        It doesn't - E-Stat 15:39:35 10/15/10 (15)
        
        I know. - Pat D 18:10:36 10/15/10 (14)
        
        RE: I know. - josh358 14:38:45 10/16/10 (4)
        
        RE: I know. - Pat D 19:52:33 10/16/10 (3)
        
        RE: I know. - josh358 20:27:09 10/16/10 (2)
        
        RE: I know. - Pat D 05:16:33 10/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: I know. - josh358 09:11:02 10/19/10 (0)
        
        You know what? - E-Stat 20:40:37 10/15/10 (8)
        
        It would help if you actually read that old thread at AR. - Pat D 19:44:30 10/16/10 (7)
        
        That is exactly what I would say to you! - E-Stat 06:29:13 10/17/10 (6)
        
        Why do persist in propagating falsehoods? - Pat D 04:44:15 10/18/10 (0)
        
        You're not getting it! - kerr 08:21:59 10/17/10 (4)
        
        RE: You're not getting it! - Pat D 05:21:16 10/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: You're not getting it! - kerr 09:41:53 10/18/10 (0)
        
        Such just boggles the mind -nt - E-Stat 09:00:16 10/17/10 (1)
        
        I don't think that's true - kerr 09:48:30 10/17/10 (0)
        
        Geez.... When people say that the only thing that's worse ... - carcass93 14:19:03 10/15/10 (2)
        
        As usual, you have nothing to add beyond name calling. - Pat D 14:25:19 10/15/10 (1)
        
        You, with each of your posts, just YEARN to be called names. - carcass93 14:30:36 10/15/10 (0)
        
        Burden of Proof - Tony Lauck 12:14:02 10/15/10 (26)
        
        If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - E-Stat 12:28:35 10/15/10 (25)
        
        RE: If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - Pat D 15:18:09 10/15/10 (24)
        
        Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 09:10:10 10/16/10 (22)
        
        RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Pat D 10:20:30 10/19/10 (0)
        
        "Possibly deliberate"? - E-Stat 09:49:44 10/17/10 (0)
        
        RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 10:17:30 10/16/10 (19)
        
        RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 11:06:36 10/16/10 (18)
        
        RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 11:49:09 10/16/10 (17)
        
        Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 12:15:45 10/16/10 (16)
        
        RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 12:46:56 10/16/10 (15)
        
        RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 18:15:05 10/16/10 (14)
        
        RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 18:44:05 10/16/10 (13)
        
        RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 19:30:01 10/16/10 (12)
        
        RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 20:06:39 10/16/10 (11)
        
        Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 21:31:24 10/16/10 (10)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:24:35 10/17/10 (9)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:09:50 10/17/10 (8)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 08:57:42 10/19/10 (7)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 07:30:14 10/20/10 (6)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 09:33:36 10/20/10 (5)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 11:02:12 10/20/10 (4)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:55:29 10/21/10 (3)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:25:09 10/21/10 (2)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 10:29:20 10/21/10 (1)
        
        RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 10:56:02 10/21/10 (0)
        
        You really need to get a grip on reality - E-Stat 15:45:01 10/15/10 (0)
        
        RE: With actual citations in hand... - kerr 11:42:26 10/15/10 (0)
        
        Others - E-Stat 13:44:10 10/13/10 (1)
        
        RE: Others - Pat D 15:05:04 10/13/10 (0)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 07:13:22 10/13/10 (1)
        
        RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - rick_m 09:11:39 10/13/10 (0)
    - RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - Tony Lauck 09:33:22 10/12/10 (0)
  - Do you think the pretenders... - mkuller 21:18:32 10/11/10 (1)
    - Nope, I don't think so/ - Analog Scott 22:14:11 10/11/10 (0)
How do thinks work. - bjh 18:05:35 09/30/10 (8)
- The question is not "how", it is "how not". nt - kurt s 05:58:41 10/11/10 (0)
- What makes you think things work? (nt) - briggs 06:42:12 10/10/10 (0)
- Nothing… - b.l.zeebub 05:43:28 10/09/10 (1)
  - It's turtles all the way down... - Tony Lauck 09:04:10 10/10/10 (0)
- All things work because of magic smoke - Presto 11:38:47 10/06/10 (0)
- RE: How do thinks work. - Don Till 16:32:36 10/04/10 (0)
- RE: How do things work. - tomservo 12:26:56 10/01/10 (1)
  - RE: How do things work. - 1audiohack 17:53:53 10/01/10 (0)
Double Blind Speaker Cable Test? - Brian A 11:44:30 09/21/10 (46)
- Re: center image height - Presto 09:24:49 09/28/10 (0)
- Localisation blur - KlausR. 06:05:20 09/26/10 (0)
- I did a similar comparison once - caspian@peak.org 09:31:46 09/25/10 (4)
  - RE: I did a similar comparison once - Presto 12:02:43 09/27/10 (3)
    - RE: I did a similar comparison once - caspian@peak.org 15:25:27 09/27/10 (2)
      - I say similar things... - Presto 16:12:30 09/27/10 (1)
        
