In Reply to: Who's first to trash the MQA Review in Stereophile? posted by oldmkvi on April 9, 2016 at 16:46:38:
MQA is an encode-decode process. Unless and until there are actually recordings available in that format, it is impossible to judge the results.
I confess that I have reservations about a "lossy" approach to high resolution. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- From what I've read... - E-Stat 17:13:39 04/09/16 (16)
- MQA is Hostile to Computer Audio - Tony Lauck 08:49:58 04/10/16 (15)
- The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - AbeCollins 08:29:04 04/14/16 (8)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - Isaak J. Garvey 10:59:07 04/14/16 (7)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - AbeCollins 12:10:22 04/14/16 (6)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - Isaak J. Garvey 12:20:46 04/14/16 (5)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - BubbaMike 00:22:58 04/19/16 (2)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - Isaak J. Garvey 07:21:48 04/19/16 (1)
- RE: The Industry as a whole is HOSTILE to Computer Audio - BubbaMike 00:17:28 05/25/16 (0)
- LoL indeed Mr $6000 Reference Music Appliance - AbeCollins 12:39:46 04/14/16 (1)
- LOL! Were I to spend $6000 on a Reference Music Appliance... - Ivan303 17:16:17 04/14/16 (0)
- RE: MQA is Hostile to Computer Audio - navman 06:47:20 04/11/16 (1)
- I see no way that HAS to be the case.... - Ivan303 07:11:50 04/11/16 (0)
- Tony Lauck is hostile to anything he doesn't understand... - Ivan303 14:04:53 04/10/16 (3)
- Don't know about you, but - E-Stat 14:42:11 04/10/16 (2)
- I've heard MQA and heard one? of the talks at RMAF... - Ivan303 07:06:15 04/11/16 (1)
- RE: I've heard MQA and heard one? of the talks at RMAF... - Tony Lauck 08:28:43 04/11/16 (0)