Computer Audio Asylum

Precisely..

75.93.2.155

In Reply to: RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... posted by kgiessler on May 28, 2007 at 17:53:29

But the result is the same as corrupt data: less sonic goodness. What's the hoary old line..."the operation was a success but the patient died".

Like most everyone I love the convenience of computer audio, and am very pleased with how good it can sound. But it seems that getting to the right software combinations and settings for a given hardware platform is every bit as demanding as setting up a good sounding analog system. Fortunately it's also as rewarding.

Rick

Follow Ups:

RE: Precisely.. - kgiessler 20:34:56 05/28/07 (7)
- RE: Precisely.. - JimOfOakCreek 08:38:02 05/29/07 (6)
  - RE: Precisely.. - Dawnrazor 08:16:55 05/31/07 (5)
    - Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. - rick_m 22:38:29 05/31/07 (4)
      - RE: LAME 320.... - alan m. kafton 02:42:43 06/01/07 (3)
        
        RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/01/07 (2)
        
        FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/01/07 (1)
        
        Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/01/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.