        Expectation bias? - caspian@peak.org 14:11:02 09/28/10 (0)
- Are you asking if you should blind test? - kerr 09:16:00 09/24/10 (6)
  - If image pacement varies then it should be reaaaallt easy to ID in any DBT - Analog Scott 14:08:07 09/24/10 (0)
  - "They" moved this from cable nt - Brian A 10:10:36 09/24/10 (4)
    - Ah, because you mentioned DBT's! - kerr 12:06:13 09/24/10 (3)
      - Hey, question... - Presto 12:05:17 09/27/10 (2)
        
        RE: Hey, question... - kerr 14:10:24 09/27/10 (0)
        
        RE: Hey, question... - Tony Lauck 13:57:15 09/27/10 (0)
- RE: Gosh, the Cable Asylum is next door - theaudiohobby 04:29:48 09/24/10 (0)
- For what its worth... - Al Sekela 11:09:42 09/23/10 (26)
  - "the late Dunlavy was a firm believer that all wire sounds the same." - Analog Scott 14:10:07 09/24/10 (25)
    - Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - E-Stat 07:23:37 09/25/10 (23)
      - Let's compare what Dunlavy actually said and what Al said he believed - Analog Scott 13:54:18 09/27/10 (4)
        
        Spoke to the man himself - unclestu 14:44:38 10/02/10 (0)
        
        Hmmm - E-Stat 13:57:15 09/27/10 (2)
        
        RE: Hmmm - Analog Scott 14:09:09 09/27/10 (1)
        
        RE: Hmmm - josh358 19:06:40 10/02/10 (0)
      - RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - Don Till 23:07:33 09/26/10 (17)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - kurt s 07:56:56 09/27/10 (16)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - rick_m 13:31:32 09/27/10 (11)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - kurt s 19:00:58 09/27/10 (10)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave_Intermod - rick_m 07:56:13 09/28/10 (9)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave_Intermod - kurt s 17:37:43 09/28/10 (8)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave_Intermod - rick_m 23:15:58 09/28/10 (1)
        
        Too much to answer for me today. Maybe a little at a time, and later. nt - kurt s 08:44:44 09/29/10 (0)
        
        You know not what you are dealing with - Brian A 22:11:39 09/28/10 (5)
        
        You didn't understand the physics nor the article at all. - kurt s 08:39:10 09/29/10 (3)
        
        RE: You didn't understand the physics nor the article at all. - theaudiohobby 07:08:45 09/30/10 (2)
        
        RE: You didn't understand the physics nor the article at all. - kurt s 04:12:19 10/01/10 (0)
        
        The whole idea is preposterous - Brian A 09:08:14 09/30/10 (0)
        
        RE: You know not what you are dealing with - rick_m 06:21:45 09/29/10 (0)
        
        This is stereo audio and science and engineering is done with it save for... - Don Till 08:47:56 09/27/10 (2)
        
        RE: This is stereo audio and science and engineering is done with it save for... - kurt s 19:34:33 09/27/10 (0)
        
        RE: This is stereo audio and science and engineering is done with it save for... - Tony Lauck 16:48:15 09/27/10 (0)
        
