In Reply to: RE: Doesn't 2L record in DXD? How did they settle on the MQA Sample rate? posted by Tony Lauck on April 28, 2016 at 12:54:55:
I wonder if you really understand what MQA is and does? Or. at least, what the claim is. I did provide a link in an earlier post in this thread.
There is no claim at all about MQA being better than the original file. There is a claim about an MQA file drawn from the master being better than the CD or other format previously issued to the consumer however.
At this point I feel a need to use the usual disclaimers. I am not connected in any way. shape or form to MQA or its progenitors, manufacturers or promoters and have no interest aside from general debate.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Doesn't 2L record in DXD? How did they settle on the MQA Sample rate? - PAR 15:40:30 04/28/16 (1)
- RE: Doesn't 2L record in DXD? How did they settle on the MQA Sample rate? - ahendler 16:38:31 04/28/16 (0)