In Reply to: Or firewire. [nt] posted by alan m. kafton on February 7, 2009 at 14:15:17:
Like I said in the white paper, Firewire and Ethernet are both good possibilities for avoiding the jitter that is inherently added by S/PDIF (aka, AES/EBU,Toslink, etc.).
The problem with them is that they both require custom software to work -- at the very least custom device drivers. We made a decision that we would rather develop great new products than have to maintain computer software for all iterations of all operating systems on all hardware platforms.
Other people make different decisions. That is fine. If you find a Firewire DAC that meets your needs, then you should consider yourself happy. And for your sake, I hope that the manufacturer of your DAC continues to make the necessary device drivers for future operating systems, and that you can continue to find replacement computers that still have Firewire ports as you upgrade your hardware.
While I don't think that Firewire will disappear as fast as, say, an EISA slot (remember those?), it is clear that it is on the way out.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Or firewire. [nt] - Charles Hansen 14:45:40 02/07/09 (3)
- RE: Or firewire. [nt] - alan m. kafton 15:27:30 02/07/09 (2)
- RE: Or firewire. [nt] - Charles Hansen 16:43:48 02/07/09 (1)
- Good response.... - alan m. kafton 18:49:17 02/07/09 (0)