        RE: Let's let Dunlavy speak from the grave - theaudiohobby 08:47:19 09/27/10 (0)
    - How so? - Brian A 14:12:38 09/24/10 (0)
- Extended listening is the answer... - mkuller 21:42:59 09/22/10 (0)
- More extended listening - barryb 14:19:37 09/21/10 (2)
  - RE: More extended listening - Brian A 23:15:01 09/21/10 (1)
    - "Soon I realized that it sounded cheap, electronic, hashy, slow and limited my interest in playing my stereo" - barryb 14:59:17 09/22/10 (0)
The latest measurement breakthrough: X-parameter NVNA - kurt s 21:10:37 08/27/10 (4)
- A difrferent perspective... - Triode_Kingdom 09:03:14 08/28/10 (3)
  - RE: Yes, Simple Waveform Fidelity - gymwear5@hotmail.com 13:05:10 08/30/10 (0)
  - RE: A difrferent perspective... - kurt s 20:51:03 08/28/10 (1)
    - RE: A difrferent perspective... - psn 18:55:28 01/06/11 (0)
Digital Truncation and Dither Question............. - Todd Krieger 00:54:00 08/24/10 (4)
- why would one dither at all... - tunenut 12:48:12 09/07/10 (0)
- I'm really sorry, just cant resist - but your subject line reminds me of... - carcass93 17:53:43 08/26/10 (0)
- RE: Digital Truncation and Dither Question............. - Tony Lauck 07:17:35 08/24/10 (1)
  - Outstanding Explanation! Thank you! -nt- - Lee of Omaha 11:37:51 09/23/10 (0)
Must read: "Sound Reproduction - Loudspeakers and Rooms" - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:21:22 08/23/10 (3)
- Great book, but... - KlausR. 08:29:35 09/02/10 (1)
  - RE: Great book, but... - untangle 23:03:31 09/02/10 (0)
- RE: Must read: "Sound Reproduction - Loudspeakers and Rooms" - untangle 23:07:45 08/23/10 (0)
Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - thetubeguy1954 15:45:47 08/12/10 (98)
- This is not my experience. - Presto 09:39:50 09/22/10 (0)
- Ethan would have been entirely different if his Mother Had allowed him to part his hair in the middle - Cleantimestream 19:02:31 08/31/10 (0)
- Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - KlausR. 22:31:35 08/17/10 (13)
  - RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - Pat D 11:24:19 08/28/10 (9)
    - RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - kerr 05:58:34 08/30/10 (7)
      - RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - Pat D 07:47:13 08/30/10 (6)
        
        RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - kerr 08:38:21 08/30/10 (5)
        
        You forget - E-Stat 16:02:42 08/30/10 (4)
        
        Thanks for resurrecting that memory. At least 3 participants in that thread are gone! - carcass93 14:33:54 08/31/10 (0)
        
        Unfortunately... - kerr 16:33:47 08/30/10 (2)
        
        Some folks are players - E-Stat 17:03:10 08/30/10 (1)
        
        Can we use the term... - kerr 04:30:57 08/31/10 (0)
    - RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - Tony Lauck 15:44:10 08/28/10 (0)
  - RE: Comb filters, Ethan's pet peeve - DrChaos 19:55:03 08/20/10 (0)
  - Thank you for the very interesting link. nt - Tony Lauck 18:00:28 08/19/10 (0)
  - The winning post. Thank you for that. - kurt s 08:24:14 08/18/10 (0)
- Let's see, comb filtering makes expensive amps sound better???? More nonsence. nt - Norm 15:20:17 08/17/10 (0)
- Tom. you just need different speakers. I encountered some speakers that one could easily - artemus 20:29:56 08/16/10 (9)
  - RE: Tom. you just need different speakers. I encountered some speakers that one could easily - thetubeguy1954 11:51:51 08/18/10 (2)
    - The original Dahlquist DQ-10 had a notable "vertical sweet spot." - Enophile 20:40:22 08/21/10 (1)
      - Which Was Caused Because? (nt) - thetubeguy1954 14:14:22 08/25/10 (0)
  - He is just seeking to assess a nonsense argument. nt - Norm 15:21:58 08/17/10 (0)
  - other impacts on the sweet spot - mls-stl 10:53:28 08/17/10 (4)
    - RE: other impacts on the sweet spot - b.l.zeebub 18:31:24 08/17/10 (3)
      - RE: other impacts on the sweet spot - tomservo 10:25:20 08/18/10 (1)
        
        RE: other impacts on the sweet spot - b.l.zeebub 12:03:55 08/18/10 (0)
      - RE: other impacts on the sweet spot - mls-stl 05:57:56 08/18/10 (0)
- What about headphones? - Donald North 00:11:53 08/14/10 (3)
  - If you hear those differences via headphones, Ethan will just say that you're crazy. - Enophile 17:40:01 08/16/10 (0)
  - RE: What about headphones? - thetubeguy1954 08:55:48 08/14/10 (1)
    - Maybe Ethan can make "Head Tunes" for inside headphones to optimize the sound. - Enophile 00:19:07 08/22/10 (0)
- RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - tomservo 14:40:00 08/13/10 (0)
- RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - kerr 08:01:32 08/13/10 (9)
  - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - thetubeguy1954 08:28:47 08/13/10 (8)
    - I'v known Ethan for a few years... - LarryB 13:19:58 08/13/10 (6)
      - RE: I'v known Ethan for a few years... - kerr 09:48:05 08/16/10 (0)
      - I don't see a point. - carcass93 05:45:57 08/15/10 (2)
        
