In Reply to: RE: Delusion is cheap posted by inguz on October 14, 2008 at 21:31:45:
If two groups report two different results then perhaps you need to look at your argument. It might be that your premise is wrong or that you are overlooking some factor that is relevant to the experience in question.
Believe me, I do not “agonise†over this issue. Rather I am amused when someone claims to be in possession of certainty and is so dismissive of others that do not support their POV. A group of people (within this thread) record that they have an experience that goes counter to the claim that A is identical to B. Most, I think, are not arguing about “mathematical identity†but are saying that A sounds different to B. My thought is that you may challenge their justifications but not their experience. Experience has just as much value and relevance to the question as your proposition about “mathematical identityâ€.
Bling,
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Delusion is cheap - Audio Bling 23:44:31 10/14/08 (8)
- RE: Delusion is cheap - racerxnet 06:34:25 10/15/08 (7)
- RE: Delusion is cheap - Audio Bling 21:44:39 10/16/08 (0)
- Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - carcass93 10:37:44 10/15/08 (5)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - benie 05:04:27 10/16/08 (4)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - racerxnet2000@yahoo.com 06:13:58 10/16/08 (2)
- RE: Do you really expect serious responces to questions like that? - jpaik 20:13:31 10/21/08 (1)
- Wow-that's bizarre. If 'racer...' needs to plagiarize other's work on a lousy audio blog in order to - powermatic 17:08:20 10/22/08 (0)
- My point exactly - I'll never be able to understand how they're going to apply that... - carcass93 05:45:55 10/16/08 (0)