Home Pro Audio Asylum

Pro studio recording equipment and music production/industry.

Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards

Richard,
One of the nice things about 24-bit recording is the freedom to be more conservative with recording levels while still maintaing better resolution than 16-bit's full potential (thereby providing greater headroom). I suppose when you combine that with normalization at the 24-bit level before downconverting to 16-bit, there would indeed an advantage... and since you ARE using digital EQ, sticking with 24-bit is a good idea.

Most of my recording is still done at 16-bit, and I run my levels hot enough that they reach 0dBFS for a few inaudible samples here and there. Obviously, normalizing is not an issue in my case, and with only 16 bits to work with, I don't usually mess around with EQ. Since it's a hobby for me, I can live with less than perfect spectral balance.


-Anthony


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Signature Sound   [ Signature Sound Lounge ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - Bersani 21:00:02 05/12/06 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.