In Reply to: RE: Delusion is cheap posted by Audio Bling on October 14, 2008 at 23:44:31:
"If two groups report two different results then perhaps you need to look at your argument. It might be that your premise is wrong or that you are overlooking some factor that is relevant to the experience in question."
And yet none of the posters provide any scientific data to prove the existence of audible differences.. Is that to much to ask of anyone here claiming to have golden ears?? When I posted about DBT all I get is foolish responses that do not address the specific questions asked. Would any of the posters believing they can hear the differences in cables, IC's, or power cords please prove or disprove their position with factual scientific data!
The majority of responses become defensive and immature when asking these important questions.
MAK
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Delusion is cheap - racerxnet 06:34:25 10/15/08 (7)
- RE: Delusion is cheap - Audio Bling 21:44:39 10/16/08 (0)
- Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - carcass93 10:37:44 10/15/08 (5)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - benie 05:04:27 10/16/08 (4)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - racerxnet2000@yahoo.com 06:13:58 10/16/08 (2)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - jpaik 20:13:31 10/21/08 (1)
- Wow-that's bizarre. If 'racer...' needs to plagiarize other's work on a lousy audio blog in order to - powermatic 17:08:20 10/22/08 (0)
- My point exactly - I'll never be able to understand how they're going to apply that... - carcass93 05:45:55 10/16/08 (0)