Computer Audio Asylum

Posted by cfmsp (A) on July 27, 2008 at 17:46:53

In Reply to: RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook posted by fmak on July 27, 2008 at 11:25:22

Just curious, but, why shouldn't bit perfect red book
be the aim of PC audio, given that there are not that many
hi-res recordings available, as compared to vinyl and CD?

I haven't heard (m)any here who say that they believe
native hi-res recordings can not sound superior.

Perhaps you are confusing detractors of the
"upsampling is always mo' bettah" position,
about which there does seem to be legitimate debate?

Can you explain your apparent derision towards thoee
in pursuit of bit perfect Red Book?

thanks

• RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - fmak 23:51:05 07/27/08 (0)
• RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - Tony Lauck 18:26:47 07/27/08 (8)
  • You go ahead - J.Mac 23:32:56 07/27/08 (3)
    • RE: You go ahead - barrows 12:52:32 07/28/08 (0)
    • RE: You go ahead - Tony Lauck 08:01:19 07/28/08 (0)
    • Ah, not an audiophile huh? - rick_m 07:08:47 07/28/08 (0)
  • RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - cfmsp 18:49:08 07/27/08 (3)
    • RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - Tony Lauck 07:45:59 07/28/08 (2)
      • RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - cfmsp 12:07:29 07/28/08 (1)
        • RE: Hi-res vs. Redbook - Tony Lauck 12:19:46 07/28/08 (0)

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Computer Audio Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2008, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---