Computer Audio Asylum

Posted by ForgotPassword (A) on October 28, 2009 at 21:34:23

In Reply to: RE: Further cPlay 2.0b31 comments at 48 juli@ latency, tiny buffer posted by theob on October 28, 2009 at 02:43:10

Thank you theo.

I remade my I2S cable yesterday following your instructions, and it sounds good so far. Overall, it sounds cleaner, more detailed and resolving. However, the presentation also becomes a bit bright and forward, making vocals less enjoyable. I wonder if this is due to the lack of burn in. Does my experience with the RG179 coax sound familiar to you?

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we would let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines." N.P.

Edits: 10/28/09   10/28/09

• RE: Further cPlay 2.0b31 comments at 48 juli@ latency, tiny buffer - theob 03:14:38 10/29/09 (3)
  • RE: Further cPlay 2.0b31 comments at 48 juli@ latency, tiny buffer - ForgotPassword 05:30:42 10/29/09 (2)
    • RE: Further cPlay 2.0b31 comments at 48 juli@ latency, tiny buffer - theob 07:04:41 10/29/09 (1)
      • RE: Further cPlay 2.0b31 comments at 48 juli@ latency, tiny buffer - ForgotPassword 07:12:11 10/29/09 (0)

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Computer Audio Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Go Green ] [ Take5 ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---