        Bingo - Iron Knee 20:44:10 08/17/10 (1)
        
        RE: Bingo - kerr 17:13:04 08/18/10 (0)
      - RE: I'v known Ethan for a few years... - thetubeguy1954 17:20:51 08/13/10 (0)
      - Yet... - E-Stat 15:54:24 08/13/10 (0)
    - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - kerr 09:20:59 08/13/10 (0)
- Junk science in abundance - kurt s 01:03:13 08/13/10 (10)
  - RE: Junk science in abundance - Pat D 14:22:53 08/13/10 (9)
    - RE: Junk science in abundance - kurt s 19:04:01 08/13/10 (8)
      - RE: Junk science in abundance - rick_m 08:29:22 08/15/10 (6)
        
        RE: Junk science in abundance - kurt s 08:13:39 08/16/10 (5)
        
        RE: Junk science in abundance - rick_m 14:24:48 08/16/10 (3)
        
        RE: Junk science in abundance - kurt s 17:16:11 08/16/10 (2)
        
        Marketing people are insidious - Tony Lauck 08:18:48 08/17/10 (1)
        
        RE: Marketing people are insidious - kurt s 07:56:30 08/18/10 (0)
        
        marketing BS - Tony Lauck 08:46:06 08/16/10 (0)
      - RE: Junk science in abundance - Tony Lauck 20:48:22 08/13/10 (0)
- RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - Donald North 21:35:26 08/12/10 (5)
  - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - Pat D 14:16:32 08/13/10 (1)
    - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - Donald North 23:36:07 08/13/10 (0)
  - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - thetubeguy1954 08:12:21 08/13/10 (2)
    - RE: Just When I Thought I Heard Every Excuse Why Subjectivists "Think" They Hear Differences! - Donald North 23:33:00 08/13/10 (1)
      - Thank You For The Kind Words Donald (nt) - thetubeguy1954 09:01:02 08/14/10 (0)
- Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - Enophile 18:25:31 08/12/10 (38)
  - My favorite "Don't hear ..." - gymwear5@hotmail.com 22:13:18 08/12/10 (1)
    - I also like the "relaxed" hands behind the head change. - Enophile 19:16:32 08/14/10 (0)
  - RE: Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - josh358 20:17:24 08/12/10 (35)
    - RE: Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - kerr 07:57:46 08/13/10 (34)
      - RE: Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - josh358 08:25:48 08/13/10 (33)
        
        RE: Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - kerr 09:10:18 08/13/10 (32)
        
        RE: Facsinating what we DON'T hear, eh? - Pat D 15:39:05 08/13/10 (31)
        
        That is almost as simplistic - E-Stat 15:57:21 08/13/10 (30)
        
        RE: That is almost as simplistic - Pat D 17:06:53 08/13/10 (29)
        
        :) - E-Stat 20:08:10 08/13/10 (28)
        
        ???????????? - Pat D 22:23:53 08/13/10 (27)
        
        You remain confused - E-Stat 06:44:24 08/14/10 (26)
        
        RE: You remain confused - Pat D 06:47:05 08/14/10 (25)
        
        Ok - E-Stat 09:15:50 08/16/10 (24)
        
        RE: Ok - Pat D 10:34:08 08/17/10 (23)
        
        "another victory for blind tests" - ???? Nobody here is aware of the previous ones. - carcass93 10:21:55 08/20/10 (9)
        
        Now, now - E-Stat 15:08:18 08/21/10 (8)
        
        RE: Now, now - Pat D 19:47:48 08/23/10 (7)
        
        Assuming that a twenty year old study - E-Stat 05:54:57 08/24/10 (4)
        
        Why don't you do a better one? - Pat D 18:46:03 08/31/10 (3)
        
        Like the study? - E-Stat 19:58:54 08/31/10 (2)
        
        On the topic of audio religion - kurt s 08:11:35 09/01/10 (1)
        
        Thank you - E-Stat 08:33:07 09/01/10 (0)
        
