64.13.14.96
In Reply to: RE: Test posted by Scrith on February 26, 2008 at 11:38:47
I've not tried them either but found their patent (5,814,761) on it to be a good read. It looks plausible to me that it could be an effective EMI absorber.
Check it out then see if you still feel as dismissive about it and the folks who have actually tried it.
Rick
Follow Ups: