and I think I've seen/heard it all....
While doing my regular check on my NAS (a QNAP 469L), I found that it's CPU temp is a wee bit higher than I would like, so I decided to prop it up a little with some cheap metal feet with foam inserts in order to give it a little more breathing space. FYI, the NAS is connected to a Buffalo giga switch which is connected to an SOTM SMS-100 and a TP-Link router. The NAS's location is where it had been all along, before and after the footers, and nothing else had been touched
To my surprise, the sound changed a little after I put in the feet. A tiny bit lighter and not as energetic. Not something that I like. So I took the feet back out and the sound seems to be back. I'm not trying to discuss the merits or not of these feet. What I'm getting at is that this should not be happening at all. Digital, packet based data, being so far away in the audio chain, it should not reasonably have experienced any change at all, even in the eyes of this audiophile (as gullible as we audiophiles are).
Other than suggesting that I'm losing my sanity (which has a certain probability), any speculation of what might have happened?
Cheers.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - eduardoo 00:23:10 05/24/16 (58)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Windows X 12:14:32 06/05/16 (0)
- I would try other feet types. - beppe61 23:46:29 05/25/16 (3)
- RE: I would try other feet types. - eduardoo 00:36:46 05/28/16 (2)
- RE: I would try other feet types. - beppe61 03:14:56 05/28/16 (1)
- RE: I would try other feet types. - eduardoo 07:26:34 05/28/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - eduardoo 18:33:55 05/24/16 (23)
- An alternative theory - Fitzcaraldo215 10:27:27 05/25/16 (10)
- RE: An alternative theory - eduardoo 20:15:43 05/25/16 (8)
- RE: An alternative theory - Fitzcaraldo215 08:56:18 05/26/16 (0)
- quite quiet - fmak 23:17:19 05/25/16 (6)
- RE: quite quiet - Tony Lauck 09:00:53 05/26/16 (5)
- RE: quite quiet - eduardoo 00:33:30 05/28/16 (4)
- RE: quite quiet - Tony Lauck 09:37:48 05/28/16 (1)
- RE: quite quiet - eduardoo 19:22:37 05/29/16 (0)
- RE: quite quiet - AbeCollins 08:52:10 05/28/16 (1)
- RE: quite quiet - fmak 08:10:59 05/31/16 (0)
- Your theory makes the most sense IMHO. - AbeCollins 18:33:47 05/25/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Tony Lauck 09:23:34 05/25/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Ryelands 06:11:18 05/25/16 (6)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - eduardoo 20:23:39 05/25/16 (0)
- sotm and the DAC have basic filtering - fmak 06:39:06 05/25/16 (4)
- RE: sotm and the DAC have basic filtering - Ryelands 07:43:07 05/25/16 (3)
- hit-and-miss affair - fmak 07:55:13 05/25/16 (2)
- RE: hit-and-miss affair - Ryelands 08:14:43 05/25/16 (1)
- RE: hit-and-miss affair - Fuses - fmak 10:53:14 05/26/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - fmak 23:43:33 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Isaak J. Garvey 19:04:47 05/24/16 (2)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - eduardoo 20:09:04 05/24/16 (1)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Isaak J. Garvey 07:24:18 05/25/16 (0)
- Addition - fmak 11:41:49 05/24/16 (16)
- RE: Addition - AbeCollins 17:57:12 05/24/16 (15)
- Not in my (anecdotal) experience. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 18:18:22 05/24/16 (14)
- RE: Not in my (anecdotal) experience. - Kal Rubinson 08:40:15 05/25/16 (11)
- No harm, no foul... - Ivan303 08:58:40 05/25/16 (10)
- "invites a bit of tapping" is exactly correct - AbeCollins 19:20:45 05/25/16 (7)
- Digital solid-state devices are generally not microphonic - fmak 21:55:24 05/25/16 (6)
- The Truth - fmak 22:04:32 05/25/16 (5)
- So what is it ? - AbeCollins 07:24:17 05/26/16 (4)
- RE: So what is it ? - fmak 08:04:49 05/26/16 (3)
- You're back peddling now - AbeCollins 08:15:12 05/26/16 (2)
- LOL Again - fmak 08:20:46 05/26/16 (1)
- Understandable.... - AbeCollins 08:44:53 05/26/16 (0)
- invites a bit of tapping - fmak 09:22:29 05/25/16 (1)
- RE: invites a bit of tapping - AbeCollins 19:23:04 05/25/16 (0)
- How is this answer - fmak 06:32:56 05/25/16 (0)
- Same here Kal - nt - AbeCollins 18:23:41 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Tony Lauck 11:04:39 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Duster 11:02:23 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Isaak J. Garvey 10:45:46 05/24/16 (0)
- Agree with FMAK - Sordidman 09:41:12 05/24/16 (3)
- RE: Agree with FMAK - Isaak J. Garvey 10:48:53 05/24/16 (2)
- RE: Agree with FMAK - Sordidman 14:38:37 05/24/16 (1)
- RE: Agree with FMAK - Isaak J. Garvey 15:48:16 05/24/16 (0)
- Why is that a surprise? - Ivan303 07:29:29 05/24/16 (0)
- EMI interactions? - genungo 06:36:55 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - AbeCollins 05:04:43 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - Ryelands 04:21:35 05/24/16 (0)
- RE: Why is the physical placement of NAS changing the sound??? - fmak 04:15:58 05/24/16 (0)