        I looked that up - kurt s 04:38:17 08/24/10 (1)
        
        RE: I looked that up - Pat D 11:26:14 08/28/10 (0)
        
        No - E-Stat 11:06:46 08/17/10 (12)
        
        RE: No - Pat D 18:52:50 08/23/10 (11)
        
        Ok - E-Stat 19:29:15 08/23/10 (10)
        
        RE: Ok - Pat D 19:42:01 08/23/10 (9)
        
        I do - E-Stat 05:57:16 08/24/10 (8)
        
        RE: I do - Pat D 08:35:15 08/24/10 (7)
        
        Answers - E-Stat 09:15:18 08/24/10 (6)
        
        RE: Answers - Pat D 13:11:24 08/24/10 (5)
        
        Do you honestly think - E-Stat 14:21:06 08/24/10 (4)
        
        RE: Do you honestly think - Pat D 16:53:25 08/24/10 (3)
        
        I didn't expect you to answer the question -nt - E-Stat 17:48:23 08/24/10 (2)
        
        You didn't ask a meaningful question. (nt) - Pat D 18:01:42 08/24/10 (1)
        
        Of course not - E-Stat 18:06:44 08/24/10 (0)
Listening to more than the sound- **music** - mike1127 18:16:57 08/08/10 (5)
- RE: Listening to more than the sound- **music** - caspian@peak.org 12:11:40 08/11/10 (0)
- RE: Listening to more than the sound- **music** - mike1127 00:37:03 08/11/10 (2)
  - RE: Listening to more than the sound- **music** - Todd Krieger 01:50:40 08/12/10 (0)
  - The differences you are describing... - mkuller 10:59:25 08/11/10 (0)
- Regarding **music** but skipping the instantaneous A/B part of the discussion. - Enophile 17:02:41 08/10/10 (0)
Listening to more than the sound--- and audio memory - mike1127 03:11:15 07/31/10 (17)
- Actually, what you are talking about... - mkuller 11:00:15 08/04/10 (0)
- I think audio memory can be much more vigorous than some say. And less, too. - Enophile 22:48:55 08/01/10 (9)
  - This is very important - Presto 15:25:55 08/04/10 (3)
    - Memory inside the listener's head - Tony Lauck 08:07:57 08/05/10 (2)
      - RE: Memory inside the listener's head - Donald North 12:09:51 08/05/10 (1)
        
        RE: Memory inside the listener's head - mike1127 02:20:17 08/08/10 (0)
  - RE: I think audio memory can be much more vigorous than some say. And less, too. - mike1127 23:06:53 08/01/10 (4)
    - RE: I think audio memory can be much more vigorous than some say. And less, too. - caspian@peak.org 13:12:56 08/03/10 (3)
      - RE: I think audio memory can be much more vigorous than some say. And less, too. - Tony Lauck 19:27:49 08/03/10 (2)
        
        Good points - caspian@peak.org 09:53:55 08/08/10 (1)
        
        RE: Good points - Tony Lauck 10:38:41 08/08/10 (0)
- There are two ways to listen... - mkuller 10:29:35 07/31/10 (5)
  - There's a third way . . . - caspian@peak.org 17:06:34 07/31/10 (2)
    - RE: There's a third way . . . - kerr 11:43:13 08/04/10 (0)
    - There are infinite ways, actually... - mike1127 19:18:34 07/31/10 (0)
  - RE: There are two ways to listen... - mike1127 16:51:32 07/31/10 (1)
    - Agreed...it's more of a continuum...(nt) - mkuller 17:09:21 08/02/10 (0)
I2s Pinout configuration on a Muse Model 2+ DAC - fathom7 21:38:09 07/29/10 (0)
Driver requirements of DHT's - sonicboom 09:31:28 07/26/10 (3)
- KR Audio's solution - morricab 06:06:15 07/28/10 (0)
- RE: Driver requirements of DHT's - Donald North 11:48:15 07/26/10 (1)
  - RE: Driver requirements of DHT's - sonicboom 12:40:03 07/26/10 (0)
The problem with CD’s is partly; - tomservo 08:09:13 07/21/10 (2)
- Why attribute that only to CDs? - Don Till 16:54:22 07/26/10 (0)
- Good stuff - thanks, Tom! - kerr 09:17:24 07/21/10 (0)

Threads started on or before 4/10/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 3/31/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 3/15/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 2/28/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 2/15/07 are archived Here.

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.