In Reply to: sotm and the DAC have basic filtering posted by fmak on May 25, 2016 at 06:39:06:
Have a look at the web site.
I'd skimmed a write-up on a UK distributor's web site that was obviously lifted from mfgr's spiel. I haven't a clue what "coupled with sophisticated gating principles and proprietary 'Polaris-X' technology" means except "awfully jolly damn good indeed".
Seriously, I'm not for a moment suggesting it isn't well engineered but you of all people would surely agree that filtering can be a bit of a hit-and-miss affair and that no filter is a complete answer. Necessary but not sufficient and all that.
The OP worried if he was insane. OK, he's come to the right place but I don't think so - I'd say he was perceptive. Having been on a similar path myself, I tried to suggest a few simple tests to see if he can't tie things down a bit. If others can come up with better ones, that would be useful.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: sotm and the DAC have basic filtering - Ryelands 07:43:07 05/25/16 (3)
- hit-and-miss affair - fmak 07:55:13 05/25/16 (2)
- RE: hit-and-miss affair - Ryelands 08:14:43 05/25/16 (1)
- RE: hit-and-miss affair - Fuses - fmak 10:53:14 05/26/16 (0)