In Reply to: RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... posted by ahendler on January 31, 2016 at 18:31:01:
Aren't the folks touting MQA saying it is revolutionary? That it "unlocks the resolution that is inside of digital files that we've never heard before?"
In my mind at least, for something to be revolutionary, heck, to even be meaningful, it's going to have to bring more to the table than differences -70dB down in the mix. I think Archimago's post is helpful in alerting consumers to proceed with caution with this product.
JE
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 19:22:01 01/31/16 (7)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 12:05:05 02/01/16 (6)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 19:44:26 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 14:21:08 02/01/16 (4)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 15:24:21 02/01/16 (3)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 04:55:29 02/02/16 (2)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 05:14:14 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 07:36:33 02/02/16 (0)