220.140.8.187
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b31 Released posted by Dawnrazor on October 23, 2009 at 18:51:37
Sometimes lowest is not "best". On my system, latency setting of 48 sounds the most powerful and "precise", but falls short in terms of "warmth" and treble smoothness. I found that 128 sounds the most pleasant, natural, and the bass is better than any other source I've heard in my system.
Incidentally, latency setting of 128 is also what cics recommended for 192k. He said, "for 192k output, latencies to 128 samples (ASIO Hz of 1500) will be excellent. This assumes there's no "dead bands" in PLL, i.e. PLL is inoperable for certain jitter frequencies."
My other settings are: Tiny, SRC 145db, 192k, AWE, Timer Off
"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we would let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines." N.P.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: