In Reply to: RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA posted by Mr_Steady on August 17, 2016 at 08:28:48:
I agree. I am open-mindedly interested in MQA, and I think I understand much, though far from all, of the theory and research behind it. Also, based on his track record, I see no rational reason to believe that Bob Stuart is a charlatan. I also think that MQA's ultimate success in the market is not a slam dunk at all.I also strongly agree that MQA absolutely must coexist with other non-MQA DSP functions in our systems. Stuart did address this question briefly in his long response at CAForum. But, I still have lingering concerns about the details.
From Stuart's response there, it seems MQA could be made to work in a digital HT processor and still allow the processor to do bass management, room EQ, etc. Basically, the processor does the MQA origami unfolding to hi rez LPCM, then applies DSP, then passes it off to the MQA DAC stage. But, it far is less clear what would happen in a PC environment, even if there were an open PC codec to perform the origami unfolding.
Digital crossovers requiring multiple DAC's would seem extremely difficult if not impossible while using MQA "de blurring" DACs. Fortunately, digital crossovers are not in my plans.
Edits: 08/17/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Fitzcaraldo215 10:30:25 08/17/16 (20)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Mr_Steady 12:17:43 08/17/16 (19)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - ahendler 11:41:34 08/19/16 (0)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Archimago 01:28:41 08/19/16 (5)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Dave_K 11:15:54 08/19/16 (1)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Fitzcaraldo215 14:21:51 08/19/16 (0)
- "The audiophile press seems to have a hard time being critical of something which is so obviously flawed!" - Beetlemania 08:16:55 08/19/16 (0)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - Mr_Steady 03:27:56 08/19/16 (1)
- RE: Benchmark weighs in on MQA - ahendler 11:45:58 08/19/16 (0)
- There is no DRM in MQA (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:00:59 08/18/16 (1)
- RE: There is no DRM in MQA (nt) - Mr_Steady 13:15:18 08/18/16 (0)
- Could you be so kind - Jaundiced Ear 02:27:15 08/18/16 (9)
- RE: Could you be so kind - Mr_Steady 05:21:33 08/18/16 (5)
- RE: Could you be so kind - Jaundiced Ear 18:59:49 08/18/16 (0)
- RE: Could you be so kind - Tony Lauck 09:08:52 08/18/16 (3)
- RE: Could you be so kind - ahendler 11:53:07 08/19/16 (1)
- Digital audio has already eclipsed the ability of humans to perceive a difference - Chris from Lafayette 12:06:24 08/19/16 (0)
- RE: Could you be so kind - Dave_K 15:00:30 08/18/16 (0)
- You need a DAC, Computer, Software player and some files. - oldmkvi 03:42:47 08/18/16 (2)
- Beetlemania's report - Beetlemania 07:29:33 08/18/16 (1)
- RE: Beetlemania's report - ahendler 11:55:23 08/19/16 (0)