Interesting article from Mark Waldrep at iTrax.
Edits: 05/16/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Are we getting what we are paying for? - Mercman 09:14:52 05/16/11 (37)
- Author of the article seems to think that frequency response is the only benefit to high res digital. - orpheus 09:42:51 05/17/11 (21)
- RE: Author of the article seems to think that frequency response is the only benefit to high res digital. - fmak 04:53:30 05/18/11 (9)
- Here is an exact quote from the article, stating exactly what I said above. - orpheus 13:49:39 05/18/11 (8)
- Which article???????????? - fmak 17:50:36 05/18/11 (7)
- Uhhhh, the one that originated this thread. I think that you haven't read the article that began this thread - orpheus 19:33:07 05/18/11 (6)
- RE: Uhhhh, the one that originated this thread. I think that you haven't read the article that began this thread - fmak 01:13:54 05/19/11 (5)
- Your inability to understand that this thread is about the linked article is getting ridiculous. - orpheus 10:13:55 05/19/11 (4)
- How do you feel able to spread internet muck? - fmak 17:08:17 05/19/11 (3)
- Not spreading muck. You are clearly incapable of understanding something very simple. - orpheus 17:26:11 05/19/11 (2)
- Simple, I don't understand the spreading of false informartion. - fmak 06:55:46 05/20/11 (1)
- RE: Simple, I don't understand the spreading of false informartion. - Tony Lauck 19:47:39 05/20/11 (0)
- One can just listen and know the answer - Tony Lauck 14:30:27 05/17/11 (5)
- RE: One can just listen and know the answer - fmak 06:59:58 05/18/11 (4)
- RE: One can just listen and know the answer - Tony Lauck 12:44:04 05/18/11 (3)
- RE: One can just listen and know the answer - fmak 17:52:32 05/18/11 (0)
- I think you're "he's wrong", referring to Mark Waldrep can stay. - orpheus 17:33:27 05/18/11 (1)
- RE: I think you're "he's wrong", referring to Mark Waldrep can stay. - Tony Lauck 19:23:44 05/18/11 (0)
- To be even more blunt (my calling card) - Presto 13:28:17 05/17/11 (4)
- He probably said "moot point." (NT) - Kal Rubinson 16:41:34 05/17/11 (3)
- That's funny. - Presto 09:18:18 05/18/11 (2)
- A mute point is one not made. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 12:42:22 05/18/11 (1)
- or heard :-) [nt] - Joe Murphy Jr 08:43:46 05/19/11 (0)
- old news vs new news - Joe Murphy Jr 17:19:46 05/16/11 (0)
- RE: Are we getting what we are paying for? - Mercman 17:11:18 05/16/11 (0)
- I warned you ........ - fmak 17:10:40 05/16/11 (1)
- And so you did. (nt) - Mercman 17:12:17 05/16/11 (0)
- Easy (and cheap!) to verify - 4season 14:55:33 05/16/11 (1)
- RE: Easy (and cheap!) to verify - RalphH 15:09:31 05/16/11 (0)
- RE: Are we getting what we are paying for? - Old Listener 14:18:27 05/16/11 (0)
- RE: Are we getting what we are paying for? - RalphH 14:09:19 05/16/11 (1)
- RE: Are we getting what we are paying for? - Recorder 03:39:38 05/17/11 (0)
- Are you ever getting what you paid for? - Scrith 11:53:37 05/16/11 (4)
- RE: Are you ever getting what you paid for? - Old Listener 14:15:45 05/16/11 (3)
- RE: Are you ever getting what you paid for? - Scrith 11:55:07 05/17/11 (0)
- Since this is not a "DBT Free Forum".... - Presto 16:19:44 05/16/11 (1)
- RE: Since this is not a "DBT Free Forum".... - Scrith 12:03:24 05/17/11 (0)
- RE: Are we getting what we are paying for? - Bruce B 10:24:49 05/16/11 (0)