41.183.0.21
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Just saw your request posted by rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com on October 03, 2009 at 07:44:49
E5200's attraction is the smaller L2 cache (2MB vs 3MB). We only need 2MB.
Anyway, I think the new Core i3 32nm CPU may be even better (but this needs new mobo and cooler). Although this beast comes with 4MB L3 cache, with right BIOS settings, power consumption could be significantly lower than E7xxx. We could possibly see ±10 watts consumption doing 192k@SRC145db!
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: