Computer Audio Asylum

RE: LAME 320....

24.221.101.222

In Reply to: RE: Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. posted by rick_m on May 31, 2007 at 22:38:29

sounds awfully good. Danny Kaey of Positive Feedback Online is writing an article about this codec, I am told, and hopefully it will be published soon.

Danny made a CD-R of various codecs for me to listen to a few months ago. All tracks were error-corrected prior to burning. Included were WAV, LAME 320 and LAME 320 hi-rez. Without a doubt, the LAME 320 (non hi-rez) was the best sounding of all....fuller and more natural-sounding, far more so than the original error-corrected WAV track. All tracks were ripped and encoded via Poikosoft.

Food for thought.

Follow Ups:

RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/01/07 (2)
- FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/01/07 (1)
  - Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/01/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.